Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • anonymous1975
      DVLA Cannot show my driving license information

      By anonymous1975 · Posted

      Ok i think we may have the issue, so its been just over 6 months since i was banned and when i defended the case and it should have been rescinded. I have just spoken to the courts, and they informed the DVLA that the ban should have been overturned. Now you need to reapply for your license when you have been banned, and they give a window of 45 days i believe after it has expired. The dates add up, what i think has happened is that my details have been removed from the system because i was banned for 6 months (when i shouldn't have been) and the additional days on top. If this is the case then i surely i can sue these idiots until the cows come home, i have been driving whilst banned (again when i shouldn't have been)  and this can affect my job, imagine i had been pulled over with my son in the car, they would have just arrested me and not listened to a word of my story.  
    • Ethel Street
      DVLA Cannot show my driving license information

      By Ethel Street · Posted

      First thing to do is what the the DVLA website extract says - write to the Central Casework Group with full details of your licence, adding that you spoke to DVLA call centre xx/xx/xxxx and they told you they couldn't see the details either.  Get proof of posting. Are you in physical possession of your Driving Licence Photocard? And the card shows it is still current? If so include a photocopy of it when you write to DVLA. There's no reason for you to assume that the licence has been cancelled or that you have been banned. Just some IT problem at DVLA. I wouldn't go into all the stuff about your court case last year. There's no evidence that the current glitch in the DVLA system is anything to do with it and it will just muddy the waters.  Most comparision sites ask for your licence number. You can get quotes without the licence being checked but when you take up an insurer's quote they then check your licence number against the DVLA website to make sure it is valid and to check if any Points for motoring offences are recorded. If you are unable to access your licence details on DVLA then insurers won't be able to either so they will refuse to proceed and cancel their quote. 
    • Nicky Boy
      Issue with my Ebay account which they have suspended

      By Nicky Boy · Posted

      How about posting the full email, rather than just the bits you want us to see??
    • Buncrana
      EPC/DCBL PCN - appealed - MFG Esso Cobham

      By Buncrana · Posted

      Hi Folks,   Thank you for your help so far. Please find below the correspondence so far from various parties. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Again, apologies for not posting the correct stuff. I thought I'd lost it all, turns out it was on a rarely used pc Letter advising of change of address will be posted shortly, with proof of posting not tracked. Buncrana 1 Edited Notice To Keeper ECP.pdf 2 ECP Back of PCN.pdf 3 DRP Edited 25012021.docx 4 DRP Back of letter.docx 5 POPLA Appeal redacted.pdf 6 DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf ESSO Cobham Signage.pdf
    • mamothd
      Issue with my Ebay account which they have suspended

      By mamothd · Posted

      Thanks just looked at SARequest It wouldn’t make ebay have to say why they suspended me. all their email said was that it was related to buying activity. But under that bike buying activity there are about five different reasons why it could’ve been. But they haven’t specified which of these five reasons it was.

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

HPH2/Cohen Claim Form barclaycard 'debt'***Settled by Tomlin Order***

isbo

By isbo
in Legal Successes

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2758 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 445
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

AndyOrch
AndyOrch

So when your in court inform the judge that the claimant has failed to comply with his directions and failed to disclose any documents or witness statement on you...so barred from relying on any docum

AndyOrch
AndyOrch

MB is correct always use the claimants failure to comply with directions to your advantage...and request sanctions be imposed...never contact the Solicitor and give them the heads up of their failings

jackreacher
jackreacher

I also agree what MB proposes should happen.. However The reality for me and many others was different. For my first 3 cases I played it the 'don't tell them' way... No real joy the claimants did

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
Like I said, it's a fair point. Please don't be angry with me for it, I am sorry that my reaction to stressful situations reacts that way. Others lash out, this is my way.

am not angry :)

i've helped you on the way. and wish you all the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites
jaycwl

jaycwl

Posted
Posted
I heard nothing until today Ford. I've received a letter today saying it's been adjourned until October the xth, and to provide evidence of my illness, which is fine. Should I now make an effort to reach a settlement in full (would they let me pay this in installments?)?

 

This is why they do it mate, because people get frightened and give in last minute then pay. Just my opinion and im relatively new here but see what the rest think.

Link to post
Share on other sites
isbo

isbo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
This is why they do it mate, because people get frightened and give in last minute then pay. Just my opinion and im relatively new here but see what the rest think.

That's a good call jaycwl, never thought of it like that. I'm too naive...

Link to post
Share on other sites
jackreacher

jackreacher

Posted
Posted

Keep demanding the original documents....you will note at point 6 the court has ordered the ORIGINAL documents are brought to court. Keep contesting the prescribed terms and conditions are not what you signed and they need to bring the originals..

 

Do not let them bring anything other than the ORIGINALS.. Write and email them and point out the Court has ordered the Originals and you demand they obey the Courts orders.

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

Not court

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
jackreacher

jackreacher

Posted
Posted

The Claimant has been ordered to bring the Originals..not copies to court on the day . Write to the claimants solicitor pointing this out, thereby making them aware you know they must bring the original documentation

 

and you need the originals as you believe what they have provided is not the same agreement as Originally signed.

