Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have read through a number of similar threads, but one thing i'm not sure how to proceed about is that I live abroad in the middle east and have done for several years. The claim letter was sent to my parents address and I really don't want them to be harassed about this. I am sure I sent the original creditor a registered letter with my change of address but can't find this currently. I am not in a position to pay this, and tend to come back to the UK to see family at most once a year (less since Covid), so not particular bothered about my financial score...more concerned about harassment of my parents. I have not registered on the gov gateway or anything like that.  Details below (as best as i can), and thank you for taking the time to look into it. Also redacted claim form attached: Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre (Northampton) If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group (UK) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 23/5/24   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM Tues, 11/6/24 (19 days)  Thurs, 25/6/24 (33 days)   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The Claimant claims the sum of £7926 for an outstanding debt owed. On 20/4/18 the Defendent entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank for a Credit Card under reference [16 numbers]. On 10/5/22 the Defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £7296. On 28/11/23 the debt of £7296 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925. The Claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) to act on its behalf and the CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £7925   What is the total value of the claim? £8481 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? I believe I sent a letter by registered mail of a change in address to abroad in 2021. Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not personally - probably sent to my parents   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not personally - probably sent to my parents   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Why did you cease payments? Unable to afford, living abroad   What was the date of your last payment? Unsure (probably 2021)   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No     Claim form 23-5-24.pdf
    • While we wait for someone to explain how farage is any better than sunak  .. if not worse   One of many likely upcoming belly laughs   Reform chairman Richard Tice has accused the Tories of (reform like) “dirty tricks” after one of his party’s candidates withdrew his papers to stand at the last minute and endorsed former cabinet minister Sir Gavin Williamson. In a dramatic final 24 hours before nominations closed there had been fevered speculation that as many as six Tory MPs and other candidates could defect to Reform after Nigel Farage decided to stand in Clacton and become leader. But instead no Tories switched and Tom Wellings, the Reform candidate for the new seat of Stone, Great Wryly and Penkridge in Staffordshire, quit and put out a statement endorsing Sir Gavin.   Who does he think he is an Anderson, a Carswell !!! was heard at the reform HQ pub ... as Candidate brushed aside by Farage in clacton to run as an independent    Tice accuses Tories of ‘dirty tricks’ to persuade Reform candidates to stand down WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: A furious row has broken out after a Reform candidate’s last minute defection to the Tories   :ROFL  
    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request?   Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lancashire Mortgage lender not sign agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2466 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is not in connection to your other thread john ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not in connection to your other thread john ?

 

Andy

 

Only in a very indirect way. Had I not purchased the steam engines with this loan then I would not have needed to put the steam engine pieces into storage and therefore would not have had the other case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, as requested I've unapproved your post so that the attachments don't show. Do feel free to remove the account number and post back-up if you like.

 

Did you have any specific questions on this at all?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, that looks good to me, thank you.

 

Let us know if you need any specific input.

 

If this is a case where you are trying to avoid payment because the bank didn't sign the agreement though, that will be a difficult case to run. There was a thread about it not long ago which ran to something like 100 pages.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, as requested I've unapproved your post so that the attachments don't show. Do feel free to remove the account number and post back-up if you like.

 

Did you have any specific questions on this at all?

 

Given that the Lender has not signed the agreement I was wanting views on how it affects the repayment of the total loan facility Cause I and the implications for clause 11. Obviously there is clause 14 as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, that looks good to me, thank you.

 

Let us know if you need any specific input.

 

If this is a case where you are trying to avoid payment because the bank didn't sign the agreement though, that will be a difficult case to run. There was a thread about it not long ago which ran to something like 100 pages.

 

 

No the case is I signed up for a front loaded fixed 5 year mortgage with a total anticipated cost of £38061.80. By LMC not signing they claim its a never ending interest only bridging loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps if you were to explain the problem in full john in your first post..rather than dribs and drabs after each response...you may get some constructive advice.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps if you were to explain the problem in full john in your first post..rather than dribs and drabs after each response...you may get some constructive advice.

 

Andy

 

Its not as simple as that these fraudsters have made so many errors that if I highlighted each one all i would get is a scatter gun response. The key issue is the interest term was for a fixed 12 months followed by 50 capital repayments LMC dispute this so instead of the loan being fully repaid in 2012 for a total amount of 38k LMC believes the total loan outstanding to date is 110K .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats fine.....thats all we require and we also now know about it being treated as a bridging loan...devil is in the detail if you require correct advice on dealing with this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats fine.....thats all we require and we also now know about it being treated as a bridging loan...devil is in the detail if you require correct advice on dealing with this.

