Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx100uk
      @shiply - courier has vanished with my items please help

      By dx100uk · Posted

      quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • BazzaS
      my Leasehold/Freehold property and it's issues.

      By BazzaS · Posted

      If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • HP Mum
      my Leasehold/Freehold property and it's issues.

      By HP Mum · Posted

      Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • NewsBot
      Hungary opens up to Chinese tech despite protests

      By NewsBot · Posted

      Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • lolerz
      my Leasehold/Freehold property and it's issues.

      By lolerz · Posted

      You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

get caught at tkmaxx

korieeii
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

korieeii

korieeii

Posted
Posted

yesterday i get caught for stealing lenses,

i have no intention of doing that,

i just want to make sure that the sunglases is the genuine one,..

 

 

some of website say that the sunglases is genuine when the lenses is plastic.

.but i forget to put it back where it belongs because im gonna back home and have some discuss with my brother before going back to tkmaxx to purchase the sunglases..

 

 

but i know the only matter is i get caught stealing.

 

 

.i feel so ashamed because i were there with my sister.

 

 

.i dont know what to do since they said rlp letter will be at my home later and i have to pay them as what state on that letter

 

 

..i dont work and dont have any income.

 

 

.i cant sleep since last night wandering what has happened

 

 

..i get my lesson and wont do that again.

 

 

.can you help me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites
silverfox1961

silverfox1961

Posted
Posted

Hi and welcome to CAG.

I'm sorry if this assumption is wrong but I suspect that English is not your first language so I will just stick to the basics.

 

Ignore everything that comes in the post from RLP or one of the debt collectors that will contact you.

They have NO power to do anything to you.

 

The only people that can take action are TKMaxx and they don't bother as it is not worth their time.

 

When you get the letter, come back and we can help calm your nerves

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites
korieeii

korieeii

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hi and welcome to CAG.

I'm sorry if this assumption is wrong but I suspect that English is not your first language so I will just stick to the basics.

 

Ignore everything that comes in the post from RLP or one of the debt collectors that will contact you.

They have NO power to do anything to you.

 

The only people that can take action are TKMaxx and they don't bother as it is not worth their time.

 

When you get the letter, come back and we can help calm your nerves

 

its alright,my english is very bad..but what if tk maxx take action?or it never happened before?

Link to post
Share on other sites
silverfox1961

silverfox1961

Posted
Posted

Once TKMaxx pass the case over to RLP, their involvement in the case ends. I will try to explain this as easily as I can.

 

Let us suppose the sunglasses cost £10. If TKMaxx took action against you, this would be in a county court, not a criminal court. All they would be able to claim is the £10 plus a small administration fee and the FIXED costs of taking court action (usually £75). It would cost TKMaxx a lot more than they could ever hope to get back. Some solicitors charge £300 per case so it is not worth it for TKMaxx to take any action.

 

RLP try to make you believe they have a right to demand this 'compensation' for security costs. They can't! Plain and simple. Over 4 years ago, a retailer took action against a couple of shoplifters backed up by RLP. They lost-the claim for security costs were completely thrown out. Security staff at TKMaxx get paid whether or not they stop a shoplifter.

 

There are a few letters scattered around this forum. They are full of 'if' 'may' 'might', nothing definite. Purely a scare tactic. Don't fall for it. Come here and we can assist with your fears.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites
korieeii

korieeii

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Once TKMaxx pass the case over to RLP, their involvement in the case ends. I will try to explain this as easily as I can.

 

Let us suppose the sunglasses cost £10. If TKMaxx took action against you, this would be in a county court, not a criminal court. All they would be able to claim is the £10 plus a small administration fee and the FIXED costs of taking court action (usually £75). It would cost TKMaxx a lot more than they could ever hope to get back. Some solicitors charge £300 per case so it is not worth it for TKMaxx to take any action.

 

RLP try to make you believe they have a right to demand this 'compensation' for security costs. They can't! Plain and simple. Over 4 years ago, a retailer took action against a couple of shoplifters backed up by RLP. They lost-the claim for security costs were completely thrown out. Security staff at TKMaxx get paid whether or not they stop a shoplifter.

 

There are a few letters scattered around this forum. They are full of 'if' 'may' 'might', nothing definite. Purely a scare tactic. Don't fall for it. Come here and we can assist with your fears.

 

Thank you very much for your info

Link to post
Share on other sites
brassnecked

brassnecked

Posted
Posted

RLP have even less powers than a bottom feeding Debt Collection Agency, as in zilch.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
renegadeimp

renegadeimp

Posted
Posted

Ignore rlp korieeii. They can't do anything at all to you.

 

Make sure you stop doing this kind of stuff as in terms future you may get caught and they may call the police instead of rlp.

 

Get on with your life and put this behind you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 weeks later...
silverfox1961

silverfox1961

Posted
Posted
erm i got my letter,but it said "our client has provided us with your personal details and informations detailing your involvement in an incident for RLP to pursue a civil claim on their behalf"?

 

Hi again,

If you are able, can you scan the letter, save in a Portable Document Format (pdf) and upload the letter here. Ensure that you hide ALL information that identifies you. This would include name, address, any reference numbers and barcodes. This is to ensure you stay as anonymous as possible.

 

The statement.

our client has provided us with your personal details and informations detailing your involvement in an incident for RLPlink3.gif to pursue a civil claim on their behalf"?

 

means absolutely nothing. All they can do is send letters. They have carefully worded the letter to make you think that they will start a civil claim. They cannot. ONLY TKMaxx can do that and as I have mentioned before, they will not as it would cost them more in court costs than they could ever get back.

 

All you have to remember is that RLP will treat this as a game. They will state that internet advice is wrong. No! They are wrong!

 

I did a post regarding what RLP really mean. Below is the link.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?448994-RLP-FAQ-s.-What-do-they-mean-Reviewed-September-2015&p=4762870&viewfull=1#post4762870

 

I spent a long time researching and it is my belief that what I quoted is correct.

 

In other words, don't worry about these letters. They are sent to make you more worried that you should be.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites
brassnecked

brassnecked

Posted
Posted

Follow the Fox, it is the only way, ignore them completely. Any response to them only encourages them to bombard you with threatOgrams that have NO legal standing at all.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

ignore

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...