Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How about posting the full email, rather than just the bits you want us to see??
    • Hi Folks,   Thank you for your help so far. Please find below the correspondence so far from various parties. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Again, apologies for not posting the correct stuff. I thought I'd lost it all, turns out it was on a rarely used pc Letter advising of change of address will be posted shortly, with proof of posting not tracked. Buncrana 1 Edited Notice To Keeper ECP.pdf 2 ECP Back of PCN.pdf 3 DRP Edited 25012021.docx 4 DRP Back of letter.docx 5 POPLA Appeal redacted.pdf 6 DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf ESSO Cobham Signage.pdf
    • Thanks just looked at SARequest It wouldn’t make ebay have to say why they suspended me. all their email said was that it was related to buying activity. But under that bike buying activity there are about five different reasons why it could’ve been. But they haven’t specified which of these five reasons it was.
    • Thank you Ethel, their letter was literally one line, with an added bonus of a typo..... "As you own the land that the property was damaged on we would not be able to dela with that aspect of the claim.", so I think it may be the initial fob off. I have replied just stating "This is not correct, the fence is owned by XYZ ltd, please clarify?", but will follow it up with a letter from the company. will let you know how I get on x
    • About a year ago i was summonsed to court for a speeding offence, long story short it wasn't me that was driving the vehicle, and i successfully proved that i had not received any paperwork (the reason it went to a summons) because there is a problem with our address, i live at number 7, yet when you look online to enter our address for anything you have 7, 5-7 and 7-9 on our street, one is my address and two are businesses.  The court ruled that there was an issue, and agreed i did not receive any paperwork (aside from me not being the driver)  i thought it odd that i never received anything in the post to say that, but they are the courts i assumed everything would be in order. Now just recently i have been using family members vehicles to get to work and have been insuring the vehicles on a temporary basis. Recently when using a comparison website i would get results and then when i went to make payment it would not let me advance, i had tried this on numerous sites and the same happened, i assumed that it would have been because i have used to many temporary insurances and it may have flagged for whatever reason. i went to check my license online, and i cant view it, it states below, i called the DVLA and they can not view any details either and have said they will need to raise a case internally to find out what has happened.  My wife and brother seem to think that the courts have screwed up not informed the DVLA of anything, hence i was banned. But surely it wouldn't have taken so long for me to stop being able to insure my vehicle on a temporary basis until just now?? Please can anyone assist as im worried sick now and ive done absolutely nothing wrong, i need my license for my job. .................... It has not been possible to display/match your driving licence. For further information regarding your driving licence details write to: Central Casework Group, Drivers Enquiries, DVLA, Swansea, SA6 7JL
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Lowell sols claimform - old orange mobile 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Need some help please.

 

Have received a summons from the Bulk Handling Centre for an old Orange Mobile Debt - About 4 years old roughly.

 

Date of Issue: 06/04/16 - Acknowledged - 08/04/16

 

Details of claim;

 

Claimant: Lowell Portfolio Ltd

 

Defendant myself

 

POC

 

(1) - The defendant entered into an agreement with Orange under account reference xxxxxxxx ("the agreement").

(2) - The defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

(3) - The agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 19/06/2014 and notice given to the Defendant.

(4) - Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £176.54 remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims;

(a) The said sum of £176.54

(b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.039, but limited to one year, being £14.12

© Costs

 

I have acknowledged the Service online with MCOL.

 

I'm no expert here but I've been reading through other threads and it seems the wording is incorrect on the claim form, being it was a Contract for Services rather than an Agreement.

 

Am I still able to send a CPR Request in order to get their ownership of said debt?

 

Can someone please help me a little. I'm drafting documents as I type this but running into a little blank moment from reading so many comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome to CAG

 

If you could read the following link and then copy and paste your responses back here to enable the best advice on how to proceed with claim.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ?Lowell Portfolio 1 LTD

 

Date of issue –. - 06/04/2016

 

Date of issue - 06/04/16

 

What is the claim for –

 

(1) - The defendant entered into an agreement with orange under account reference xxxxxxxx ("the agreement").

(2) - The defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

(3) - The agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 19/06/2014 and notice given to the Defendant.

(4) - Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £176. remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims;

(a) The said sum of £176.

