Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA query


KullyS
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3013 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am posting on behalf of my brother who has learning difficulties. He has been receiving ESA and DLA over the last 4 years. The benefit is automatically paid into his bank account.

My brother is 30 years old however his learning difficulty is such that his mental age is probably 7/8. He cannot read or write, or understand danger, signs etc. My parents or I do everything for him.

He does not manage his own bank accounts, we do this all for him.

His money has only even been used when I cannot afford to pay for anything for him, my mother always thought that because he does not work, he will need something when they cannot support him anymore, both my parents are at pension age.

I would ask for his money to be paid into a savings account. This has now built up to £25,000, bearing in mind that he does not have funds leaving his account and my parents and I pay for everything that he needs.

I also was not aware that you were not allowed to receive ESA once the savings reach £16000. This has been the case for the last three years.

I cannot continue to support him and neither can my parents as I now have my own dependents. He is currently sleeping in my 3 year old daughters room, or room sharing.

I understand that we will need to pay back the last three years of overpayment. What will happen to his ESA?

Can I spend the money on converting the loft area as his bedroom? He cannot bath or shave on his own and my father does this, can I spend some on a shower room?

 

We need to present our statements to the job centre next week. I am extremely stressed thinking about what may happen. I have personally never claimed benefits and I had no idea regarding the rules.

 

I understand that we should have spent his money on him and not used ours. I do not have any savings.

 

What are our options and what can happen? We do not have anything to hide and just made a mistake which he will be penalised for.

 

Would it be beneficial exhaling this to the job centre? Will they ask for the overpayment as one lump sum? Will my brother still receive his ESA once this has been resolved? That is my main worry, if he stops receiving his benefits, I cannot continue to support him. Paying back the overpayment will bring him back down to around £5000.

 

Any advice would be recommended?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no rule as such as to what you can spend your savings on; but you couldn't, for example, spend the money on an expensive holiday and then expect to get benefits. If this was me, I'd get it writing whether it was ok. You need to keep receipts for things like a shower room and other expensive things. (general day to day expenses such as clothes, food, etc, you don't need to keep receipts for)

 

His DLA won't be affected; as this is paid purely on care and /or mobility needs and has nothing to do with any capital he has.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply.

 

I think I will need to write a covering letter when handing in the statements explaining why it has reached the amount it has and why we are spending some of it on what is needed. I blame myself fo this mess, I genuinely thought I was doing the right thing.

 

Can they say because you have supported him, he does not need the DLA or ESA? I cannot continue to support him now that I have my own babies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply.

 

I think I will need to write a covering letter when handing in the statements explaining why it has reached the amount it has and why we are spending some of it on what is needed. I blame myself fo this mess, I genuinely thought I was doing the right thing.

 

Can they say because you have supported him, he does not need the DLA or ESA? I cannot continue to support him now that I have my own babies.

 

It sounds to me as if you've done your very best for your brother, he's lucky that you want to support him. I think you should continue to tell the truth. Hopefully before you deal with the DWP, other people who are more knowledgeable than me will have commented.

 

Nystagmite knows their stuff too. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they can't say that. He is paid ESA because he can't work. He (if he's on full income based ESA) will only not be paid any ESA if he either has a working partner or has savings over £16,000. The only criteria for DLA is that he must have care and /or mobility needs for 3 months and expects them to last for another 6. The idea of DLA is to pay for the extra costs he has as a disabled person. You're not expected to keep him for free.

 

His NI contributions (for his pension) will be paid if he has savings over £16,000 and he receives no ESA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I cannot wait until it's all sorted.

 

I will ring them tomorrow and ask them if I can take any of the money out for the bathroom updates etc, it just looks dodgy where there was no money spent and now I am using his money.

 

I can understand from their perspective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if there is an argument of taking any money from what I have spent over the last few years? Or will that be frowned upon?
no there is no rule against that you could even take some of his money and put it in your account for the ammount that you have supported him for if you worked it out on paper to show them

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

no there is no rule against that you could even take some of his money and put it in your account for the ammount that you have supported him for if you worked it out on paper to show them

 

But it would have to a reasonable amount. So, you couldn't just decide now that the DWP have flagged this, to take £20k, therefore, taking him below the threshold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...