Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hollyblue v abbey


hollyblue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have just sent away the first letter asking for my statements to abbey!! (ahhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!) but I wondered after reading some of the other threads, if anyone has actually one against abbey? they seem to be the only bank willing to go to court, or am i just over reacting?

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

I have just recieved a letter from Abbey,after sending in my letter requesting the amount, saying how sorry they are to hear about my complaint against them! They say that they take if very seriously and will be looking in to it!

Also recieved letter from Barclaycard after sending in initial letter requesting statements way back in December, and they say they have so many claims that it will take them some time to get back to me.

Are these replies normal? :confused:

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hollyblue.

 

Standard response designed to delay you.

Just stick to your own timetable... you're in the driving seat.

 

Regards, Rooster.

  • Confused 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone on the site works really hard to manage things for the users.......looks like you are doing something wrong ??????

I hope before you lose this that you have chance to read it!!

By clicking on your user name you should be able to find all your posts....and threads.

I hope theres not as many as you seem to think.......they will need merging............Blue?????????:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh thanks, Im pooping myself now though!!

I sent the letter to them 2 weeks ago tomorrow, so I guess I should be sending the follow up if I don't hear anything this week?

Is that right?

My minds gone blank, will have to read up on procedure again :confused:

Thanks for support!!;)

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

I have just recieved gesture of goodwill sum of money, £820.00 into my bank account as well as a letter today from abbey. The letter has spooked me a bit because it says they have researched my account fully and that I knew about the charges when opening the account etc....

They also said they are not obliged to give a breakdown of charges, and to avoid anymore charges, to make sure I have enough money in account at all times.

Is this normal? and if so what do I do now?

:confused:

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

hollyblue, no need to feel spooked. They are trying to intimidate you but everyone gets that letter. Just press on. I can't work out from your posts whether you've sent the LBA or not, but if you got a GOGW you probably have. Assuming you want to press on, you need to a) reject the offer outright; or b) accept it in partial settlement. Quite frankly it doesn't make much difference which you do. Pinch the wording from someone else's thread - there are quite a lot !! In the same letter you need to remind them of the timetable you set for taking Court action (assuming it's in the future - if it's passed, don't mention it).

 

THEN, because you sound a bit unsure, I think you need to get your head round the basic argument, read through a thread of someone who won, get hold of the template Particulars Of Claim for your N1 Court Claim, and make sure you understand the logic. It's actually quite simple, but being the Law it's all long words, commas, bluster and huff. Put simply, the argument is :

  • a default charge has to be proportionate to the cost of the default
  • if it isn't, then it constitutes a penalty which is unenforceable (by virtue of Common Law like Dunlop and Statute like UTCCR)
  • Abbey says its default charges are proportionate but refuses to disclose its costs
  • You are therefore relying on : Australian survey, OFT credit card investigation, Treasury Select Committee, Competition Commission NI inquiry, BBC2 Money Programme all of which concluded that Banks default charges are significantly disproportionate and include costs unrelated to the default (not to mention profit !)
  • QED

Hope this helps. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help.

I sent away letter accepting the amount as partial payment but reminding them that I would be claiming the balance. I also reminded them of the time limit etc.

I just wonder if you can clarify for me,as I have read different things in some threads, it's about the amount to claim.

I only claimed charges relating to unpaid direct debits and charges for going over my overdraught. I can't understand whether I was meant to include the interest charged while overdrawn and I thought I was to add interest once it goes to court? can you make any sense of this / if so I'd really appreciate your advice!!:o

Thanks

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

hollyblue, you're correctly following the path to get 8% Statutory interest - you'll add it at the stage you file your N1. What I think is confusing you is that an increasing number of people are claiming "contractual interest" - that's just interest at rates specified in the Account terms&conditions (ie the contract with the Bank). This is usually included in the Prelim & LBA but you could, if you really want to, change to Contractual - it would just mean sending a 2nd LBA (just add another 14 days to the timeline).

