Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest have just defaulted a Bank Account after years on no use by me - help


CapoFort
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3068 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

already got some help with a CCJ from you guys and was hoping for some advice for another issue,

yes I have god awful money management skills but learning slowly

 

in 2004 I had a current account with a overdraft facility with Natwest which I longer could make payments for.

So I stopped using it and opened a an account with another bank and forgot about it.

 

What the issue is that on my credit file with Equifax the debt is still listed.

 

The start date of the debt is listed as 2006.

It shows that until Jan 2014 I was up to date,

even though I have never made a payment,

and then in May 2014 a default notice was placed on the debt.

 

I have contacted Equifax to query the dispute.

 

I explained the start date is inaccurate.

the fact that until jan 2014 it shows as up to date is inaccurate

and because they showed it as up to date for so many years

they were able to put a default notice in 2014 on it.

For a debt that is statue barred.

 

Equifax will now query with Natwest but I want to know what happens if Natwest dont respond and what I can do to remove it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can place a notice of correction against the incorrect entry, and ultimately you can take legal action against them (the bank) for defamation, which the last time I heard stood at around four figures in compensation if proved the data is being reported incorrectly.

 

But the ICO would need to have a stab at it first before you considered any legal action.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres nowt to say they cant put a default on a debt over 6yrs old

esp a bank account.

 

 

this could be more difficult than it looks.

 

 

you certainly need to get an sar running to NatWest and get all the statements.

 

 

that way you'll have proof it was in the red for years...it was wasn't it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say the ICO needs to take a stab at it, what would that involve?

 

I read somewhere that it is not possible to default a debt that has passed the statue of limitation so thats why I thought you cant default a debt after 6 years.

 

It seems what they have done is state the debt was up to date for around 10 years even though I never paid a single penny towards the debt which is inaccurate information.

 

Spoke with Equifax to raise a dispute and they are contacting Natwest but they will probably ignore it.

 

if that happens then what would be the next steps?

 

Contacting ICO or sending the SAR template?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR Natwest

Complain to Natwest about incorrect data reporting

If no Joy report to ICO

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping I may have found a way out of this, fingers crossed though i maybe wrong

 

I contacted Natwest Recoveries dept. I told firstly I had no knowledge of this debt as it is extremely old

 

I then stated that Banks have a legal reuirement to privide accurate information, that stating I was up to date on my debt for 8 years every month contrives the Data Protection Act and also the ICO guideline of when a default can be placed which should be a maximum of 6 months of non payment

 

because according to experia stating the account is up to date means one of the following

 

  • Your account is in credit.
  • Your account is not overdrawn.
  • You are managing your account within the terms of your agreement.

none of which is true.

 

Not sure if the guy understood really what I meant but he tried to get into contact with their own credit reference agency to check, couldnt get through but he said he was going to send an email to that dept.

 

Told me to check my credit file on Tuesday and it should have been amended, or I have to call back to their recoveries to see what notes are placed.

 

So sounds good but will have to see

 

living abroad right now so sending SAR and letters not possible right now

Link to post
Share on other sites

ICO guideline of when a default can be placed which should be a maximum of 6 months of non payment

 

It ''used'' to be the case that defaults had to be marked in a timely manner, and in any case within six months from the default occurring, however I'm pretty sure that has gone out the window.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they should be reporting on your account accurately, however, all they have to do is correct their mistake and mark your files accordingly.

 

If you're saying that it wasn't in credit, overdrawn or managed within the T&C's of your agreement, then I don't see how that will help you?

 

I'd stay off the phone in future, the telephone jockey won't do anything they said they would, all they want to do is get you off the phone as soon as, and if that's telling you what you want to hear then that's what they do.

 

Keep everything in writing, unless you can record your calls?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date did you last actually service the account...IE make a deposit CapoFort ?

 

Some useful links.....

 

http://www.scoronline.co.uk/sites/default/files/high_level_prinicples_document_final.pdf

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/117/117-credit.html

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant was that NatWest stated wasn't in credit, overdrawn or managed within the T&C's of your agreement.

 

But it was overdrawn. I have not used that account since 2004 from what I can remember, then I opened a new account with Co-Op, ironaically for ethical reasons, and forgot about the NatWest one.

 

So to answer Boos question the last time I made a payment to that account ot used in any way must have been in 2004.

 

Normally I would stay off the phones but I am not in the UK at present so sending letters is not pss, normally I would record the conversation but forgot to start the program before I rang, stupid me I know wont make the mistake again

Link to post
Share on other sites

an account should be defaulted after 3 payments have been missed

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Actually I was completely wrong. The account I didnt use since 2004 was a Lloyds tsb account I used to have.

 

The total debt is £2584 though my overdraft was £2000 so assuming everything else is charges.

 

I contacted Natwest and was told the last debit from that account was march 2014. Which considering I have been banking with the Co-Op since March 2013 and have been out of the country since Jan 2014 I pointed out cant be possible.

 

they will be sending me the last 6 years of statements. I changed my address with them so they now know I live abroad which I hope makes it easier dealing with any issues with them.

 

Was also told the account is now being serviced by Apex Credit Management. but they have not sold the debt on, they are merely working as agents.

 

I have not been in contact with Apex yet, will wait until I have my statements so at the very least I might be able to have the deault pushed back and have the charges wiped out..

 

But in terms of dealing with Apex and trying to make a settlement offer is it slightly different because they have not bought the debt for peanuts?

 

Though to be clear at the moment it seems no one is chasing me for this debt.

 

It just I have a CCJ which will expire August 2020 and need to make sure I dont get another CCJ and being completely useless with money management dont know th ebest way to avoid that

 

thanks again for all the help so far, this seems the last hurdle I have before

Link to post
Share on other sites

" I have not been in contact with Apex yet, "

 

And I hope you never do contact them:oops:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I was living abroad they wouldn't even get a F&FS:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...