Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

parking eye appeal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3359 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The images are too small to read but I'm guessing they've rejected your appeal. Have they given you a POPLA number?

 

You will need to repost the images, I think the advice is to post as a pdf.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain....so I would send a similar letter to the one I sent to parking eye pointing out about the GPEOL....I Also have a receipt for purchase made while parked on the day I received the charge, is it useful to also include this do you think? Is there a time frame I have to adhere to for sending the appeal to POPLA?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did PE get you in the first place - overstay? What did you put in your appeal (not that they allow appeals, but for consistency as it will be sent to POPLA) - did you mention having shopped with proof as well as GPEOL?

 

Have you been back and checked that the signage is good enough? If not, you should check.

 

Also, if you read a few other PE threads you'll probably find at least the gist of a good POPLA appeal. If you want more help, draft something and post it up and I'm sure you'll get some suggestions.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have appealwed to PE so they shoyuld have provided you with a POPLA code

Your appeal to POPLA should be

1) you do not believe that a contract exists that allows PE to make claims or take legal action in their own name and you require sight of said contract if it does exist for consideration.

2) You do not believe that pE has planning permission for the signs at the site so no contract can be formed as a result of their illegal actions.

3) That in any case the parking of your vehicle has caused no loss (free car park) to PE even if there was a contract to breach so their claim is not a genuine schedule of loss nor a genuine pre-estimate of loss but an unenforceable penalty charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ericsbrother, thanks so much for your reply, I have been busy with work so had missed your reply. I am just in the process of submitting online to POPLA now, it has really helped knowing what to put in the appeal form. Do I need to also mention that I did shop there also? I didn't put this in the original appeal to PE?

I am amazed that the shops around this car park don't do anything about it...there is Matalan, sport direct, mothercare, home bargains and a costa coffee to name but a few. With the maximum time for parking being 2 hours there is no way you could browse all the shops and have coffee or lunch!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the driver identified in your initial appeal to PE?

 

If not then state that as RK you are not liable for the charge.

 

Then use ericsbrothers suggestions in post #9 and add a copy of the drivers receipt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...