 

What are you claiming ? From a GOGW of £820, I'm guessing >£5K. Contractual interest could add £1K to your claim. For example, the contractual interest to date on a £30 charge from Jun 00 would be about £55 (@ authorised overdraft rate). But have no qualms - assuming you were mostly in overdraft that is just interest they have levied on the penalty charge - so you'd want it back as well wouldn't you ?

 

Regards, Mad Nick

  • Haha 1

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mad Nick!

Thanks for that info, I think I'll stick to adding the interest when I file the N1 as you mentioned.

I just am not exactly sure how to do this, Im no good with spreadsheets:(

do I just work out 8% of the total, which by the way is £4248.00, and then add the figures together?

Never was good at anything to do with figures!! maybe that's why I am in this situation!!

I really appreciate you r help!

Thanks Holly

Ps, as I have sent letter accepting the GOGW, can I use that money, or do I have to hold on to it incase they request it back?

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

holly, Vampiress did a spreadsheet for 8% interest. You want the first one : England-Simple-Excel

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

You enter each charge and date it was taken and the sheet works out the interest on each charge at 8% per year and adds it all up.

 

As for the GOGW, you've accepted it in partial settlement so it's yours. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Im so confused!!!

been putting this off for so long because I don't understand the "court claim" part of claim.

It feels as if Im just making up some figure and sending letter into manopoly court!!

Can any one tell me what letters I have to use after having send the first 3 letters to Abbey, have a gwg of £845 and accepting is as part payment.

Last letter form Abbey said definately no to claim! end of story as far as they are concerned!!

I can't work the spreadsheet, I can't workout what letter to send, I also can't work out if I send a letter to Abbey and the court, just the court or just Abbey.

I'm in a panic!! (sure you worked that out thought)

All of the legal jargin in making me very nervous!

Can anyone help?

:confused:

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Niklowe

Holly, calm down!

 

Just have another read of these and it might become clearer.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

 

Above all don't panic there is plenty of help here.

 

Which spreadsheet are you using?

If you have sent SAR letter, prelim letter, LBA, and you have rejected the GOGW, then the next is to file at court. This is either By MCOL or N1 at your county court.

 

Don't worry with the legal jargon they use, that's just to get you to panic like you are doing now.

 

When you rejected the offer, did you use one of these letters

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

 

have a read of this. And relax!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nik!

I will check out the links and get back to you. Think its the thought of completing the spreadsheet and writing to the court that's the scaryist part.

Will let you know how I get on.

Thanks again. :)

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Holly,

 

I've just had a read of your earlier thread and it sounds like you were doing fine

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/45867-hollyblue-abbey.html

 

Pm one of the Mods to merge your threads and people will be able to understand where you're up to easier.

 

The spreadsheets are easy so long as you take your time and people on here will help you if you get stuck.

 

All you have to enter is the date of the charge, the amount of the charge and the description (returned cheque etc). The spreadsheet does everything else for you.:)

  • Haha 1

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Charley, not sure what you mean by, pm one of the Mods to merge thread? Can you help please?

 

What Charleyfarley is suggesting is you send a private message (pm) to the moderators of this site, and ask them to put all the topics you have started for Abbey into one, this makes it easier for you and everyone else reading it as when you for example ask a question the history on how far you are in the system is there also you stand more chance of people reading it as if they have already replied they will get an e-mail notification advisiing something new has been entered.

 

To pm a mod (for example karnevil) you click on their user name and then you will see on the right something that reads send private message and then you ask the question

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Im seriously considering backing out of the claim!

I can't get my head around the "Allocation questionnaire" small claims track.

I could work out how to get access on to the speadsheet you have, but did a basic one on microsoft.

Can't work out what letter should go with letter to court and which one should go to Abbey.

:(

I feel so...... thick!

;-) hollyblue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly don't condiser backing out there is people here that will help,

 

Secondly, it may be an idea to post below what you have done so far and what response you got from Abbey, sorry had a quick look above and found it a bit confusing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...