Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim Issued Out Of Juristuction? reply from defendant - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2742 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am trying to pursue a company in Scotland via small claims court,

I have received the paperwork back today

 

Subject : Claims Issued Out Of Jurisdiction

 

Please find enclosed claim forms returned to you for service,

As this is a claim form to be issues out of the jurisdiction of the court.

Money Claims Centre no longer servers the claim form direct to the defendant.

The money Claims Centre has received this guidance from Court Business Support and as directed by a District Judge.

Rule 6.4b of the cilic Procedure Rules only refer to general service by first class post

to a jurisdiction within England and Wales and does not apply to foreign process.

There is no provision to serve papers to addresses outside England and Wales

 

I have rang PSU in Liverpool who in my opinion wasn't overly helpful

 

in the pack returned I have :-

 

Notice of issue (Duplicate)

- I believe I keep this and fill in the missing dates of when sent, when it was received and date to reply

Copy of claim form and submitted evidence - which I send to defendant

N510 form - do I send that to the defendant ?

Response form - which I assume the defendant needs to ?

 

I need to know if I can put all the paperwork in the post and send via recorded method ?

I need to know how many days I have to give the defendant to reply ?

 

I know this is urgent and need to deal with it ASAP thanks for your support

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LL - Welcome back to CAG.

 

I have asked one of my colleagues on the site team to respond accordingly.

They will be along shortly.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to CCMCC as a long shot and was amazed !

what a wonderful and helpful gentleman I spoke to,

when ever I have had to speak to anyone in UK courts or solicitors

they simply scratch theit heads and say not sure what do to

 

the gentleman answered all my points politely, accurately, and was a very positive person to deal with,

all the information is shared below in case anyone else is in a similar situation

 

Notice of issue is to be kept by the claiment

 

Notice of Issue to be filled in with date you sent paper work in my case today 26/04/2016

then the date they are deemed to be served 2 day's after sending in my case 28/04/2016

and date the defendant has to reply by in UK it's 14 days

due to my defendant in Scotland they have 21 days so in my case 17/05/2016

 

The form N510 should of been kept by the court to inform them where everything is going,

I was advised to keep hold of this myself

 

if you ever need to serve court papers yourself for any reason you will need form N215

which is a declaration to the court describing how you served the paper's to the defendant

 

The original call to PSU explained my case for £1100+ was not worth pursuing due to how much it could cost me

to serve papers via bailiff's ect (HOW WRONG HE WAS!)

 

Sending paperwork to Scotland via post is fine,

I even upgraded the service to first class recorded (although first class service is accepted)

it's just the courts will only send files to address's in England and Wales

 

Just off now to the post office to send everything

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

just a little update, the defendant has give a responce, think he gave a 2/3 line statement with a covering letter from a third party

 

defence - the Quad bike was not sold by me, the buyer was clearly aware that the seller was a third party

 

Letter enclosed - I sold the quad bike to the claimant, it should of been obvious the quad bike was in my name on the V5, my friend dealt with the sale on my behalf, all the money take was then paid directly to a finance company, letter not signed

 

 

The actual purchase was made from A Company LTD, my credit card payment was taken by A Company LTD I was not given any receipts at the point of sale, when I finally did get a receipt it was on A company LTD letterhead stating half way down the page the sale was a private sale between myself and the registered keeper (named on the logbook)

 

I have never met anyone other than the owner of A Company LTD the quad bike was collected from A Company LTD and all funds half credit card and half cash were paid to A company LTD

 

I have declined the court's offer of mediation as I have already attempted private mediation, the seller of the quad is adamant he did not sell the quad and his response to letter before action started please take me to court so they can see this sale for what it really is

 

will await a hearing date which I guess is the next step

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will be your Directions Questionnaire that you refer to.......Notice of Allocation and directions next Luke.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that sounds about right, I filled in all the form's sent to me (they arrived saturday) all filled in and returned, the defendant I'm hoping is going to get a massive shock in court (small claims) when the judge seen's the receipt given to me was from Mr A's Company LTD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you also served a copy of the DQ on the defendant ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I am reading everything online at the moment but some of it is a complete minefield, I requested a judgment default for my case, I live in England (Liverpool) and defendant lives in scotland

 

CCMCC stated

 

applicastion be refused. The Claimant needs to comply with Rule 12.10 and 12PD paragraph 4.3 & 4.5

 

Rule 12.10 just refers to judgment out of jurisdiction

 

12PD I am reading now

 

These are the things I have been told to view

12.10 The claimant must make an application in accordance with Part 23 where –

(a) the claim is –

(i) a claim against a child or protected party; or

(ii) a claim in tort by one spouse or civil partner against the other.

