Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
    • Programmable Search Engine CSE.GOOGLE.COM clickme^^
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell Claim form - old CAT 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


hellsbelle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

no that's the notice of assignment

 

 

so as I though no DN

that's fatal to any claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

they will ask have you received all the required paperwork

you say NO

mediation will fail

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to explain what exactly I haven't received? So glad you checked that over for me or I'd have never known they hadn't sent it, I just assumed the documentation provided was all they had needed to send to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had my mediation today, Lowell wanted the full amount in monthly instalments.

 

I explained I hadn't received some of the relevant documentation from them relating to the debt, was asked to elaborate but asked if I was required to and they said no.

 

So I left it at that and said that if Lowell want to proceed with the small claims then so be it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you didnt tell em did you the DN was missing?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I just said a relevant piece of documentation was missing and they asked me what that was, I said am I obliged to tell you and if I'm not then I'd rather not say. They said I didn't have to but did press a little on what it was but I remained tight lipped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

strange it got passed the mediators questions at the start

did they not ask you first if you had everything to allow mediation...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's what I thought was weird too, even when I said I hadn't received all documentation she said well what do you want me to do? She didn't seem to grasp the fact that it was an issue and still continued to try to get me to settle with Lowell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi guys, it's been a while but today I got a general form of judgement order come through, it says that a preliminary hearing will take place next month.

What do I have to do now? In all honesty I'm terrified, I've never been to court and I have no idea what to say or do. It says the hearing should last 15 minutes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it a Case Management Conference to discuss directions or have you already had them by way of your Notice of Allocation?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my notice of proposed allocation it just states it's now a defended claim, its suitable for small claims and then there was the small claims questionnaire I had to fill in. Bar for that all I've had is the mediation phone call which was ended as I stated I didn't receive a copy of the default notice.

Not sure if either of those bits of info are what you were asking about but all this paperwork just really confuses me :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would look again at your Notice of Allocation very carefully ...most posters dont bother to read past mediation and miss the directions which they must comply with by certain dates.

 

The directions would be disclosure of all documents and you and the claimant submitting a witness statement by given dates.

 

If your satisfied there is nothing on your Notice re trial date or directions then its safe to assume its a Case Management Conference were the directions will then be set.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the form mentioned was what I mentioned in my last post, then attatched was the directions questionnaire which I filled in and sent off.

 

 

I've not had any further documentation from the court since I had my mediation phonecall.

 

Is there anything else I can do?

I uploaded defence as previously mentioned further back in this thread but never mentioned any suspicions I have regarding some of the things I was sent

I.e the blank document sent to lowell by shop direct,

the mismatched date of my first opening my account

and lastly they didn't send me the original DN.

 

Is that stuff I can mention when there?

Feel so confused by all of this and like I'm out of my depth in all honesty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my notice of proposed allocation it just states it's now a defended claim, its suitable for small claims and then there was the small claims questionnaire I had to fill in. Bar for that all I've had is the mediation phone call which was ended as I stated I didn't receive a copy of the default notice.

Not sure if either of those bits of info are what you were asking about but all this paperwork just really confuses me :(

 

All the form mentioned was what I mentioned in my last post, then attatched was the directions questionnaire which I filled in and sent off. I've not had any further documentation from the court since I had my mediation phonecall.

 

Different courts issue different process...the Notice of Allocation is numbered N159 (see below) which you have not yet received?

 

http://wbus.westlaw.co.uk/forms/pdf/cpf00139.pdf

 

So you have had the following (see below).....nothing more?

 

https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/PDFForms/N149A.pdf

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent so its a Case Management Conference 15 mins as per my post #114.Nothing to worry about its an informal meeting and the DJ will discuss how to move the claim forward given mediation failed.

 

He may allocate it there and then with directions....insist that he orders all paperwork to be disclosed.

 

Once you get your Notice of Allocation we can take it from there.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Informal meeting..take a copy of your defence and any CCA/CPR requests and responses.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do

Worried my defence is basic as I only sent an edited version of what was suggested on here.

 

Also do I mention that I wasn't sent a copy of the DN?

 

 

And my suspicions about some of the documentation provided or do I wait until the proper hearing for that?

 

Thanks for all your help so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim has not been allocated to track yet...claimant has not been ordered to do or disclose anything...take the full version of your defence...not sure why you only submitted an edited version without rereading your thread.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

.thanks for your reply I'm just about to go on to the mcol in a min and get this sent off. I'll make the amendment that you sent too. Would appreciate it if you could have a quick butchers at what I've typed just to make sure it's ok , I have put a few brackets of info on parts I was a little stuck with)

 

Will this be enough defence sent off for now? As I'm unsure what else I can do thus far......thanks so much for your help so far though ��

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1) defendant entered into consumer credit act agreement with shop direct acct no: xxxx

2)defendant failed to maintain required payments and default notice was served and not complied with

3) agreement was assigned to claimant 05/2015 and notice given to defendant despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £2.5k (rounded up) remains due and outstanding

 

claimant claims,

A) said sum of 2.5k

B)interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 at rate of 8% per annum accruing at daily rate of £0.49p but limited to one year being £180

C) costs

 

 

Proposed Defence

 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1 .Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had an agreement in the past with Shop Direct but do not recall the account number referred to by the claimant and have sought clarity by way of a section 78 request

 

2 .Paragraph 2 is denied I do not recall ever receiving any Default Notice from the original creditor nor the claimant

 

3 .Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served over 2 years ago.

 

On the 17/01/2017 (sent by recorded delivery) I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a Section 78 request. The claimant has partially responded to the CPR 31.14 but has failed to date to respond to the CCA section 78 request and remains in default.

 

3.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5.On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

6.By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

what do you mean by only an edited version of the above????

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...