Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a CCJ does not 'expire' thus does not need any application to a court to 'extend it'. if a CCJ has not been enforced within 6yrs, then it is very unlikely any court would grant such should the claimant return to court, of which the defendant would be advised -( unless they have moved and not informed the court & the claimant such) .  
    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Son picked up girlfriends discounted oyster by mistake


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3382 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My 19 year old son and his girlfriend accidently picked up eachothers oyster cards the other morning.

 

My son was checked by the bus inspector on his way to work and was shocked that he actually had his girlfriends discounted college oyster instead of his own.

 

 

The bus inspector obviously confiscated the oyster, took his and his girlfriends name and address and issued him with a one day travel card so he could still get to work and back.

 

My sons girlfriend got in touch with TFL to explain the situation again

and that it was a genuine mistake on their parts as they have the same wallet with their oysters in

 

 

yesterday my son received a letter in the post asking for proof of his travel (His oyster card number) but if he has a pay as you go, this wouldnt count!

 

He has a pay as you go oyster and has never registered it online so this will be of no use and to be honest, I dont see the relevance!

 

He was up all night worrying that he will be prosecuted through a silly mistake and has tried to call TFL on countless occasions

today during his breaks and lunchtime but to no avail as there is no answer from .......

 

He did speak to someone on a different number but they said his case number is not down for a penalty fine just a prosecution!

 

He works in banking and is extremely worried that he will end up with a criminal record and ruin his future.

 

 

He did email the investigator/prosecutor yesterday explaining the mistake

and that he is more than willing to pay a penalty fine but has heard nothing back as of yet.

 

Can anyone offer any advice please?

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

He has a pay as you go oyster and has never registered it online so this will be of no use and to be honest, I dont see the relevance!

 

I wonder if they asked this as a discounted card normally has a special wallet, as I understand it. What type of card does the GF have please, a student one?

 

We would usually suggest waiting for a letter from TfL, although I can see why your son is worried and trying to deal with this early. Often if people ring up, the papers can't be found because a case reference number hasn't been created. Once the letter arrives, you'll know what rule they think your son has broken and we can help you both to draft a reply. He will have to send this himself though.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Honeybee13,

 

He received a letter yesterday just asking for travel tickets for his oyster which you dont get anyway!

 

 

The letter does not state anything about a fine or prosecution but He was given a case ref today but the telephone number

that we have both been trying to call just goes straight to voicemail.

 

The person he spoke with today said that it is going to prosecution!

He is willing to pay a fine or penalty whatever but he cant get through to anyone.

 

 

He is really worried and so am I! He cant call anymore today as he is working.

I am working too but on reception so its a lot easier for me to contact them.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated, Hes not usually a fare evader. It was a genuine mistake.

 

It was a student 16+ Zip oyster but they both have the same wallets from IKEA so you can see the error in picking the wrong ones up.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I've edited some paragraphs into your posts to make them easier to read for the advisers here.

 

It's hard to know what to suggest he should do before TfL have written to say what they plan to do. Does he still have the pay as you go Oyster from the day this happened? Although they say it doesn't count, it would prove good faith.

 

The identical wallets thing is tricky, because we hear it all the time and I imagine the train companies do. I would suggest that one of them uses a different wallet, also that he registers his Oyster card online. I know it's too late this time, but at least it would avoid future problems.

 

I hope some of our forum members from the transport industry will be along later.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He will register his card online tonight and has changed the wallet that its in so that will help them in the future to identify their own oysters.He still has his own oyster (his girlfriend had his on that day while he had hers) Hers was confiscated and not returned as it ran out 2 days after it was taken anyway as she turned 18.I dont understand why they would ask for a paper ticket for his oyster but not a pay as you go oyster...I thought they were all pay as you go. I know mine is!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately there is little that your son can do except write in response to the letter that he has received.

 

He will need to give a full and truthful response, explaining exactly what happened, bearing in mind whatever he told the inspector when he was questioned will already be in the report with TfL. He should explain how the mistake came to be made and can provide the number from his own Oyster to support his response. That is on the back of the card and should be given in full.

 

If there was insufficient credit on his PAYG card at that time to cover the journey that he intended to make, this will not look good, but otherwise can help evidence his explanation.

 

Your son should do this himself. As he is over 18, unless you are a qualified lawyer and formally representing your son, the prosecutor's office should not respond to, nor discuss specifics with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem HB, hope it helps

 

 

To the OP, the thing I would have to add is that from TfL viewpoint, if he knew that he had got his girlfriend's Oyster and not his own, your son should not have used it, but should have bought a ticket.

 

It was OK for his girlfriend to use his unregistered PAYG Oyster because these can be shared

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice. This is what my son is planning to do anyway.

He did explain to the inspector that he had picked up the wrong card as he didn't even know himself until IT was scanned.

Hopefully someone at TFL will understand this was not intentional and a one off mistake and just accept a penalty fine.

He is worrying himself sick over this as he does not want a criminal record for such a silly error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The person he spoke with today said that it is going to prosecution!

 

 

So another accidental slip is being turned into a major criminal action.

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?440749-Passenger-Focus-quot-Dont-treat-us-like-criminals-quot-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just me or is their a problem with these cards. We have at least one case per week of using somebodys else card by mistake , dont you think haveing a photo of the user printed on the card would stop the problems before they started?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would solve the problem by having a photo on the oyster card but they both had their card in identical holders. That's where the mistake was made. He picked hers up instead of his own without checking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's not passed too much time you could get your son's oyster printout showing that it was used the same morning by his girlfriend.

So, while your son got a free bus ride, his girlfriend paid full price.

No loss to TfL really, but unfortunately the oyster was not registered at the time of the offence and could belong to anyone.

At TfL they can check the oyster history going back a couple of months, so if they want they could check that your son is usually a full paying customer.

As said by other caggers this "excuse" is widespread and it's very difficult for tfl to identify the very few real cases.

Gain same evidence as described and send it to TfL, maybe a good prosecutor will look at the case and realise that it's a genuine mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...