Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/BW ClaimForm - shop direct cat 'debt'***Claim Dismissed***


kay000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2674 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes Sham.i have checked my credit report and there is no indications of my repayments. just account start date of 15/10/2011, opening balance of £123, then date of default 21/08/2012 and default balance of £123. Before all sorts of charges..

i honestly cant remember the activities of the account clearly, thats why i want to be very cautious. Will it be wise to put a tomlin offer first on the table for the default sum (£123) otherwise demand a supplemental? really would not mind settling the default sum to avoid using my time to attend a hearing,.

 

Though i reason that if the account start date was 15/10/2011 and the payment was monthly and default was 21/08/2012 there certainly would have been payment activites in between the dates don't you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would only submit a supplemental if it is really warranted and has merit and is vital in supporting your initial witness statement, court view could be to disregard it as it becomes tit for tat.

 

Yes the minimum is 3 days

 

Andy

 

Hi Andy, thanks for that. So what will you advise at this stage going forward, i hate to think that the claimant seems to have a upper hand the way it stands now, a Tomlin maybe??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, thanks for that. So what will you advise at this stage going forward, i hate to think that the claimant seems to have a upper hand the way it stands now, a Tomlin maybe??

 

You could prepare a skeleton argument..this can be additional to your witness statement..which would get your further points across to the court at the hearing

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could prepare a skeleton argument..this can be additional to your witness statement..which would get your further points across to the court at the hearing

 

Ok Andy but what bases will i be arguing on, default notices,faulty goods,itemised statement ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Andy but what bases will i be arguing on, default notices,faulty goods,itemised statement ?

 

Is that not already in your main witness statement? I thought you was considering submitting a supplemental WS..because of further matters raised by the claimant in their late WS ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that not already in your main witness statement? I thought you was considering submitting a supplemental WS..because of further matters raised by the claimant in their late WS ?

 

No Andy,

i have been reading claimants WS and seems to me that there was no other issues apart from them not supplying the itemised statement, a default notice and how the arrived at amount with legality of charges.

 

Please tell me is a tomlin without prejudice .. and what could be the likely response to a Tomlin request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that not already in your main witness statement? I thought you was considering submitting a supplemental WS..because of further matters raised by the claimant in their late WS ?

 

You advised Kay not to send a supplemental WS, Andy (unless it added value). Would it be beneficial to draw attention to the £300-odd of default charges prior to any hearing, or address it there and then and hope for the best? (leaving aside the returns dispute for a minute)

 

I'm also mindful that Kay has mentioned several times that they don't want to go to court, so maybe another WS would lay some groundwork for a favourable settlement offer.....or could this simply be mentioned as part of any settlement discussions. Something tells me that Lowell won't back down much on this anyway due to the relatively low claim amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it adds value then by all means submit either a skeleton or a supplemental WS to refute the points raised....but time is of the essence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the panic to submit Witness Statement by 19th October if the hearing is so far away?

 

Part of the directions Sham.....ours is not to question why:roll:

 

"Notably,

that each party must deliver to the other party and to the court office copies of all documents on which that party intends to rely on no later than 19/10/16

 

that the documents to be sent to the other party and the court must include the statements of all witnesses(including the parties themselves)"

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Andy. I just found it strange that there was such a large gap between disclosure and the hearing...couldn't remember if directions had been posted up. :-)

 

Thanks all.i actually now cant lay my hands on the directions any more seems i have lost it. Will need to call the court to have another sent so i can post it here. mean time any suggestion on my next actions? any advise really appreciated,.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally thinking of writing a very robust Tomlin with any help here as i have'nt done that before.

 

It is normally the claimant that drafts the Tomlin Order...not the defendant...but you can negotiate its contents if not happy.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is normally the claimant that drafts the Tomlin Order...not the defendant...but you can negotiate its contents if not happy.

 

Andy

 

Thanks Andy,but how do i initiate it? i mean do i just write to the claimant asking it to consider an out of court settlement for xx amount without charges ,?

i have researched some threads here but have not stumbled on any with this order,.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply inform the claimant that you " may " be open to settlement subject to amount and conditions and would consider wrapping this up by way of a Tomlin Order...if they are in agreement...then the balls in their court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply inform the claimant that you " may " be open to settlement subject to amount and conditions and would consider wrapping this up by way of a Tomlin Order...if they are in agreement...then the balls in their court.

 

Thanks Andy. guess the header will be "without prejudice", as i hope it won't influence or be used as an exhibit in court just in case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy. guess the header will be "without prejudice", as i hope it won't influence or be used as an exhibit in court just in case?

 

Header ? Simply ring them and suggest it...assuming this is the way you want conclude the matter

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Header ? Simply ring them and suggest it...assuming this is the way you want conclude the matter

 

ok thanks Andy,but really not too many options or is there? . will leave updates cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would personally send the settlement offer via email. Perhaps ask if they would consider reaching an amicable settlement outside of court. See what figure, if any, they suggest. They may knock £50 or something of that nature off, but you can return with something like... "Having considered all aspects of the claim, I feel a settlement figure of [for example] £150 would reflect a fair outcome for both parties." Then see what they say.

 

If you get no joy then I'd personally hit them with a supplemental Witness Statement that directly challenges the legal nature of £300-odd charges that have been applied to the account. Then see if they're any more amenable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Sham and apologies for taking this long to acknowledge, 'urgent private matter'.

 

 

Please see below draft for offer i intend to mail to claimant tomorrow and kindly advise, thanks..

 

Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

 

c/o Bwlegal

 

Claim number xxxxxx

 

Re Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd V xxxx

 

 

Offer of out of court settlement

 

I am hereby writing to notify you that i may be open to an out of court settlement for

 

the above claim subject to amount of claim and condition of payment and will consider

 

sealing an amicable agreement by way of a Tomlin order.

 

I make this offer with the intention of both parties saving time a further resources on this case.

 

I look forward to your reasonable consideration of this offer.

 

yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all. so i made an out of court offer of £150 which was turned down and claimant asked for an improved offer if possible,

any thoughts on this pls. also advised that a Tolim order attracts a £100 pound fee so may be better off with other agreement. pls is this

true/advisable, anybody kindly advise,.? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...