Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • rather than reducing the levels of c02 and nox in the atmosphere A VERY large increase   Record-breaking increase in CO2 levels in world’s atmosphere | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Experts issue warning after finding global average concentration in March was 4.7ppm higher than same period last year Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...   Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...    
    • This is the info that I have. Name of seller... Thomas Stone. Reg LG51UOV Driven 109,000 2001 ford escort van 55 Price paid £500. (I know that that's stupidly cheap for a van, but my son wanted to take it apart, and put it to gether again) His address st margarates drive gillingham kent. We live swindon, so over 2 hours away. My oldest sons machanic inspected it . Sorry I don't know if I'm reading this right, but NSR wheel cylinder leaking NSR Shock mounting corroded  Rear cross member corroded  Rear number plate light missing Brake compressor valve seized Hand break cables insecure O/S Seal to floor repairs are very badly done Dash lights are painted out Bonnet ( This is all he wrote here.) Brake pipes are covered in black doodoo ( This is what the machanic wrote). My son asked Thomas Stone if it would need lots of work, for it to pass its next mot,  Thomas Stone said , " I can't see it needing mega amounts of work, for it to pass, it isn't rotten and it starts and drives ok, and the brakes work well".             
    • Alan Bates is in the Guardian today. Our Post Office victory is being twisted by those who don’t want to see its like again | Alan Bates | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Litigation funders didn’t ‘exploit’ subpostmasters, they helped us. Those who attack them have corporate interests at heart, says former subpostmaster...  
    • Discover 8 skills you develop when you explore different points of view that are essential for life and work.View the full article
    • Appreciate your response BankFodder. I am aware that the Consumer Rights Act does not apply in my case as I operate a business and, instead, should rely on the Supply of Goods and Services Act and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. I was a little unsure as, when I read the judgement of Hashim Farooq v EVRi Parcelnet, July 2023 I presumed that,  as Farooq had supplied laptops through Amazon,  the Consumer Rights Act would not apply but the judge refers to it in Section 22 as to why the claimant should be given judgment. Have I read this correctly? The reason for not offering full reimbursement was because I did not take out insurance for the full value.  In regards to correspondence from my customer,  I have emails from her in my timeline stating that she was waiting all week and that no one attempted delivery.  I have no doubt that she will be willing to corroborate the events with a written statement.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Reston Claimform - old Lloyds credit card debt -


julie1977
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I filed the SB on the 7th January via the online court service.

 

 

She did say that she would have expected them to already be in receipt of the documents before submitting a claim and we could wait and see if the SB would be enforceable but the courts may have already allocated to a court near us for the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Claims lodged everyday without supporting paperwork

 

Standard practice hoping for judgment in default

 

Good job that hour was free

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed the SB on the 7th January via the online court service.

 

 

She did say that she would have expected them to already be in receipt of the documents before submitting a claim and we could wait and see if the SB would be enforceable but the courts may have already allocated to a court near us for the hearing.

 

Good God, what subject did she learn in for her job, certainly not civil claims, glad you did not pay for such stupidilty

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I pointed out that the way the claim was worded would indiacate that they didn't have the information as the date would not have been listed as on or around 2008.

 

 

She didn't like it or the fact that I had already disputed it and sent letter with the assistance of you lovely people .

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I take it your going to listen to our advice here on ? :madgrin:

 

 

And the courts have not already allocated it to a court near you for a hearing........you have to complete a Directions Questionnaire first..which you only receive once the claimant tell the court they wish to proceed.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Morning everyone,

 

I hope you are having a nice weekend.

 

 

I rang the courts to confirm the exact date both cabot and rectums 28days was up.

 

 

The lady on the phone advised that the last day is today 11th and then after that it will be stayed.

 

 

I have had nothing through from either parties unless something comes in the post today.

 

Cabot advised that they could not provide the documents within the original 12 days timescale and advised of the 40days time scale.

 

 

Do they have the 12 days plus another 40 or is it 40 days from the date they recieved our letter?

 

Also we are wanting to make a donation for this amazing :-) service that you guys provide. I will post this later tonight once my wife gets home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Timescales are irrelevant

 

Claim will be stayed

 

Will then cost them if they wish to proceed

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you filed the SB defence not one questioning the paperwork they held

 

 

compliance or not to any timescales is immaterial for the CCA/CPR.

 

 

they have had 28 days to do 'something'

they haven't.

claim is stayed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

hows this going

I take it they've not willy waved since

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi everyone,

 

well I never thought I would be writing this again

Restons have sent another letter offering a discounted settlement to Lisa.

 

This is despite them not being able to provide the original agreement to the courts back in January of this year and also Cabot wrote to her advising that they would provide all requested information within the 40 day time limit, none of which arrived.

 

restons have sent this letter over the weekend.

What do I need to do?

 

Apologies for the out the blue with this I had hoped they had dropped off a cliff.

My brain is mush at the moment,

 

I have a very poorly dog that it requires round the clock medication.

 

Any help/support would be greatly received.

 

Many Thanks J.x

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to do anything except file it...claim is stayed

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go look after that dog

 

Far more important than these ruddy fleecers trying to s.cam you out of money

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you wish but its a discount letter

next will be disc'd letter

 

 

click upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't say anything about going back to court if you don't accept their fleecing offer

 

 

ignore them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi everyone,

 

My wife has just had a letter through from the courts with regards to this original claim.

The last update she has from the courts was back in Feb 2017 when they advised her that the claim had been stayed.

 

The letter that she has now had through is saying that her original defence claim that was done online was done in ores rly by myself due to me ticking the box acting as her representative.

 

They have now advised that she needs to re sign the paperwork and send back to them before the 11th May.

 

Apparently response had questioned this element and it’s taken the court a year to get caught up.

 

Is this a standard approach or does she need to be prepared for yet another battle with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

online was done in ores rly by myself >>>>????

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

 

Apologies trying to write the above message via my iPhone but it clearly didn't come out correctly.

 

Hi everyone,

 

My wife has just had a letter through from the courts with regards to this original claim.

The last update she has from the courts was back in Feb 2017 when they advised her that the claim had been stayed.

 

The letter that she has now had through is saying that her original defence claim that was done online was completed by myself due to me ticking the box acting as her representative.

 

They have now advised that she needs to re sign the paperwork and send back to them before the 11th May.

 

Apparently restons had questioned this element and it’s taken the court a year to get caught up to send her out this letter today.

 

Is this a standard approach or does she need to be prepared for yet another battle with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its statute barred doesn't matter what they find/send

so the court are saying fill out the N9 you still have?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what came through the post today. They have sent her a copy of the original N9 for her to sign and send back before the 11th May.

Court Letter.jpg

Edited by julie1977
missed out information
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...