Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Need to get your DQ in - it's your opportunity to have a say in what happens next! It should then transfer to local court, who will look at the DQs and determine next actions. Fairly self-explanatory and there are guidance notes on the site here. My Asset/Link/Kearns case was reviewed a couple of weeks ago after transferring to local court and they have been ordered to provide a new CPR-compliant Particulars of Claim, Original Agreement, Deed of Assignment and Notice of Assignment. They have six weeks to comply or it's struck out. As with your case they are relying on a generic print out of an agreement with no personal details or signature. Don't give the courts a chance to make any decisions without your input and get that N180/N181 in! Your call as to whether you want mediation - given the lack of evidence from them there is probably no point as you can't mediate an account that appears not to exist.
    • FYI I've had a copy from Kearns arrive today of the DQ from the claimant agreeing to referral to the Small Claims Mediation Service and without a hearing. I am a bit wary of the two replies above from you both. Which is the most relevant and most urgent to action? I'm away from Sunday the 19th to Wednesday 22nd working abroad and am conscious there's a bank holiday the day before the deadline so it doesn't give me much time to collate and post relevant paperwork either to you or the parties involved. Do I just fill in the N180 and post?  Apologies for my ignorance, It's out of my comfort zone! Also my case seems to be over the £10k barrier?  
    • Hello,  Me again, back with more questions from my friend because she doesn't want to deal with this part of her life.  She has managed to set up a repayment plan with 247money for the next 3 months.  We have looked at her car finance and she would have reached the 50% payment in Aug 2025  She has 2 questions.  When it comes to Aug 2025 what are her options for VT, I've read a few things and honestly the car sites all seem to give information in different wording so it's hard the grasp the core facts.  If she were to just stop paying the car now, obviously they would action repossession but what is the after math, money outstanding, impact on credit file, court action.  Thank you, 
    • Resolve call have one of my ancient, ancient debts that went statute barred in 2020, I've had a couple of door visits, first one just left a card, second one I spoke to, i told her how old the debt was and she rolled her eyes, and apologised pretty sincerely I thought. Not heard anything from them since.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st credit claimform - LLOyds card - Defended, DQ/Mediation help


69Eyes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2984 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Nice one, ta. So the date is set for the 15th, so I file mine on the 1st March. I should send by recorded delivery on the 29th Feb?

 

Can my witness statement just be that I've requested a CCA. Or do I have to go into all the gory details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice one, ta. So the date is set for the 15th, so I file mine on the 1st March. I should send by recorded delivery on the 29th Feb? Earlier the safer

 

Can my witness statement just be that I've requested a CCA. Or do I have to go into all the gory details?

 

See the following thread just covered this with another poster. (this is for an overdraft..but the layout is the same and same process)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?452903-Lowell-Carter-Claimform-old-lloyds-OD-poss-SB-d/page10

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Would anybody be willing to look over my witness statement and provide feedback?

 

I have taken inspiration from a lot of CAG posts, but I feel well out of my depth, and in my ignorance, I've tried to keep it short, simple and stick to verifyable facts.

 

Witness Statement

 

I Xxx Xxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as to my defence to the claim made by 1st Credit Ltd.

 

Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimants Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

It is admitted that I have in the past held an account with Lloyds Bank PLC in 2001.

 

I question the assertion that I entered into a legally binding agreement with regard to the issued card and do not remember signing any such agreement. I do not have in my possession any such agreement.

 

I have requested copies of the agreement on multiple occasions and have never been provided with a copy of said agreement. I sent all requests by recorded delivery and include documents confirming receipt (printed from the Royal Mail website) along with my defence.

 

Additionally, when first requesting a copy of the agreement in 2013, Lloyds Bank PLC responded by noting that the account number (as referred to by 1st Credit) was invalid. Documentary evidence of this is also included.

 

Therefore, the Claimant is put to strict proof that:

 

 

  1. Such an agreement existed, and
  2. That it was properly executed and has been enforceable at all times since its’ inception, and
  3. That the terms of the alleged agreement are enforceable within the terms of the act

 

Given that the Claimant issued a claim based on said agreement, one would assume that they would be more than happy to comply in order to prove that the claim is valid, eradicating any need to defend or proceed to trial.

 

If, which is not admitted, such an agreement exists, it would be a regulated agreement within the terms of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. My understanding is that under the CCA 1974 it is a legal requirement to provide a copy of the agreement, upon request, within 12 working days.

 

It is in my opinion that the claimants claim is fanciful contains no proof, and uncorroborated. Totally unaware of the details of debt they have purchased and expecting judgment/relief be granted, relying on the court to base its decision on assumption and basis of probabilities.