(b) the claimant wishes to obtain a default judgment where the defendant has failed to file an acknowledgment of service –

(i) against a defendant who has been served with the claim out of the jurisdiction under rule 6.32(1), 6.33(1), 6.33(2) or 6.33(2B); (service where permission of the court is not required under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 19824);

(ii) against a defendant domiciled in Scotland or Northern Ireland or in any other Convention territory or Member State;

(iii) against a State;

(iv) against a diplomatic agent who enjoys immunity from civil jurisdiction by virtue of the Diplomatic Privileges Act 19645; or

(v) against persons or organisations who enjoy immunity from civil jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of the International Organisations Acts 1968 and 19816.

 

12PD

4.3 On an application where the defendant was served with the claim either:

(1) outside the jurisdiction7 without leave under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, the 2005 Hague Convention, the Lugano Convention or the Judgments Regulation, or

(2) within the jurisdiction but when domiciled8 in Scotland or Northern Ireland or in any other Convention territory9 or Member State,

and the defendant has not acknowledged service, the evidence must establish that:

(a) the claim is one that the court has power to hear and decide,

(b) no other court has exclusive jurisdiction under the Act, the 2005 Hague Convention, the Lugano Convention or Judgments Regulation to hear and decide the claim, and

© the claim has been properly served in accordance with Article 20 of Schedule 1 to the Act, Article 9© of the 2005 Hague Convention, Article 26 of the Lugano Convention, paragraph 15 of Schedule 4 to the Act, or Article 26 of the Judgments Regulation

 

4.5 Evidence in support of an application referred to in paragraphs 4.3 and 4.4 above must be by affidavit.

 

underlined the parts that are applicable to my case in 12.10 but still unsure what I have done wrong

 

still very confused with all this, the biggest thing I can't understand is

 

by affidavit

 

who do I need to speak with to get an affidavit?

 

I have now found 2 forms, EX550 and N285 the N285 has very little information on it like I should write something in it? do I fill these forms in myself or do I have to get a legal professional to fill them in ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default judgment obtained by making an application

 

12.10 The claimant must make an application in accordance with Part 23 where –

(a) the claim is –

(i) a claim against a child or protected party; or

(ii) a claim in tort by one spouse or civil partner against the other.

(b) the claimant wishes to obtain a default judgment where the defendant has failed to file an acknowledgment of service –

(i) against a defendant who has been served with the claim out of the jurisdiction under rule 6.32(1), 6.33(1), 6.33(2) or 6.33(2B); (service where permission of the court is not required under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 19824);

(ii) against a defendant domiciled in Scotland or Northern Ireland or in any other Convention territory or Member State;

(iii) against a State;

(iv) against a diplomatic agent who enjoys immunity from civil jurisdiction by virtue of the Diplomatic Privileges Act 19645; or

(v) against persons or organisations who enjoy immunity from civil jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of the International Organisations Acts 1968 and 19816.

 

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part12

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 23 is with regards to making applications in general.

 

12.10 is as above and is CPR 12

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Service Out of the Jurisdiction

 

The rules for service of legal proceedings outside the jurisdiction differ for companies and individuals located outside the jurisdiction. In some rare circumstances, the Court may dispense with service in the usual way, however the court would need to be satisfied that there are good grounds for doing so.

The rules governing service out of the jurisdiction can be divided into two parts those where permission of the court is required and where permission is not required.

Permission not required

Scotland and Northern Ireland

 

A claimant may serve a claim form out of the jurisdiction on a defendant in Scotland or Northern Ireland, and that service can be so carried out without permission of the Court. Thereafter, the Claimant may proceed to serve other court documents by the same method as used for serving documents in the jurisdiction, for instance by first-class post. This is an exception to the general rule that service must be affected in accordance with the law of the receiving country.

Obtaining Judgment in Default against a Defendant who lives or carries out their business in Scotland and enforcement of the Judgment

 

Legal Systems in the UK

 

When and why will this arise?

England and Wales operate under a different legal system to Scotland. In many cases it will be permissible to commence proceedings against a Defendant who lives or carries out their business in Scotland but necessary to enforce the judgment in Scotland, since that is where the Defendant’s assets are located.

Special rules apply where a Claimant wishes to obtain judgment in default in England or Wales in either a County Court or the High Court and then enforce that judgment in Scotland.

The time for responding to a Claim Form and Particulars of Claim where the Defendant lives or carries out their business in Scotland is 21 days from the date of deemed service. If the Defendant fails to respond within that time it is open to the

 

Claimant to apply for judgment in default.

