Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot/ Weightmanns - claimform old Vanquis card 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


spacedood
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3245 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

New posting here.

 

Firstly, I hope I'm in the right place for this and if not would someone please let me know?

 

I am discussing this on behalf of my wife who has today received a court summons for a debt accrued under Vanquis Bank, now owned by Cabot Financial and they are suing via Weightmanns LLP, Liverpool.

 

The total value of the debt (which includes their costs is just over £2900.00).

 

Now, I recall my wife having some difficulty with Vanquis re a charge they administered to the account and there was some fallout, I don't know the exact facts and she's in such a state I can't find out.

 

The long and short is, can anyone help / assist with this.... I know if there is a debt and it has been paid within 6 years then they have every right to go ahead and take you to court.

 

I suppose what I am asking is there any way that we can prove they have not followed procedures, I know that she hasn't received mail from Weightmanns but has from Cabot but filed it suitably!

 

If anyone can help we'd appreciate it.

 

Cheers,

 

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

doesn't matter really

can we get the facts established by filling out the link below

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

 

then get it ack'd [AOS on MCOL] defend all [whatever the background] then we can move fwd.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100UK.

 

 

I'm not exactly sure what you need me to do?

 

 

I've followed the link you posted,

 

 

where shall I put the details you need?

 

 

Please accept my apologies for probably being a little dim at this point! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

no bother

copy and paste it here with your results

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot

Date of issue – 13/01/15

What is the claim for

 

 

(1) The defendant entered into a credit agreement described by the original creditor as VANQUIS - CREDIT CARD

and having account number xxxxxxxxx ('the accoount')

 

(2) The claimant, a UK limited Company with company number 3757424,

is the assignee and legal owner of all rights previously enjoyed by the original creditor in respect of the Account.

 

(3) The defendant is indebted to the Claimant in respect of the account in the sum of £2733.xx

 

(4) The claimant claims the said sum of £2733.xx, plus costs

 

What is the value of the claim? £2918.xx

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? CREDIT CARD

 

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. It is the debt purchaser, Cabot Financial

Were you aware the account had been assigned

– did you receive a Notice of Assignment? -???

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - This I am checking but I suspect so, yes.

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No, definitely not.

Why did you cease payments? - I understand there was a challenge over a late payment whereby the creditor failed to cash a cheque for almost 2 weeks.

What was the date of your last payment?

- We are not sure and trying to find this out via credit ref agency if it will tell us, bank statements might be able to tell us.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

- Yes, their failure to cash a payment cheque on time for two weeks, they then claimed they did not receive it in time!

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? No

Thank you dx for your kind help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you get a letter from cabot stating they had purchased the debt from vanquih

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have checked with my wife and

 

she is telling me she did not receive any such letter stating the debt had been purchased / transferred from Vanquish.

 

In fact, she barely recalls getting any default notice,

 

I know this might be a little strange but considering she is super organised

 

I doubt she is wrong.

 

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you ack'd the claim defend all yet

 

worry about the history once you have that done

 

and the CCA request to cabot & the CPR 31:14 to weights

 

has she moved since taking the card out?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We haven't as yet done anything with the documents.

 

We wanted to get some advice first before we do.

 

Should we defend all then?

 

No she hasn't moved.

 

We've been here since June 2010 and the card was taken out at this address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok get the ack done defend all

leave juris unticked

 

use MCOL website listed on the claimform

 

you must defend all

regardless to even if you admit the debt

else by default you'll get a CCJ whatever you do.

 

get the CCA and CPR off too

 

time is ticking

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. First thing in the morning we'll get this done.

 

Are there any specific things we need to ask for from the claimant & solicitors?

 

Are there templates to use, I've googled but there are so many different docs and I don't want to send the wrong ones!!

 

Thanks again,

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request

 

 

CPR 31:14

is in the legal section of the green library tab top left

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request

 

 

CPR 31:14

is in the legal section of the green library tab top left

 

 

dx

 

ACK done online as you've suggested. Defend all.

 

CCA Letter (edited as suggested) and CPR Letter done - both being sent signed for....

 

What is likely to be the next stage in your opinion? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

gather as much info a you can.

have you got her credit file?

is it showing?

defaulted date?

last payment?

 

why did vanquis sell such a large debt and not do court themselves?

 

if shes keeps things..any statements?

 

is there ROP or penalties?

 

as this is post Apr 2007

they don't have to produce a signed agreement

prob does online too?

this could get sticky

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Defaulted date on her credit file shows as May 14.... Last payment we can't tell but maybe around Dec 13 Jan 14.

