Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Surprise DEA


bluebear1872
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2987 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi im Looking for advice on a DEA I just noticed

 

Background in 2002 I took out 2 crisis loans from the social fund I'm 99% certain that they were both repaid in full

 

Forward to 2014 I receive a letter from DWP claiming I still owed them money I disputed this over the phone with them saying I had repaid in full they asked if I could prove it erm 14yrs after the effect no I couldn't I told them that I wouldn't be paying their spurious claim as they also couldn't prove I owed the money this was the last I heard from them or so I Houghton fast forward to tonight and I was heckling my Nov wage slip for something and I happened to notice something extra in the deductions colum DEA (dwp) £79.04 and an admin fee of £1 not knowing what it was I Google it to find out that they've deducted money from my account no letter of intent no contact whatsoever to say they were going to do this as I said earlier in 99% certain it was repaid as it was now 16 yrs ago my memory is a bit fuzzy on the matter my question is can they just take money from my account without informing me or even making contact to try to recover any alleged debt because I would have been asking them in writing for proof hat the debt actually existed

 

 

What options do I have open on this I know it's only £79 and to be honest I probably would never have had noticed if I hadn't gone to check something but it's just the underhand way it's been done that's angered me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this help:

The Limitation Act says that the limitation period for benefit overpayments and social fund loans is six years.

 

The cause of action (when the limitation period starts running) for benefit overpayments, is when a final decision is made on the overpayment. This is most likely to be a final decision by a council, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) or a tribunal.

 

For social fund loans, the cause of action is when the loan becomes due for repayment.

 

If the council or DWP tries to issue a county court claim against you for an overpayment of benefit, and you think it is statute-barred, you can put in a defence. This is complicated and you should get legal advice first. Contact CAB advice on your legal rights

 

However, if you are getting ongoing benefits, the DWP or council can take money directly from your benefit or wages to repay overpayments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took the advice from a factsheet at this link:

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/factsheets/Pages/25%20EW%20Time%20limits%20for%20recovering%20debts/Page-04.aspx#

 

As far as I understand it they are saying that:

 

"The Limitation Act says that the limitation period for benefit overpayments and social fund loans is six years."

 

After 6 years the DWP or Council need to issue a county court claim against you for an overpayment of benefit unless you are still in receipt of benefits, in which case they can deduct it from your benefits.

 

"In principle, a debt cannot be enforced after 6 years from the date upon which it became due. The 6 years runs from the 'Cause of Action' and the Terms and Conditions of the contract/agreement will have a bearing on this."

"Once a debt has lapsed, it cannot be revived - even through a subsequent acknowledgement or payment. The relevant law is contained within the Limitation Act 1980."

 

Bluebear says in his post that the first indication he noticed of the deduction was in his wage slip, not so much as a "by your leave" from DWP.

 

The question is, can DWP deduct money from the wages of someone who may or may not be on benefits just like that without informing that person?

 

The advice I quoted suggests that they can't. Perhaps you could provide Bluebear with a link to a law or advice that says they can.

 

Not sure where anyone suggested fraud might be involved.

 

The advice also suggests seeking legal advice. Perhaps CAB would be helpful, they may also have factsheets on the subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Waste of time DWP taking £316-00 from overpayment 22 years ago!!! They are taking it from my PIP. They cant even get figures correct as I am £22-00 short after their deductions, so have involved my local MP, even questioned Royal Mail as to how I never received letter that they were going to do this. Effing cheek. My God Duncan Smith is purging his guts on people, this could badly backfire as some people are resentful of certain people getting guaranteed accommodation due to a war crisis in middle east. As if the money owed is going to solve the nations debt, we are being sacrificed as pawns for those Bast*rd bankers who cocked things up in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure if DWP loans are statute barred see http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/money_problems/loans_debt_and_bankruptcy/whose_debt_is_it Statute barred just means they cannot take legal action against you to recover a debt through the courts the DWP have always been able to recover overpayments and loans when you claimed another benefit. Besides that the 2012 Welfare Reform Act and Social Security (Overpayment and Recovery) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/384) means that it can instruct employers to deduct money through a DEA they do not have to go through a court to do this and it is retrospective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did that with me, sent attachment of earnings, boss told them sorry we are a micro business, I don't have to pay a penny, letter came back, if you've taken money stop!!! He hadn't, then 4 weeks later same thing happened, boss called them and said your stupid, do you know what your doing - do one, letter came thru, don't take any money etc etc,

Edited by fkofilee
Removed Comment
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...