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

all what I received is in post 196 [20 pages]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
martin2006

martin2006

Posted
Posted

Hi Isbo, bearing in mind this is BC, there is plenty of history of them leaving it till the very last minute, ive heard very little with my BC case, albeit i'm taking them to court, still had no comms since failed mediation a few months ago.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mercyblue

mercyblue

Posted
Posted
The Claimant has been ordered to bring the Originals..not copies to court on the day . Write to the claimants solicitor pointing this out, thereby making them aware you know they must bring the original documentation

 

and you need the originals as you believe what they have provided is not the same agreement as Originally signed.

 

Why on Earth would you write to their solicitors telling them they need to follow the court directions? If they don't follow them that's their problem and you could use their failure to your advantage in court.

In view that they have been ordered to produce the original in court how could they possibly provide the defendant with the original?

Link to post
Share on other sites
jackreacher

jackreacher

Posted
Posted (edited)
Why on Earth would you write to their solicitors telling them they need to follow the court directions? If they don't follow them that's their problem and you could use their failure to your advantage in court.

In view that they have been ordered to produce the original in court how could they possibly provide the defendant with the original?

 

In my opinion always best to do it this way,, Firstly it may be the thing that makes them pull out...then on the day when they claim to have overlooked that particular point your case is based on the actual Originals and they have brought genuine Original copies instead ,,you can then turn round with a letter and hand it to the judge. Forcing the judge to make a decision. He has ordered them to be produced and they have disobeyed despite the defendant reminding them.

 

 

 

If you just turn up on the day without that letter the judge is less likely to adjourn or give you the win, when they have after all brought so called genuine original copies.

 

Also If they are claiming they are genuine copies of the original there needs to be a signed sheet confirming this by the department head. I can give you more details of this nearer the time . Hopefully this wont happen.

 

The more points you can get in your favour the better.

Edited by Andyorch
edited

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

MB is correct always use the claimants failure to comply with directions to your advantage...and request sanctions be imposed...never contact the Solicitor and give them the heads up of their failings.

 

Andy

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

agree. the order was to send copies 14 days prior (they failed to do that. then at the judges discretion no. 7), and then bring originals to the hearing (wonder if they did bring originals to the hearing, the claimant was represented. and what representations were made by the claimant. whether they were told off. at least costs were reserved).

it was adjourned, so the current order still stands. leave it with them to comply or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
jackreacher

jackreacher

Posted
Posted (edited)
MB is correct always use the claimants failure to comply with directions to your advantage...and request sanctions be imposed...never contact the Solicitor and give them the heads up of their failings.

 

Andy

 

 

I also agree what MB proposes should happen.. However The reality for me and many others was different.

For my first 3 cases I played it the 'don't tell them' way... No real joy the claimants didn't give a monkeys about the orders and neither did the judge despite him writing them.

 

I do think if I was represented it would have held some sway but as an LIP ?

 

'They had no excuse as we had written several times before the hearing so they had due warning' The judge agreed they won the case.

 

I did a similar approach for the wife over the original full agreement with a similar successful result. That's not to say the same thing would definitely happen the next time, but I personally would adopt the open approach for myself should the need occur.

 

At the end of the day they either will be producing the agreement or not, despite any letter I write...the letter just puts things in your favour if they don't.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
  • Like 1

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites
martin2006

martin2006

Posted
Posted

Maybe a combination of both approaches would be prudent.

 

Without giving a heads up, the letter reminding them of originals requirement could be sent once into the 14 day period before the hearing.

 

Lets them know you know what was required, but leaves them no time to deal with it.

 

Just thoughts out loud.

  • Like 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
jackreacher

jackreacher

Posted
Posted
Maybe a combination of both approaches would be prudent.

 

Without giving a heads up, the letter reminding them of originals requirement could be sent once into the 14 day period before the hearing.

 

Lets them know you know what was required, but leaves them no time to deal with it.

 

Just thoughts out loud.

 

Sounds like a plan .. interesting to chew the fat over approaches. The courts seem to appreciate a more open cards on the table approach.

 

'They had no excuse as we had written several times before the hearing so they had due warning' The judge agreed they won the case.

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites
mercyblue

mercyblue

Posted
Posted
Maybe a combination of both approaches would be prudent.

 

Without giving a heads up, the letter reminding them of originals requirement could be sent once into the 14 day period before the hearing.

 

Lets them know you know what was required, but leaves them no time to deal with it.

 

Just thoughts out loud.

 

But what would be the point Martin? Send them a letter telling them I have read the directions? I really don't get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
isbo

isbo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Please don't think I've been ignoring you, I did post replies but they've disappeared. The point is they didn't comply with the original 14 day requirement and it still wasn't chucked out on the day, so why would they fret over the originals request? it's a racket.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mercyblue

mercyblue

Posted
Posted
Please don't think I've been ignoring you, I did post replies but they've disappeared. The point is they didn't comply with the original 14 day requirement and it still wasn't chucked out on the day, so why would they fret over the originals request? it's a racket.

 

But there really wasn't "the day" it was adjourned at your request - the case has not yet been considered.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...