Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Blame Apple for completely changing how macOS apps needed to be written and verified overnight with Catalina.
    • Oh yeah... So there is. ..    Hopefully it won't try to upgrade 😂😂
    • There's the ability to download origin for macOS Mojave and older right on the EA Website. www.ea.com/origin-for-mac      
    • Hello All, I was hoping for some help with a  Claim Form received yesterday 15h May 2024.  I have read lots of threads but I just want to check what I am doing. I have acknowledged service noting my intention to defend all of the claim and I have left the contest jurisdiction un-checked. I will today/tomorrow issue a CCA request with a £1 postal order to the claimant and a CPR 31:14 to the solicitor.  For the CCA which section should I use? I am not sure which section Paypal Credit would come under. If the claim was issued on the 9th May am I correct with my defence filing date of the 11th June? Is there anything else I need to do? Thanks in advance   Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre, Northampton Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self (just 1) Date of issue –  9th May 2024 Defence filing date: Tuesday 11th June?? Particulars of Claim What is the claim for  The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69 What is the total value of the claim? £340.69 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Not applicable Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? PayPal credit account When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After April 2007  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, shows as defaulted.  Registered when it was bought by Lowell Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Cant find a letter that say so Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Not sure Why did you cease payments? Financial difficulties and mental health issues What was the date of your last payment? ? Mid 2019 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
    • In addition to the advice and questions asked by my site team colleague above, where did you get the template from which you used to reply to the letter of claim?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MKDP HSBC bank account CCJ - help needed set aside please?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3116 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone sorry to bother you all

 

I've been searching online and have come across this amazing site and fingers crossed

I'm hoping someone will be able to help and advise me on

 

how to proceed with a CCJ that I've just had put onto my credit file.

 

The debt is for £3300 and states the judgement date was 26th January 2015 but was only added to my credit file yesterday.

 

This debt is for a very old HSBC bank account debt that went into default on the 5th November 2009 for £3145

 

and now looks like MKDP LLP have purchased the debt

 

I've heard nothing from them at all and moved into my new house in july 2014.

so would not have received any court papers.

 

I'm just looking for some legal advice on what id need to do to get this sorted

it was due to come off in November this year so they got in before the 6 years and

 

i can't afford to have this on my file as I've been trying so hard to sort my life out and it seems everything is now coming back to bite me

 

I have also noticed a new company have applied a default to my credit file called MYJAR for £692

it looks like its for a old payday loan from txt loan from 2012-2013 again in my old address

 

but i defaulted 2-3 years ago and its only just been put on my credit file

and the default date is missing is this allowed as its showing on my file

as if I've only just started missing payments ?

 

Any help would be amazing and id be very grateful

Edited by Andyorch
Paras added
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Did you inform HSBC of your change of address ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps

that's why MKDP got the CCJ then.

 

 

for the myjar debt start a new thread

 

 

in the payday loan forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello again

 

i have a set aside hearing set for Thursday 3rd September 2015 in my local court

 

today iv'e had a large letter that was sent special delivery delivered this morning with MKDP LLP witness statement and evidence etc

 

showing bank statements from HSBC

showing me last using the account 11/02/2009 but allowed the account to keep on running with no money coming in

and they defaulted and closed the account down 9 months later on 02/11/2009

allowing around £900 in charges and interest to be applied to the account even though i was in financial hardship

 

. I was not aware of this when i issued the set aside application because HSBC responded to my S.A.R request last month

and stated they had no information for me on the accounts.

 

Had i known about the charges i would have contested it on them grounds also

 

There is also a number of things they have listed in there statement that i don't agree with and could do with some help please if possible.

 

I have made a appointment with a local soliciter at 10am tomorrow for a 1 hour meeting they want £180 to look through my paperwork etc which i really dont have

 

so what do you guys think is it worth another £180 or just cut my losses and give up and set up a payment plan ?

 

Any help would be grateful

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick response ill sort out scanning it all now with regards to the solicitor im assuming so from what it shows online i had a 5 min chat on the phone and seemed very clued up

Edited by theoldrouge
removing link
Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need a sols cancel it

 

Waste of money

 

It might have been better to have sought our advise before actioning the set aside

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all might not be lost...

 

Follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No good jpg

Pop them all into a word doc

Then file

Save as PDF

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you could possibly take a look at everything for me id be extremely grateful on your thoughts

also with regards to charges etc

 

 

iv'e now noticed that HSBC were also charging me TEXT MESSAGE BANKING

at £2.99 & £2.50 each time from feb 09 to oct 09 so 8 months and

 

 

also applied a overdraft arrangement fee something i never would have asked for

as i was not using the account due to problems and that was another £25

 

 

from February 09 - nov 09 when the account was not being used due to financial problems

they applied £715.26 in charges and interest etc

surly thats wrong to keep it open for 9 months allowing that to happen ?