 

But there has been no mention of the fact it was a bridging loan by LMC until I complained in 2012 and the loan was fully repaid in Nov 2012. If I wanted a bridging loan I would have used the specific bridging loan company within the Blemain group. What I thought I had was a fixed term 5 year mortgage the clue being in the name Lancashire MORTGAGE Corporation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Okay maybe not the right question given the previous thread on signing agreements. My other query is regarding the transitional arrangements for implementing the 2006 Act. My contract was signed by me in Nov 2007 the Act came into force in 2006 but provisions where drip fed into the legislation. Ie the Section 140 stuff came into force on April 2007 whereas the upper limit of £25000 was abolished in April 2008 however lenders new it was being abolished back in April 2006 so any loans in the transition period should surely reflect the new rules. Or is life not that simple.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Well result of the court case.

 

 

Judge decided that LMC had not signed the agreement and therefore the contract was unenforceable.

 

 

Because it was unenforceable the case for possession was dismissed and LMC where forced to remove the legal charge with Land Registry.

 

 

The Judge then made a judgement for Restitution which is now subject to Appeal based on the interpretation of Clause 14 of the terms and conditions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi john

the loan you had doesnt matter if it was a mortgage or bridging loan because the whole loan is VOID JOHN cos if you search and read more on lancashire/cheshire and blemain you will find loans all wrong and i can only say in 2006, also in 2015

jerrold holdings who is parent of lancashire, cheshire and blemain changed their name to TOGETHER.

 

 

Check 2005 to 2009 loans as ( suffering posted) also about henry moser ,

dont just read small amount on someone read all reports on them and also type in computer about prosecutions and court case

 

 

also a huge blessing reading is BANKS OTHER BLEMAIN FINANCE,

i found this while reading another case on another forum

but i think consumer forum has this also on I tif you tap this in search bar)

 

 

it is shocking i felt very sick when i read more mess ups and more evidence on it you will need to go into a few of the headings once you get int the search ok .

 

 

I know this will all help you my friend and may you be set totally free this time with much happiness given back to you what you have missed and money that is rightfully yours refunded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol suffering is that a joke x hehe you are not alone)

you are not a LOAN ))))))

 

 

this is the first time in rs i can laugh when hear word loan as normally i just think grrrrrrr hell.

 

 

I just looked at the fos you posted link too and i can say many cases went court cos ombudsman cant do MISSOLE AND MISSRESENTATION coshe wrote that on ine and said i cant do them you need court.

 

missold and misrepsentation sorry i must read before i post and check spelling

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need to be very careful how you word your complaint to FOS.

 

 

Even though the FOS refused to take on board my complaint because they deemed it an unregulated loan that did not stop them forwarding all the complaint documents which should have remained personal between myself and the FOS onto Lancashire Mortgage.

 

 

I was therefore very surprised to find all the documents in the trial bundle and the one sided response from LMC to FOS used against me at the trial as "established facts"

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi renewablejohn nice to see you )

 

 

i gave the court paperwork all on fos on my complaints about blemain

 

 

I should think when judge read all of it, the judge was shocked to see the ________ ive had with blemain

 

 

know wonder blemain got served court papers

 

 

i really have come to end of my thether with blemain

i even dream about them awful isnt it

 

 

i get no peace even when i go sleep

 

 

THIS IS WHAT I DREAMPT

i dreampt get all the PEOPLE TOGETHER IN PIT AND BRING THEM OUT,

me do it honestly im shattered as it is, but if its a dream to come to pass i will do this some on this site.

 

 

I really want to hear the word never again blemain in my life or without SCREAMING when i hear their name.

 

i have just read again your remark and i pressed BM mortgage on it and about charges for coming to see you

BLEMAIN CHARGE i think its 150 or 250 to come see youon their visits they have charged

 

 

luckily im not one be charged but i did ask them how much cos i didnt want a bill and i said to them i want to sort this whole thing out

 

 

i sent letter saying so respectfully sort out and within hrs next morning 10am blemain were at my door appointment, but sadly i wasnt heard yet again and had to put them in court, i dont do half release

 

and money back in a few months oh no not while they gain more interest from it etc on my money rightfully mine and i sit and wait like a LEMON and deals given to me with no paperwork sent who does deals like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Just to update. Still waiting for a court date to decide on whether an Appeal will be allowed fortunately the case has been stayed until the case has been heard. Unfortunately a court order does not stop the dirty tricks of Blemain group applying for an order to secure there judgement against my property. Fortunately the judge threw it out once he found out about the court order. Blemain now saying the court are at fault for not sending them a copy of the Court judgement. Funny that the court sent my solicitor a copy of the judgement. Hopefully the case will be heard before Christmas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...