How to apply for judgment in default

 

Where the Defendant lives or carries out their business in Scotland the following have to be sent to the English or Welsh Court in which the proceedings were commenced in order to obtain judgment in default:

An application for judgment in default

 

Form N244, which can be obtained from the Court office or from the Court Service’s website, should be used.

The application will be dealt with without the need for a hearing and should include the following information:

 

• That the Claimant intends to apply for an Order, a draft of which should be attached, that the Claimant be permitted under CPR 12.10(b)(i) to enter judgment in default for the sum claimed together with interest and costs because:

o The Defendant is domicile in Scotland;

o The Claim has been properly served in accordance with CPR 6.19(1);

o The Defendant has not filed an Acknowledgment of Service or a Defence and the relevant period for doing so has expired;

o The Defendant has not satisfied the claim;

o The Defendant has not filed an Admission;

o The claim is one that the Court has power to hear and decide;

o No other Court has exclusive jurisdiction under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 or the Judgments Regulation to hear and decide the claim.

 

An affidavit in support of the application

 

The affidavit should comply with the formalities of Practice Direction 32 to the Civil Procedure Rules and should contain the following information:

 

That the affidavit is made in support of the Claimant’s application for Judgment in Default made pursuant to CPR 12.10(b)(i);

 

• The date upon which the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim were issued;

• A statement confirming that the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim were properly served on the Defendant in accordance of the laws of Scotland, namely by recorded delivery post (the normal method of service in Scotland) and the date upon which they were served. (A Certificate of Service should be exhibited to the affidavit);

 

• The date the Defendant had until to file an Acknowledgement of Service or a Defence;

• A statement confirming that the Defendant has failed to file an Acknowledgement of Service or a Defence;

• A statement confirming that the Defendant has not satisfied the claim;

• A statement confirming that the Defendant has not filed an Admission;

• A statement that the claim is one that the Court has power to hear and decide;

• Brief details as to what the claim is about and why the English or Welsh Court has jurisdiction to hear and decide the claim;

• A statement confirming that no other Court has exclusive jurisdiction under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 or the Judgments Regulation to hear and decide the claim;

• If the Defendant is an individual, his or her date of birth, if known.

 

 

A draft order

 

Form N24 can be used, a copy of which can be obtained from the Court office or found on the Court Service’s website. The draft order needs simply to say that the Claimant has been given permission to enter judgment in default pursuant to CPR 12.10(b)(i).

 

The court fee

 

The Court fee payable is the Court fee payable for without notice applications. The amount of the Court fee can be found on the Court Service’s website.

How to apply for a certified copy of the judgment to register in Scotland

Once judgment in default has been obtained it is necessary to apply to the English or Welsh Court where the proceedings were commenced for a certified copy of the judgment to register in Scotland. In order to obtain a certified copy of the judgment the following need to be sent to the Court:

 

An application for a certified copy of the judgment

Form N244 should be used.

The application will be dealt with without the need for a hearing and should state that the Claimant intends to apply for the issue of a certificate of judgment to register for enforcement in Scotland because the judgment remains unsatisfied and provision for the issue of a certificate of judgment is made by Schedule 6 to the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 and CPR 74.17.

An witness statement in support of the application

The witness statement should comply with the formalities of Practice Direction 32 to the Civil Procedure Rules and should contain the following information:

 

• That the witness statement is made in support of the Claimant’s application for the issue, in accordance with Schedule 6 to the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, of a certificate of judgment to register for enforcement in Scotland;

• The name and address of the judgment creditor;

• The name and address of the judgment debtor;

• The sum payable and unsatisfied under the money provisions of the judgment;

• The amount of interest accrued to the date of the application;

• A statement confirming that the judgment is not stayed.

 

A draft certificate

 

Form 111 should be used, a copy of which can be obtained from the Court office or found on the Court Service’s website.

 

The court fee

 

The Court fee payable is the Court fee payable for without notice applications. The amount of the Court fee can be found on the Court Service’s website.

Registration of the judgment in Scotland and enforcement of the judgment

Once the certificate of the judgment has been received from the court it will be necessary to register the judgment in Scotland and take enforcement action. The procedure for registration of a judgment and enforcement in Scotland is governed by Scottish law and, therefore, beyond the remit of this website. Ordinarily a solicitor working in England or Wales would refer the case to Scottish lawyers at this stage.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you Andy I will read all this in the morning step by step, it's all new information not something I have found in my search's as this is the last step before judgment a lot of time effort and money has been outlaid so far, I really don't want to fall at the last hurdle

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you Andy I will read all this in the morning step by step, it's all new information not something I have found in my search's as this is the last step before judgment a lot of time effort and money has been outlaid so far, I really don't want to fall at the last hurdle

 

:thumb:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...