Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northumbrian Water company claimform - agreed to pay, what do I do with the claim now?


n20998
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2650 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If they don't cancel the court claim, you will end up with a default CCJ if you don't acknowledge the claim. So still acknowledge that you will defend in full and then you might even enter a defence that they did not allow sufficient time to resolve but that you have now entered into a repayment arrangement with x water company. If there are other issues you can include in defence. The claim will then be stayed after a period as they don't need to continue because you are making payment.

 

What you want to avoid is a default CCJ on your record, which the water company might not be unhappy about.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they mention the words consent or tomlin order

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies I should have been more clear. I acknowledged the claim to give myself more time - the time has almost run out. I wrote a letter to the compnay offering instalments and they have written back. The main things they said...

 

I am writing further to your recent contact with this office about your outstanding account and I can confirm that, as a goodwill gesure, it has been agreed that you can settle the deby by paying in instalments to prevent judgement being entered against you.

 

...

 

If you fail to make the payments on the due dates we will have no alternative but to refer your account back to the County Court for Judgement which will add a further fee to your account and may also affect your credit rating.

I'm not sure why they mention an extra fee as they have already added the charges they are allowed to add for taking it to court. So, do I need to do anything or can I just leave it and make the payments?

 

Thanks for all the responses

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a Tomlin to me

Yes they can add court fees

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who is the water company please

and is this only this years bill?

 

I would be ringing them and asking what is happening about the claim?

 

ask them if this agreement is a tomlin/consent order

- a Tomlin Order (Consent) stays the claim ...avoids judgment....as long as you stick to the agreed payments.

 

or if its an agreement shall we say in kind and the whole claim is dropped

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just clarify what they are offering first.

 

they say as a gesture of good will....

but then say back to court to enforce judgement

 

if they drop the case totally

they cant do that.

 

so i'm gonna guess its a tomlin they will send you a tomlin agreement.

and as long as you pay that

nothing will show on your file

nor will you get a CCJ.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put in a defence and say that the debt is denied and that you and the claimant have reached an agreement so that now the claim should be stayed.

Send that off and don't put anything more.

Stay making the agreed payments and don't miss a single one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response. I emailed the litigation team and got the response below - still not sure if I'm ok!

 

The court confirmed that a Tomlin Order can only be granted after a defence has been submitted. Due to you not defending the claim and a Direct Debit being in place for £xx per month (an initial payment of £xx will be taken on xx xx xx) a Tomlin Order is not required.

 

By making the payments agreed, it will prevent a County Court Judgment being entered against you, which could affect your credit rating.

They put that section in bold, not me.
Link to post
Share on other sites

that's as clear as mud!!

 

 

id just get it in black and white that they ARE NOT taking you to court now then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno cant makeout if they ARE going for a judgement meself

 

 

what date is top right of the claimform?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a defence needs to be filed by 20th nov

 

 

as a litigant in person

you wont be punished if you DO need to file a defence late Monday.

 

 

can we see these emails from them and you suitably redacted?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk thanks so much for your responses and help. I've just had a look, unfortunately I can't show you the first email I sent them as I used a webform and don't have a copy of the text. I sent it on 2 November 2016 and filled in my details on my online account to set up the direct debit. They set up the DD and sent me a letter that I mentioned earlier in the thread

 

I am writing further to your recent contact with this office about your outstanding account and I can confirm that, as a goodwill gesure, it has been agreed that you can settle the deby by paying in instalments to prevent judgement being entered against you.

 

An initial payment of xx is now due no later than xx, followed by x monthly payments of xx commencing xx.

 

These payments will be collected by Direct Debit as you requested.

 

If you fail to make the payments on the due dates we will have no alternative but to refer your account back to the county courtlink3.gif for Judgement which will add a further fee to your account and may also affect your credit rating.

I emailed the litigation team this (I made mistakes, I know)

 

Customer reference:

 

Claim number:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

I write with reference to the above account.

Thank you for agreeing to the repayment plan I have suggested. As the court action is still in the system, I need you to before it or confirm that we have agreed to a Tomlin Order in order to avoid pursuing the full County Court Judgement. If you are unable to do this I will need to defend the case - by saying that we have agreed a repayment plan - so that a judgement is not entered against me by default.

Please reply to this email by 21 November 2016 due to the legal timescales in place.

Thanks

They responded by email with

 

18 November 2016

Mr xx

Emailed to xx

 

Dear Mr xx

Customer reference:

Claim number:

Thank you for your email which was received at our office on 17 November 2016.

The court confirmed that a Tomlin Order can only be granted after a defence has been submitted. Due to you not defending the claim and a Direct Debit being in place for xx per month (an initial payment of xx will be taken on xx) a Tomlin Order is not required.

By making the payments agreed, it will prevent a County Court Judgment being entered against you, which could affect your credit rating.

Should you wish to discuss any of the details contained in this letter or have any further points you would like to raise please contact us either in writing at xx, by telephone on xx between the hours of 9am and 5pm Monday to Friday or email us at xx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i see what you mean..

 

ok as it invites you to discuss things.

 

I would simply reply asking:

 

I thank you for your co-operation in this matter

it is extremely important to me that I do not get a CCJ,

nor have a stayed court claim hanging over me or showing on my credit file.

 

sorry if I am asking a silly question but I am not legally minded other than reading internet debt forums

so might have used the wrong terminology before.

 

but can I just totally confirm that the court case has been discontinued by yourselves, and the court has/will be informed?

because as it stands looking at the MCOL website regarding the claim, it is live and requires me to enter a defence yesterday.

 

I thank you for you time

Edited by Andyorch
Changed Judgment to court claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it will be ok

but ideally you need a reply to that email by mid afternoon Monday

then if you need to file a defence like post 11

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go ring him

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so I phoned and the person went through the court procedure. I asked them to email what they said so I had a record and this is it...

 

Hello xx xxx,

 

As discussed, the court process is as follows:

 

Once a Claim has been issued by the Court, we as the Claimant have up to 6 months to request a Judgment if necessary. As we have requested the claim, the Court await confirmation from us as to how we wish to proceed. We are happy to enter into an arrangement with the Defendant if they are able/willing to pay off the balance within the 6 month period. This is classed as a Goodwill Payment Arrangement.

 

If the Defendant files a Defence with the Court then the Claim must follow the process as set by the Court. If a payment arrangement is agreed pre judgment then the arrangement (Tomlin) must be registered with the Court. They charge an administration fee of £100.00 to register the Tomlin and this fee is payable by the Defendant. If the Defendant fails to maintain the payment arrangement we are able to request that Judgment is entered in order to enforce payment by alternative means (Charging Order in the case of a homeowner or Attachment of Earnings if the Defendant is employed.)

 

I do hope this email helps to clarify the situation but you have my telephone number if you require any further information.

Does this make sense?
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...