Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi first I am sorry aboute my badly English.

 

I just want to help me

 

. if somebody here receive soon a envelope from this RLP.

 

I want to know if have some stamp on the envelope and other people can understand want is this letter.

because I don't want my housemate know aboute this.

 

I am so shame.

I cant sleep

cant eat I am not going to work just stay and wait for a postman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

First of all, please try and not to stress over this.

 

RLP have been known to put their name within a franking mark on their envelopes but I haven't heard of any recently.

 

Before we go any further, can you give an outline of what happened. were the police involved?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

before a week I was in tkmaxx

 

because I have more items I put some in my bag blouse start to fall down

 

. I look around the shop and take some more things and go to pay

but I really forgot about this things in my bag

 

when I go to the exit one man come and took me to the security room.

 

They take everything out from my bag and I understand what's happening.

 

It is was more than50 pound and they call to police.

 

When they come just give me a penalty fare for90£

but the security man tell me that I will receive the letter from RLP.

 

I am really crazy.

I am never do all my friend know my like good person and now if they know!!!

 

if my landlord see this letter I will lose my room here

I am in biggg stores if somebody can show me the photo of this envelope I will so thankful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the image I have of an envelope.[ATTACH=CONFIG]59986[/ATTACH]

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

On to other matters. The police have dealt with you via the fixed penalty notice so their involvement is at an end.

 

RLP will send you letters (hopefully without the franking mark) and this will generally go on for quite some time.

 

The only people that can take COUNTY court action is TKMaxx and to be honest, I haven't heard a thing about any court cases.

 

County court cases are CIVIL matters not CRIMINAL therefore by ignoring RLP will do no harm to you whatsoever.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you sure I have to ignoring this letter

 

. I just want to made what I have to do I forgot aboute this things,

 

because is really stresfull for me.

 

I really hope my housemate don't see this franking mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RLP may not frank the envelope and even if they did, what do they think will be inside. For all they know you could be getting information on the company.

 

Please have a read of this thread I made

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?448994-RLP-FAQ-s.-What-do-they-mean-Reviewed-September-2015&p=4762870&viewfull=1#post4762870

 

To be clear, ONLY the store can take any action. Retail Loss Prevention will be acting for TKMaxx and as such can only state what 'MAY' happen, not what will. Their letters are designed to be scary but if you read them in their true context, they are not so much.

 

You are likely to receive anywhere between 4 and 6 letters from RLP with at least one informing you that taking advice from internet forums is not the way to be dealing with this.

 

Once RLP are finished their chase, they will employ a debt collector who has as much power over you as I do. (NONE)

 

All of these letters can be safely ignored. The only time to get concerned is if County Court Papers turn up but that is not going to happen as TKMaxx do not do court. In fact, NO store that uses RLP as their agent will go to court. The reason!

 

In 2012, a Retailer - v - a couple of teenage girls lost a high profile court case and since that time, no other court cases have occurred.

 

You did what you did, You have been punished by the police. Job done. RLP can get lost.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard that the first letter appears within the first two weeks but as they don't have that many staff, it could be longer if they have a lot of work to get through.

 

Incidentally, I did contact the Information Commissioner about the franking issue and they stated that it wasn't in breach of the Data Protection Act as it was the contents that mattered.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want them to send post to a different address, the best way is to write to them.

 

If you do write, you should state;

 

"I acknowledge no liability to you nor any company you claim to represent"

 

Get a free proof of posting from the post office.Agree with the phone call option. Record them and you don't need to tell them either.I feel you may be too late to do this now as your address is now in the system and it is already likely that a letter is already on its way. Any further letters would end up at the address you wish to them to contact you.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you stressed? Stop it. They cant touch you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally ignore rlp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...