Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/? Claimform - Cahoot Flexiloan 'Santander' debt


scenic meg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a court summons from Hoist Portfolio 2 Ltd in respect of a Santander loan.

It says the debt has been legally assigned to Hoist Portfolio but I have never heard anything from them previously.

 

The debt is from 2008-10 or there abouts and I do owe this money to Santander.

 

 

Can someone else take me to court for it?

 

I thought it had to be Santander

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, if the account has been assigned (sold) to a 3rd party Debt Purchaser, they can then issue a claim in their name.

 

If you require our help, can you have a read of the link following and provide answers to the questions asked.. post them in this thread.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a court summons from Hoist Portfolio 2 Ltd in respect of a Santander loan. It says the debt has been legally assigned to Hoist Portfolio but I have never heard anything from them previously.

 

The debt is from 2008-10 or there abouts and I do owe this money to Santander. Can someone else take me to court for it?

I thought it had to be Santander

 

 

Hi

 

Yes, someone else can take you to court if they have legal assignment from Santander (e.g they bought the debt from Santander)

 

 

However, there are a number of issues :

 

 

Have you been served with a default notice from either Santander or the debt purchaser?

 

Have you obtained or did you already have a copy of the loan agreement?

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

link in post 2 needs filling out and pasting back here please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Ltd

Date of issue – 4th February 2015

Date of def filing by --) - 4pm FRIDAY 6th MARCH

What is the claim for –

 

The claim is for the sum of £4300 in respect of monies owing pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) under account no xxxxxx xxxxxxxx.

 

The debt was legally assigned by Santander UK PLC to the claimant and notice has been served.

The defendand has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the defendandt purusant to section 87 (1) CCA.

The Claimant claims

1. The sum of £4300

2. Interest pursuant to s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 per cent from the 20/01/15 to the date hereof 13 days is the sum of £12.24

3. Daily interest at the rate of .94

4. Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? Just over £4500

Is the claim for a current account (overdrafticon) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account?

A loan account as far as I know, I did have a current account as well, but I wouldn't have owed this much on it.

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before, as far as I know.

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned

and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned - Claim issued by debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No, don't think so. As far as I knew this was still with Santander

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Probably

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not recently, poossibly earlier

Why did you cease payments? Ran into big debt problems and ignored everything.

What was the date of your last payment? I think 2009 or 2010

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

No, I may have iniially told them I was struggling, but as I say

I buried my head in the sand and ignored everything when it got on top of me.

Edited by scenic meg
I didnt finish off the claim particulars
Link to post
Share on other sites

go get your credit file

 

 

match the account number up to it

 

 

then tell us what the debt is please

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

NB: you got your def filing date wrong ..amended above

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX.

 

 

I'm using Noddle and it's listed under other accounts and it says account type bank.

 

 

It wasn't a current account though because that's on there as well and it was "only" £500.

That says account type current account.

 

 

Thats still with Santander according to the credit report.

I'm certain it was a loan and the claim refers to a CCA agreement so it must be a loan?

 

Ive also found out that the agreement started in 2005 and defaulted in October 2011.

 

 

It also says repayments monthly.

 

 

One other thing that concerns me is that it only shows D for the last 3 months,

yet my current account shows a complete history.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the one with 3 d's is that with satans bank too?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's crafty

destroy any evidence why don't you robbersway

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

have you filed your def

 

 

why agree an extension for them to magic paperwork up!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4pm FRIDAY 6th MARCH

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I had to go away on urgent personal business and have just got back this morning.

 

 

I haven't agreed to a 14 day extension,

 

 

the letter just said here is our agreement for a general extension of time.

 

 

Once they have provided the documents they will grant me a further 14 days to respond to the claim form as I see fit.

 

I've just realised that leaves it open ended.

 

 

I appreciate that I have missed the defence deadline (unavoidable) but if they've left it open ended then should I just file the defence anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone the court and ask if you can file late due to urgent pers issues

 

 

if so well get it done this afternoon.

 

 

so you have the agreement now via the CCA request?

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No agreement regarding CCA as yet,

 

 

they are well beyond their time to produce.

 

 

I have emailed the court and asked for a 14 day extension to file the defence,

which I think is more than reasonable

 

 

Got a hell of a lot going on in my personal life at the mo,

 

 

which should settle down in the next few days,

 

 

then I can concentrate in putting a defence together while my head is straight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you really should have rung the court on the 10th

we could have filed a simple holding defence that afternoon.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm simply not in the right place to deal with it this week, but yes I'm sure you're right. I will wait and see what happens next week, and then, hopefully with the help of yourself and others, build a suitable defence before next Friday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX, yes I'm sure you're right but my head is a mess this week. I will look at it again towards the end of next week and hopefully, with the help of yourself and this forum, put together a suitable defence.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are taking rather a gamble that your extension will be granted

you could find you'll get a default judgement by the time you respond.

you are well passed your filing date

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

but they'll get it by default because you failed to file a defence within 33 days of the claimform.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...