Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive potentially that payment has been made in some form as accompanying evidence to your financial difficulties.     
    • I have just found an email (and checked and verified it on my MCB account online) and I did make a payment to them, but then obvs didn't after that. Will that make any difference to my case? 
    • This is what I have said in my email of complaint:   On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I have found myself in financial difficulty and I contacted you on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months and I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name.  I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this.  What I would like you to do is to please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP. If you fail to resolve my complaint within 8 weeks, or if matters are not settled to my satisfaction, I will have no alternative but to refer my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully, Should I send something along those lines to the CEO? 
    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
    • That "oh dear" doesn't sound good  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA group claim form - old Lloyd's loan 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


chis1230
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2703 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

 

Been a while since I have been on the forum, previous thread was a few years back about link financial and spectrum in the debt management forum.

 

One of my creditors was Lloyds TSB bank loan of £20,000 to clear credit cards, although that never happened but that's another story.

The loan dates back to 2005 and was defaulted in 2007 due to wrong advice from spectrum financial protection, during the time with spectrum, BLS collections collected the payments from spectrum until the debt was assigned to AKTIV KAPITAL PORTFOLIO AS, OSLO,ZUG BRANCH in 2013, and then on to PRA group in 2014, (if I remember right, aktiv changed to pra).

 

This debt is in my wife's name only, and she is very frightened as to where this is going.

Since Aktiv and PRA have been involved with this debt, they have sent letter after letter, every week, and have also been harassed by them from constant phone calls, I mean at least 2 everyday if not 3 for the last 2 years.

 

We have never answered one of them, just pick up their messages, and have never replied to any of their letters.

 

2/6/16 usual threat of court action.

 

25/6/16 letter before claim, they wanted me to acknowledge and answer by the 11/7/16, but I did not.

 

5/7/16 cca request sent to PRA group

 

7/7/16 confirmation of cca request letter from PRA with my £1 postal order returned as they do not require it for my request. (unlike link who previously charged it to my account)

 

29/7/16 claim form

 

To this day we have not received cca from them.

 

We are not disputing that we owe the money to Lloyds and will happily pay at a sensible amount per month, I dispute that I owe PRA money plus the stupid amount of interest on the claim form,

I didn't want it to get this far but guess its to late now

 

outstanding balance - £15,905

Amount claimed - £19008

 

Hope someone can help as don't know what steps to take next, my wife is having kittens in the kitchen at the moment and really wouldn't cope with a court appearance if it comes to that.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Chis

 

Welcome back to CAG

 

Please go here, copy post 1 and fill in the answers..and paste back here for further advice.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED

 

Date of issue – 27 JUL 2016

 

Date of issue 27.07.2016 + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 14.08.2016 + 14 days to submit defence = 28.08.2016 (33 days in total) -

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

The sum of 19008.21 for debt and interest. on 3/3/05 the defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds for a loan under reference ******* .

 

on 30/1/07 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of 15905.00.

 

on 24/6/13 the debt was assigned to aktiv capital, who itself assigned the debt to PRA group

 

on 31/12/14. notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with s136 law of property act 1925.

 

payments of 9.00 received up to 13/2/14

 

and the claimant claims

1. the sum of 15896.00

2. statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum from 13/2/14 to 26/7/16 3112.21 and thereafter at a daily rate of 3.48 until judgment or sooner payment.

 

What is the value of the claim? = £19963.58

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? loan account

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? before

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? not sure, cant find one

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? no

 

Why did you cease payments? sacked dmp spectrum, & made redundant

 

What was the date of your last payment? 13/2/14

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fkofille

Thanks for the swift response, I hope the above is what your looking for.

 

Checked credit report on equifax and it is as clean as a whistle nearly, just one late catalogue payment 2 years ago, absolutely nothing else. In fact the score was excellent and way above the UK average.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ack the claim on mcol website -_AOS box

Defend all

Leave jurisdiction unticked

Get a CPR 31:14 running to the sols

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chis1230

 

I'm watching this with interest. I have plenty of experience with dealing with PRA/Aktiv Kapital and their usual solicitors, Judge & Priestley. Hopefully, I can give you some snippets of advice along the way that may be of use to you in getting the best possible outcome.

 

You need to get a CPR request running on this - also a CCA request, but the one you sent on 5th July may satisfy this. Hopefully some of the others can clarify.

