Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
    • I drove a friends a car for a few days and I used cuvva car insurance to insure myself for the time period. Here's the problem: I made a mistake with the dates on the insurance, I ended up driving uninsured for one day and I got a speeding ticket. My friend named me as the driver on the Notice of Intended Prosecution as she should and I will take the blame of course. Will met police ask for proof that I was in fact driving? I mean, any more other than me replying to the NIP that I will soon receive from them? Cause I assume that my insurance for the day will be the proof that they need... Secondly,  if caught driving uninsured, what will happen please? I read it's £300 and 6 points. Is that all or is it worse? I'm only asking for information from knowledgable people. If you intent to just mock, you're certainly not helping. Thanks
    • Hi, Please find letter sent to BMW with all evidence off issues which is a link from Audi. Unable to share the footage on this forum as I am not the best with tech BMW FAULTY CAR LETTER.docx
    • This is the first item that I've ever claimed for - I don't really send too many parcels, probably 5 in the last 5 years, and only two with P2G / EVRi. I've attached two emails from P2G regarding their requiring the documents. They don't specify in the emails what documents I should be sending, although when opening the claim they were requesting that I needed photographic proof of sending - picture of the parcel with their label attached, in the EVRi ParcelShop. The second email is their closing the enquiry due to my failure to produce said document(s). I haven't yet drafted my claim letter, I wanted to be sure of this document situation first before I began action. But therein lies another problem. Not having a P2G account, I cannot be sure of the item value that I declared. The retail value at the time was £600, which is less than the £650 I paid several months earlier, so I would likely have used that, but cannot be sure. And without having an account I can't check either. But, I know that I did properly declare the item and a value that reflected its then retail price - I was concerned this declaration may have been used to single the item for theft. But now that the retail price has reduced substantially, even though the nature of compensation is to return the claimant back to their original position, without my purchase receipt, I was concerned that I may have to claim for less. And yes, I've been through your huge document store of information, in addition to MoneySavingExpert, Which, Citizens Advice, Gov.uk "make a court claim", my own law books (annoyingly I specialised in consumer law when I studied for my law degree, but I graduated 17 years ago), and so now feel that its time to either act, or drop it. P2G Enquiry (2).pdf P2G Enquiry (1).pdf
    • I have found both forms online  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e14db38fa8f5649f912647/TE9.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c73ad0d3bf7f4bd6a9bc69/te7-dart-eng.pdf   do i just fill in both forms and send to the address on them or directly to Manchester council  forgive my ignorance    thanking you in advance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It should be mentioned that no one gets locked up for not being able to pay the bill, people get committed for willful none payment, this is why the various acts and CPR stress willfully disobeying an order of the court, contempt.

 

Also it should be said that courts do not coerce payment out of debtors. Taxes are lawfully due and most accept that we should pay them, in the same manner as we should pay for anything else. Some think that paying for something which is owed is coercion, it is not. The fact that they think this may give an indication of the kind of attitude they have towards paying there way in the world.

 

The court system provides a deterrent for those who do not abide by the law of the land.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

You implied that is what YOU can do you can not end of.. Or the Magistrates could revoke the entire debt or some of it did you put that down NO.. BYE

 

No, i forgot to add a link. As simple as that.

 

Yes, but the debtor MUST be in contact for the courts to entertain that idea. Should the OP not contact the LA/EA/MAGI then it could get a lot worse. There are lots of things the courts COULD do. I have given worst case advice and you guys are giving best case advice, which is good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why won't prison happen? What's your reasoning behind that statement? Is the op safe to ignore this matter then?

 

You need to read back through at what has been posted

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This goes to reinforce what has been said by most. Only 2 out of the 10 concerned Council Tax, one for neglecting to pay over a 5 year period, the other over a 3 year period; neither of these received custodial sentences, they were ordered to pay pay at the rates of £10 per week and £50 per week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read here eventually after 90 yes 90 attempts to try to get a debtor to pay they finally did send them down see here

 

 

http://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/Grimsby-woman-jailed-paying-council-tax/story-26339790-detail/story.html

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that some individuals have taken this section of MM post to prove what i said about individual debtors not being coerced to be incorrect, as usual they are wrong, the section says this" This is considered to be a coercive measure, designed to elicit the funds, rather than a punitive measure for not paying".

 

I understand this may be wasting my breath(see avatar).

 

But this section confirms what i was saying earlier about no one being punished or committed for being in debt, it says the sanction is not punitive it is coercive. It does not say that the debtor is coerced into payment, entirely different thing although I fully understand others inability to understand the difference.

 

It is all abut context, if anyone is really interested I will dig up the original post where this was mentioned and we can examine the word in more detail , since it seems to be so important apparently.

 

Sorry I hadn't addressed this earlier but TBH only just noticed the mindless abuse elsewhere.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following from the .gov site

 

 

If you still don’t pay

 

Your council can get your employer to pay your unpaid Council Tax directly from your wages.

Your council can also apply to take money from the following benefits:

  • Employment and Support Allowance
  • Income Support
  • Jobseeker’s Allowance
  • Pension Credit
  • Universal Credit

If this means you don’t have enough money to pay other bills, you can ask your council if you can make smaller payments. Your council doesn’t have to agree but will usually try to make an arrangement with you.

 

 

Not only do the Council try to help by taking the money from your benefits, if it leaves you SHORT they MAY even reduce that amount. So even when they are taking money direct from you they STILL CAN HELP.

 

 

How much more help can be offered before it is seen you are wilfully refusing to pay? After this then maybe a committal order is issued but again this can see the bench reducing the amount to pay. So in reality being sent to prison really is a LAST resort yes?

 

 

Top quote from here https://www.gov.uk/council-tax-arrears

 

 

Not only that spending time in Jail means it was for nothing the amount due is still due and collectable I believe see here

http://www.burnley.gov.uk/business/business-rates/business-rate-arrears/committal-prison-non-payment-business-rates

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes all good reasons for the debt to be addressed at a far earlier stage

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...