 

It is therefore submitted that the claimants be ordered by the court to quantify, verify, substantiate and disclose all evidence relied upon and, failing this, that the claim be struck out or otherwise dismissed as having no basis.

 

Alternatively if the court decides not to strike out the Claimant’s case, it is requested that the court orders full disclosure of the requested documents pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules.

 

The Defendant respectfully asks the permission of the court to amend this defence if or when the Claimant provides full disclosure of the requested documents and allows inspection of the original documents.

 

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.

 

Signed....

 

Dated.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alternatively if the court decides not to strike out the Claimant’s case, it is requested that the court orders full disclosure of the requested documents pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules.

 

Is this relevant seeing as I haven't requested a CPR (only a CCA)?

 

I admit that I did have an account with Lloyds Bank PLC in 2001 and that a credit card was physically issued.

 

Is this good to put in, or is the less said the better?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I first received notification of the hearing I submitted the defence as in post #1.

 

Their particulars on the claim form are:

 

The claimant claims the sum of xxxx for debt + interest. On xx/xx/xxxx the defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank plc for a credit card under reference xxxxxxxxxxxx. On xx/xx/xxxx defendant defaulted on the agreement with outstanding balance of xxx. On xx/xx/xx the debt of xxx was assigned to 1st Credit (Finance) Ltd. Notice of Assignment was sent to the defendant in accordance with s136 Law of Property Act 1925.

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

 

1. The sum of xxxx

2. Statutory interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of xx% per annum from xx/xx/xx to xx/xx/xx 91.40 and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.68 until judgment or sooner payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted the defence as in post #1
for ref
Defence in Response to Claim

I question the right of the claimant to collect the alleged amount.

 

On the advice of the CAB, in September 2012 I requested to be provided with a legally enforceable original signed Consumer Credit Agreement.

This request was sent to 2 parties:

·
Robinson Way (then dealing with this issue)

·
Lloyds

The letters were received (sent by recorded delivery and tracked), however I received no response from either party.

In November 2012 I wrote a further letter to both parties, restating my request and adding that unless I received a copy of this agreement I would enter into no further correspondence with them. I enclose a copy of this letter.

I am very unhappy about the continuous (frequently threatening) correspondence from
link3.gif
.

was a default notice required, did you get one. did you get the notice of assignment. some things to also mention.

imo. your wit statement, ie what you will say in court, needs revising a bit.

see what andy etc say

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if a DN was required. I don't have one in my files. But I've only been keeping files since about 2011, so I can't say for sure that I never received one.

 

I did receive a notice of assignment.

 

If you have any, it would be good to hear any thoughts as to how I could improve the statement. I need to post it tomorrow morning.

 

(I know I'm an idiot for leaving it last minute. I WAY underestimated the time it would take me to do it. Thought I would do it in an evening, but it took me almost a week.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you able to wait for andy, maybe tonight or tomorrow am. give him a pm nudge to look in.

'special delivery' before the post office closes shld get there the next day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tonight I can wait til whenever, tomorrow I have til about 11am... 1. I can't walk very easily, so I have to depend on others and 2. We're meant to be going away for a few days, so I got the help in early that day.

 

TL;DR Seriously bad timing on my part.

 

I'll keep checking in til then, with my fingers crossed. Otherwise I'll just have to bite the bullet and send it as is. If it wasn't for you folks it would be 100 x worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have amended one line in red...the lines in blue should be removed as they are irrelevant at this stage.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget to add the header (Claimant V Defendant claim number ....county court etc and date.)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

To my suprise, these guys (1st Cred) have actually come up with a genuine, valid CCA, signed by my good self. 5 days before the court hearing.

 

So I'm thinking to contact them and try to sort it out.

 

Does that mean I'll get a CCJ unless I stop it going to court? And is it too late for that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

upload it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be over the moon if they were not enforcable madgrin.gif but they do look genuine.

 

The copy of the "Application Form / Agreement" has my scrawl on it, and they enclose T&Cs along with it.

 

However... and I might be clutching at straws here....

 

The form and acompanying T&Cs appear to have been pulled from a microfiche or similar (with a blue tint around the edges.) This would suggest they were originals from 2001. Yet this cannot be so, as the T&Cs are headed with a very recent address (post 2010).

 

What is the best way of getting them to you once I've scanned them? A couple of them have private info on, which I have no problem showing you guys, but don't really want to post them on a public interwebs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they are NOT enforceable

the t&C's must be the originals'

from the time of uptake

not 9yrs later

 

 

follow the UPLOAD

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

incorrect address is important as regards non compliance with a s78 request

 

have a read of carey v hsbc

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...