 

With regards to the witness statement from MKDP

- she writes 28.

draws to the courts attention that the application was made by the defendant 1 year, 4 months and 11 days after the judgment had been entered

and therefore the application has not be brought promptly

-

They got granted a default judgement against me in January 2015 - it was only 6 months to report it to the courts

- again a mistake on her part by saying it was 1 year 4 months and 11 days

 

Also section 6.

It states i was sent final demand letters by HSBC

- yet it clearly shows on them 2 letters they have provided that in fact were issued to a address that was not even linked to my HSBC account

i used to live at that address before i lived in the one they had my account registered to- its a joke and full of mistakes

 

section 23.

She states MKDP did everything possible to trace me once on the 17th October 2013 and again on christmas day 2013

very strange day to trace someone for money on Christmas day but i guess thats how MKDP like to operate lol

both traces showed negative results.

 

 

the claimant therefore had no reason to suspect the defendant was not residing at the address

and has made reasonable efforts to ascertain the address of the defendants current address ????

 

 

they're stating they tried twice - 12 weeks apart from each other and couldn't confirmed if i lived there or not

- thought what the hell ill send it there anyway.

 

 

Yet they waited well over a year before the took me to court because if they had done a trace before they took me to court

i was clearly listed on the voters roll at my new address and i would have responded

- i don't think they have made a reasonable effort to locate me.

 

 

Even though they did a AUDIT check on my credit report on the 16th December 2014 which has now vanished and they fully deny doing.

 

Also should the assignment from HSBC to MKDP not be on HSBC letter headed paper as it looks to me like MKDP have made it them selves ?

 

i'm sorry for the long response but if you can help in anyway id be such a happy man

 

 

 

The judgment was issued against me 7 months ago in January 2015 so why is she trying to make out its completely different ???

Edited by dtlewis2015
Link to post
Share on other sites

stuff all that for the minute

whats this cheque they are going on about that negates the SB date?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

it was at that point in my life i was struggling with my finances and used a company called cash generator

who gave me a cash loan using a number of cheques and my guarantee card

 

they were always rolled over every month until i couldn't afford to do it anymore

 

and it looks like cash generator cashed 3 cheques which all bounced

 

the cheques were never dated by me as they were left blank

 

it was cash generator who dated the cheques

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you give them those cheques roughly

me thinks they don't count.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you give them those cheques roughly

me thinks they don't count.

 

 

dx

 

Just had a look at the statements they have provided the last transaction before the cheques were cashed was the 11/02/2009 so which would still make it under 6 years old :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

what transaction type was it

 

 

you'd have to be clear from 10/12/08of transaction from/to/by you for it to be sb'd..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what transaction type was it

 

 

you'd have to be clear from 10/12/08of transaction from/to/by you for it to be sb'd..

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

Thanks for the info

 

 

well looks like iv'e well and truly wasted my time and money

 

 

iv'e lost fully on the SB'D

there are loads of transactions from December 08 to January 2009 i

.e wages paid in

debit card payments etc

so is that now the end of it no more options ? :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

now that the info is up and the story complete

for want of abetter word

 

 

i'll let those far most intelligent & legally minded

to indicate ways you might be able to mitigate your issues

 

 

I'm sure they will look in on this thread soon.

 

 

sit tight.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

now that the info is up and the story complete

for want of abetter word

 

 

i'll let those far most intelligent & legally minded

to indicate ways you might be able to mitigate your issues

 

 

I'm sure they will look in on this thread soon.

 

 

sit tight.

 

 

dx

 

Thank you for all your time and help its much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will take a look at your thread later this evening dtlewis2015

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay dtlewis......having digested the details of your thread...not all is lost just yet.

 

Their Witness Statement in opposition to your application is a very good to attempt to persuade the court that they know all there is to know about this debt...and basing their responses on the main thrust of your application claiming that debt was / is statute barred at the time the claim was issued...knowingly that it isn't and cant be the case because of the last transactions as per the last statement... IE December 08 to January 2009 as the claim was issued December 2014 .....so forget the Statute barred route...the cheque issued Feb 2015 is irrelevant.

 

So what else do we have....unfair charges ...errors in procedure....delay in defaulting......errors the way it was defaulted.Now you must submit a witness statement in response and this needs to be submitted not less than 7 days pre hearing (3rd Sept) so we only have 6 days left......don't concern yourself on that for now...wont be a problem.

 

As for the content of the WS well you need to divert the judge away from the SB argument and get him to concentrate on the procedural errors not only by the claimant but also by the Bank and show sufficient argument to deny their WS and show that you can offer a defence with reasonable justification as to why the claim should be set a side and that their are triable issues.

 

Wont be easy and could be quite a complex WS...but hey as you have paid the fee and the hearing is happening...may as well give it the best shot..there is nothing to lose.

 

I will take a look at this tomorrow for you...and it must be emailed to the court and claimant by Sunday ...no later.

 

I would suggest you now take a break as its Friday evening ( I note you have been here most of the day) and spend what time is left with your family and try to relax.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...