Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6408 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:mad: Two weeks ago i could smell gas in my house I rang Transco (on the advice of my letting agent)who then condemed my boiler,I then rang my agent who sent a contractor that day.He said there was two leaks but he could only find one of them his advice was to replace the boiler.The next day I contacted the letting agent who informed me they were waiting for the landlord to get back to them because he had to ok the work,this then went on for a further 3 days on that friday the landlord said he wanted to try and fix the boiler the contractor came out that night to get the serial number off the boiler but said he did'nt think it was going to work as the boiler is that old it would be safer to replace the whole thing.We then had to wait another week for the part to come in.The part came in today when the contractor came to fit it, he striped the boiler and said there was no point in fitting the part because the whole boiler needed replacing because he found more faults.So we are now at the point where the whole boiler needs replacing I have three children one of which is 11 weeks old and no heat,does anyone know where I stand as far as paying my rent I have been told that I dont have to pay my rent but that was by the contractor can anyone help.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stopping rent is the LAST resort, as if you fall behind by two months the landlord can seek to legally evict you. If the landlord refuses to replace the boiler (replace, not fix, it's obviously past it and therefore unsafe), go to your local housing officer at the council and raise an urgent complaint. You could also replace the boiler yourself and then reclaim the costs from the landlord if things get really desperate. Nightmare4banks can probably advise you further on the detriment aspect.

 

Good luck.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In are tenancy it states we are not allowed to do any work are selfs it has to go through the agent other wise they will not pay.We were also told to hold £260.00 back by the letting agent but they still expect that back do I have to pay this as my rent is £150.00 per week.thank you for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to claim back the rent for the period where you didn't have hot water and heating as these are necessary for letting a furnished property. As for not getting the work done yourself, you can, if the landlord has been given adequate notice and chance to replace or repair something then you can have it done and reclaim the costs from the rent. You would have to get several quotes for this though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

- Without heating or running hot water, the property was technically uninhabitable. As such, you are entitled to a full refund of the rent for the time you were left without these amenities.

 

- The ABSOLUTE maximum time, IMO, that a tenant should be left without these is 48 hours.

 

- Regardless of what your tenancy states, you have a legal right of offset should the landlord not perform repairs he is obligated to do. This means that you can do the repairs and deduct the amount from the deposit.

 

- Contrary to what is said above, you have no right to have a full replacement, provided any repair is enough to keep the boiler safe.

 

My suggestion would be as follows. Due to the severity of the disrepair, writing a letter is unfeasible. I would telephone the agent, on a mobile with recording functions. Record the conversation you have with them, but ensure that you inform the agent at the beginning of the conversation that you are doing so. In the conversation, inform the LA that within 24 hours of the time of the conversation, you expect the boiler to be replaced or repaired to a safe level. Inform them that should this not occur, you will get 3 estimates for the replacement/repair of the boiler, and if replacement, a statement from the engineer stating that the boiler is beyond economical repair. You will then utilise your legal right of offset to use the engineer with the lowest estimate to replace/repair the boiler, and the total cost of all of this will be deducted from the rent. Also inform them that due to the uninhabitable state of the property for X time period, you will be deducting from the rent payment the payable rent from this period also. Finally inform them that should it get to this stage, you will inform the local housing office and environmental health of the issues.

 

I would not then permit the conversation to go any further. Do not get embroiled in any discussion about these points. If they push, simply state that you are not looking to get their agreement, you are merely informing them of your intentions. After the conversation, send a letter with the same information detailed. If it comes to 24 hours and they have not done anything, do as you have said, sending a COPY of the receipt to the agent, stating that you will only send the original once you have in writing from them their acceptance of the amount deducted from the rent.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Looking to the future, be aware of three things:

 

- Expect to be evicted as soon as possible by a Section 21 notice, which is basically evicted with no reason. You can do nothing about this, and to be honest you are better off out of it.

 

- I would definitely in this situation be withholding the last months rent to cover the deposit, which they will almost certainly try and deduct from.

 

- They may well try and reclaim the money or evict due to rent arrears. In this case, do not worry too much - simply make sure that at every stage you have maintained documentary evidence of proceedings, and you will be able to show these in court. NEVER under any circumstances forward any originals to the agent, always a copy, and also ensure that other than the first call any further communication is made in writing only.

 

- Finally(sorry fourth thing!) be aware of the potential of intimidation and/or harrassment on the part of the agent/landlord. Again, keep documentary evidence of any such offence. Most importantly, if they try to enter the property they have NO legal right to do so without your explicit permission.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the same...don't worry about that. Just assume I meant heating.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on, how can you have hot water without the boiler?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah :)

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need some support contact Shelter: Advice and support you can ring, or email.

 

Good luck, Joan

First letter to halifax sent rec del 26/4

Data Protection Act letter to capital one sent rec del 26/4

Halifax 1st offer dated 5/5

Capital One ack Data Protection Act request rec 6/5

Request for repayment to Capital One 2/8

LBA sent 22/8

Court proceedings issued 13/10

Settled in Full 9/11

Donation made 14/11

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest strangewayofsavin

Hi, ask your LA for a copy of the corgi certificate for the boiler, if they cannot get you a copy or, do not have one, the let is illegal, I would personally, not get the work done, the reason being, it would be very expensive, also you could find yourself in breech of your tenancy agreement, most assured short hold tenancies have a condition that states all repairs to be made by the landlord, if you breech this, they can evict you. As I said ask for the boilers corgi cetificate, and threaten to involve Health & saftey. some advice on boilers is available on the web site hse.gov.uk

Pay your rent, and make a note of the period, and demand a rebate. don't be worried about threatening them with action. All of the tenants rights are available in a leaflet called "tenants and landlords" available from all local authorities or citizens advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incorrect. The tenant has a legal right to do the work and charge the landlord, regardless of what it states in the AST. This does not put him in breach of contract.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...