Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • nothing, its not a letter of claim, which you of course have been reading up about in the last month during your SELF HELP using this site......and not just vanishing doing nothing....
    • Hello, Today I received an email with the Mediation Appointment Confirmation date. It is by telephone. This is set as a week Wednesday on the 19th June. It is likely I will be away working, but it doesn't seem they will take that as reason to reschedule the appointment.  How do I go from here? It seems to have arrived sooner than I expected! Am I prepared? Doesn't feel like it! What's my course of action please?  
    • The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] it should specify the period of parking. It doesn't . There may be times on the photos but they do not qualify as the photos are separate from the PCN. In any event between the times shown on the photos  and on the PCN [four minutes '] it is not long enough to have issued a PCN unless they have other photos showing your car was there for longer. Under S9 [2][f] it states   (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; They have missed out the words in brackets. Either of those two failures mean that the keeper cannot be held liable for the charge. Only the driver is liable.  As long as they do not know who was driving they will have great difficulty in winning should it ever get to court. Especially as the Courts do not assume that the keeper and the driver are the same person. You are right too about their signs being poor. First there is nothing at the entrance of the complex that it is private land with parking restrictions. {Well it didn't according to the pictures I saw taken in 2022 and that may have changed]. Second the font size is too small to comply with regulations. Because you cannot park there without a permit  the signs cannot offer a contract to you . You were therefore trespassing which only the land owner can pursue you for.      
    • Good Evening I received a "Final Notification Letter" today as attached. Please advise on what I should do next. ECP Final Notification Letter_22225201.pdf
    • This was on behalf of someone else and I haven't heard from them on the current status. They didn't know you had to pay for parking so unlikely there is a case. I've asked for the other side of the notice but they haven't provided it yet so there's nothing more I can do at the moment.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VAT on Bad Debts


Wheels60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3219 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A supplier has written off a number of invoices as Bad Debts, and reclaimed the VAT element. He has then issued a claim for payment in Court at a later date, and added interest at well above base rate. Is this permissible?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would it not be allowed ?

 

What element of their claim would be an issue ? If they have included VAT in the claim which you can prove they have already got back, speak to customs & excise about this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh AND, the VAT rate at the time the original invoices were raised was lower than it is now. Nevertheless, the original amount, + very punitive interest has been added together and VAT at the current (higher) rate, added to the lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are aware 'written off' is just an accounting term, to say that the debt is no longer on their main account, as they are unlikely to receive payment. Does not mean the debt disappears and it won't be subject to recovery action.

 

But if they have already recovered the VAT, they should not be including this at the new rate. If you are concerned, then alert customs & excise that this supplier appears to be trying to gain from an unpaid invoice by making a court claim including VAT at the new rate, when they have already reclaimed VAT at the previous rate.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Unclebulgaia67,

 

Your advice is very helpful.

 

It would seem that the debt is still recoverable, but that the supplier is NOT entitled to impose VAT at a higher rate than was in force when the original debt was incurred.

 

Am I right to assume therefore, that as the years pass and interest is applied, the amount of VAT charged MUST relate to the rate in force for VAT during the year when the added interest was applied? Rather than, as the supplier seems to have done, lump the whole lot together and then charge VAT at the new higher rate on the whole amount?

 

Is it therefore right to say that the newer demands for payment presented to Court are technically incorrect because of the newer and higher rate rate of VAT imposed on the whole amount?

 

I am not sure, but it appears that the supplier has taken the old debt (Including VAT) as a figure, called that the debt, then applied interest to the whole amount and charged VAT at the current rate on the whole lot. I will have to check the details but that appears to be the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their claim should relate to the invoice amount, plus they can seek to claim 8% interest and their costs for the claim.

 

If they have added the wrong VAT amount, then that is a mistake or they are looking to make a gain.

 

You could send the claimant a letter under part 18 asking for a breakdown of the claimed amount, with the VAT shown separately. If you search for part 18 of CPR, it is a way of asking questions about a claim being made.

 

Claiming the wrong amount by error would not invalidate their claim, if you were thinking a defence would remove their claim. But you can issue your defence probing the amount of claim and saying it does not appear to reflect the amount of an unpaid invoice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

See 1.6 from this link and it tells you how to set the letter out. I don't think there is a template as such

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part18/pd_part18

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this whuch should help

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?255329-CPR-part-18-vs-CPR-31.14-Confused-well-read-here

 

Part 18 is only to ask probing questions about the claim, not to ask for documents

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vat can be included in the claim even if the output tax has been reclaimed on the companies vat return. If they do recover the debt owed, they must repay the vat recovered to hmrc. The vat claimed must be at the rate the invoice was issued at.

 

If I remember the last rate change was 2011 17.5 to 20.

 

In addition of 8% they can apply the penalty under late payment of commercial debts act. Figure varies on value of invoices and can be applied to each invoice not just the total debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wold be nice if you followed this please

and posted the Q&A's here

 

 

then we might be able to assist better too...

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to all, it has helped a great deal.

I need to examine the details of the claim to see if I can take things further.

 

 

From what I am told the claimant has taken the full value of the invoice (including VAT), then applied interest to the whole amount.

 

 

I need to check if that is correct procedure.

 

I am very grateful to all that have contributed advice and apologise for not responding sooner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...