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cca request is valid and pra are now in default so no need to send another and no need to remind them either

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chis1230

 

I'm watching this with interest. I have plenty of experience with dealing with PRA/Aktiv Kapital and their usual solicitors, Judge & Priestley. Hopefully, I can give you some snippets of advice along the way that may be of use to you in getting the best possible outcome.

 

You need to get a CPR request running on this - also a CCA request, but the one you sent on 5th July may satisfy this. Hopefully some of the others can clarify.

 

Sham

 

Sorry! I didn't see DX's post above mine when posting this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all

 

just a few quick questions on the cpr 31:14

 

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored][delete if no such request was delivered]

 

do I include this as I sent cca request prior to proceedings, or am I off track ?

 

and when you say running to the sols dx100uk I assume that's their solicitors yes

 

If so who are they? I see no mention of them on the claim form

 

I have acknowledged the claim, defended all and left jurisdiction unticked,

nearly finished cpr 31:14 just need confirmation on the above before it gets sent recorded in the morning.

 

Thanks for the help once again guys, very much appreciated

 

Sorry guys one more thing, The case number, is that the claim number ?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes deleted that line

 

 

have a look at the other PRA claim threads here

they have their own in house sols.

 

 

yes claimform no.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys

The time has come to submit my defence, well the end of the week anyway, I believe it's Sunday so need to get it submitted on Thursday incase of any website issues, like others have experienced.

 

Have received no response what so ever to my cpr request.

 

Starting to panic now as don't know where to start really, and the Mrs just wants to contact them to avoid court action, I think I have managed to talk her out of it for the time being.

 

I have studied a few recent similar threads and feel for the guys as you can see they have struggled with their defence.

 

I'm guessing my defence will be on the same lines, just tailored to the particulars of my claim

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

copy that into a text based program like notepad

 

the post up as text here

 

so we can edit and advise

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of claim (for reference only)

 

1.The sum of 19008.21 for debt and interest. on 3/3/05 the defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds for a loan under reference ******* .

 

2.On 30/1/07 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of 15905.00.

 

3.On 24/6/13 the debt was assigned to aktiv capital, who itself assigned the debt to PRA group

 

4.On 31/12/14. notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with s136 law of property act 1925.

 

payments of 9.00 received up to 13/2/14

 

and the claimant claims

1. the sum of 15896.00

2. statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum from 13/2/14 to 26/7/16 3112.21 and thereafter at a daily rate of 3.48 until judgment or sooner payment.

 

 

Defence

 

The defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out his case below and relies upon CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted i have in the past had financial dealings with Lloyds however i requested clarity by way of a section 78 request, sent on 5/7/16. The claimant has yet to comply and therefore remains in default.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is denied I do not recall the exact date or nature of any breach Therefore I have sought clarity by way of a CPR 31.14 request sent signed for on 3/08/2016 and showed as received signed for on 5/08/2016. The claimant has yet to comply.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is accepted I do vaguely recall receiving something purporting to be a Notice of Assignment in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925.

 

4. It is therefore at this time denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is therefore put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into the agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show evidence of any breach and service of a Default Notice and subsequent Notices of sums in arrears

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

5. As per civil procedure rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6.On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit act 1974.

 

7.By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks OK

Let andyorch confirm mind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of things i have spotted

Should be s77 for a loan not s78

Not sure you can accept receipt of NoA, however vague and then request in 4(d) proof of assignment, kinda contrdictory but let Andy check

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

chris how much is the court fee and Sol fee?

 

Not happy with the figures varying from post 1 to post 17 ?

 

outstanding balance of 15905.00.

Amount claimed - £19008.00

 

and the claimant claims

1. the sum of 15896.00

2. statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum from 13/2/14 to 26/7/16 3112.21 and thereafter at a daily rate of 3.48 until judgment or sooner payment.

 

What is the value of the claim? = £19963.58

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you need to challenge the £3103.22 section 69 interest...the debt as far as you and the court are concerned is £15905.00. + Court fee 855.37 Legal reps costs 100.00

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I was reading the particulars just then, it dawned on me that the default balance is definitely wrong as I have paperwork from bls collections (who owned debt before pra)

In 2008 and the balance was still 18000 +

 

I'm really confused now with the interest, are you saying that it is calculated wrong or just extortionate, and where should I include it in the defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then the debt balance is £15905.00. and will be argued in your defence along with their section 69 interest.Section 69 8% interest is at the discretion of the court and subject to the District Judge whether its awarded ...in full or partially or even at all.

 

So the defence will require a rewrite to challenge the inflated claimed amount.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...