(b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.039, but limited to one year, being £14.12

© Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? - - £266

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Mobile Phone

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - After 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Lowell

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I suspect so but it was about 4 years or so back and can't honestly remember

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? - Came out of work and couldn't make payments, circumstances

 

What was the date of your last payment? Don't know

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

Had telephone conversations with Orange at the time, restricted the phone usage but I just couldn't make payments.

As I recall I think I offered payments of £10 per month but they just would not help and eventually just became very harassing.

 

I hope this is everything you need.

Edited by pickpocket
change figures
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks PP

 

Okay so CPR 31.14 to the Claimants Sols named on the claim form.....follow the instruction provided within the template.

 

In the meantime try to find out your last payment date (old statements or even call Orange/EE) and try to establish if the amount claimed consists of any unfair charges.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would assume that the Sols are Lowell's own in house sols.....so send it to the claimants address.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Friday the 6th May is the last date to submit by.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who on earth is spacedood??

 

I wonder ? :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter arrived this morning from Lowell Sols.

 

Verbatim

 

"Thank you for your letter of 9th April 2016

 

We can confirm that your request for documents has been forwarded to our client and we will forward the documents to you upon receipt however it is unlikely to be within the seven day deadline of your letter.

 

Please be advised that this account is a telecommunications account and therefore is it not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and so consequently our client is not under an obligation to provide a copy of the agreement.

 

Please note that legal proceedings have now been issued and we confirm receipt of your Acknowledgement of Service on the 14th April 2016. From this date you have an extra 14 days to file a response to the claim form.

 

If this is not done a County Court Judgement may be entered against you.

 

We look forward to hearing from you."

 

As they have referenced an "Agreement" in their POC, surely they are obliged to provide one? Not getting hung up on this but it just seems as though they don't have a clue what they're doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreement...contract...either way it is not regulated as stated in their response...so you should have removed it from your CPR 31.14 request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy,

 

Please see my defense below, I would be grateful if you would give it a once over for me?

 

"Me Lowell Solicitors Ltd

PO Box 1419

Northampton

NN2 1BU

Claim Number: XXXXXXXX

Sir,

Please find below my defence in regards the case of Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd ‘v’ “ME”

 

1. Paragraph 1 - The Defendant contends that there had been some dealings with Orange in the past but denies any such agreement with the Claimant, the particulars of claim are generic and vague in nature and as such the claimant must particularise it’s claim in full. The defendant denies having entered into an agreement with the claimant but had previously had dealings with Orange on a Contract for Services basis. The Claimant is yet to disclose any such “Agreement”.

 

2. Paragraph 2 – The defendant denies being served with any such default notice.

 

3. The defendant denies owing any monies to the Claimant and denies any such notice being received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

(d) put to strict proof to provide assignment in writing signed by the assignor at time of alleged assignment.

 

As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of cliam.

 

On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Yours faithfully

ME

Cc – Northampton County Court Bulk Handling Centre"

 

PP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim

 

(1) - The defendant entered into an agreement with orange under account reference xxxxxxxx ("the agreement").

(2) - The defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

(3) - The agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 19/06/2014 and notice given to the Defendant.

(4) - Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £176. remains due and outstanding.

 

And the Claimant claims;

(a) The said sum of £176.

(b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.039, but limited to one year, being £14.12

© Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? - - £266

 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1.Paragraph 1 It is accepted that a contractual relationship did once exist with orange on a Contract for Services basis in the past, but I do not recall any alleged balances outstanding with particularity.

 

2.Paragraph 2 – The defendant denies being served with any such default notice.

 

3.Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1)

 

 

Therefore the defendant denies owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

(d) put to strict proof to provide assignment in writing signed by the assignor at time of alleged assignment.

 

As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of claim.

 

Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract. OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

One mobile Phone defence...you do not require address and yours sincerely etc if submitting through MCOL....just the above as it is...if you are in agreement.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:wink: no need to submit the red particulars.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a letter from Lowell Sols which basically says they have had no response and no reason from me for not making payment or why I shouldn't have to.

 

I'm questioning myself here now but there no need for me to send the defence to Sols is there? Submission final date is Friday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Northampton send a copy of your defence to the claimant.....it will be a computerised threat o gram.....ignore.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...