 

It is post 2007

 

We have no idea why Vanquis sold the debt.

 

I don't know what ROP is but they have almost certainly added their own charges.

 

Yes, I am sure it was taken out online.

 

Oh, statements were online, no paper statements.

 

What do you mean by "sticky".....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ROP is their EQiv of PPI.

 

 

as this is post Apr 2007

they will be allowed to use a reconstructed agreement to satify the CCA request

plus its an online one

so's it will prob exist and the sig will be a tickbox only.

 

 

+£2500 is one hell of a sum

PPI/Penalties wont touch that figure much for a card of this age

 

 

so bearing in mind all of those things

its going to make it sticky to buff this away.

 

 

tell us a bit more detail about the history of the debt.

 

 

you mention there were issues about charges etc?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original debt was for £2734.xx

 

I understand the issue with regards to the charges was due to the fact that Vanquis provided a 1 month off holiday which my wife called and asked to take advantage of over the Christmas period of 2013.

 

I don't have the full information and as much as I am trying to extract it without her getting ridiculously upset I am slowly gathering it.

 

Vanquis apparently did not provide the payment holiday so when my wife did not pay that month (we think it relates to December 13 as it sticks in both our minds now we've thought about it) they then issued a charge to the account, my wife can't remember how much it was.

 

The charge was disputed by telephone (I know, first mistake my wife made) and then later followed up by 2 letters sent to Vanquis. One asking for the charge to be removed and explaining why and the second advising them that they failed to acknowledge or deal with the first and subsequently as far as my wife was concerned until they did acknowledge it the account was in dispute.

 

Payments were still made for another 2 months as my wife recalls and then because she got nowhere with them she stopped paying, I think she told them why at the time.

 

It all got out of hand simply because they did not acknowledge her letter of complaint re the initial charge or even the second letter that was sent to dispute the amount and put the account in dispute!

 

Unfortunately, the letters were both sent via normal mail, first or second class and not signed for so we have no proof of delivery but only that the letters were sent and there was communication over the phone.

 

I know she received calls, they got to be a joke until I not so politely told them where to go and changed her number. Hopefully they won't have that call recorded!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well all that I don't think will really matter then

ideally regardless to any dispute

the normal monthly bal required should have been paid. opps.

 

phonecalls don't count so no worries about those

 

its interesting your wife keeps things

and has not had a notice of default or a termination notice from vanquis

nor a notice of assignment from either vanquis or cabot

 

there could be light in those admissions in your favour

 

nothing to be upset about tell her.

 

prob wont even need to go near the court at all

 

its not a court anyhow

so's I'm not sure why shes upset

 

totally no need at all.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, very kind.

 

It's shock factor more than anything else - also, I'm not the most PC of people when asking questions!

 

To be fair, she keeps almost everything that has any remote sign of importance.

E.g. - she does my books for me and is always on my back about being so disorganised

so at least it's not me you're helping lol!!

There wouldn't be any light.

 

I'm sure I would have known about her receiving a Default Notice, although,

I have no clue really what they are or what they look like.

 

 

I came across this forum while googling Cabot!!.....

Obviously quite a common occurance of one I am sure gets a lot of people panicking and upset.

 

I take it we just wait now until they come up with the goods?

I suppose if they sent those documents then they could potentially just make them up

as I don't believe the postal rule has any effect here such as requiring proof of delivery of those documents?

 

I'm probably just going totally off tac and in fairness, it's not wanting to get out of anything,

she wanted to admit liability (which may well still be the case later)

but it's a principle that they haven't acknowledged or dealt with her initial complaint/s!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they cant produce or prove the DH, TN or NOA were sent

they'll be hope.

 

 

but you must defend all, even if theres no hope as it seems at present.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a copy of the letter from Weightmans......

 

- Any thoughts on this please?

 

I'm not sure you'll be able to read that upload so I've typed it out;

 

Further to your correspondance of 17th Jan 15, the documents which you have requested at points two to three of the same were not referenced within the Claimants particulars of claim and as such cannot be requested pursuant to CPR 31.14.

 

In the event that you proceed to make an application under CPR31.14 for disclosure of these documents, we hereby put you on notice that we will oppose your application accordingly, placing this correspondence before the Court, and seek out costs of opposing your application from yourself directly.

 

Whilst we have requested copies of your credit agreement, together with the statement of account (I requested this as we intend to defend against the costs if we need to), default notice, termination notice and notice of assignment from the original creditor, it may take a period of time to obtain these documents.

 

 

Once we are in receipt of these documents however, these will be forwarded to you without delay. Please note that once directions have been provided by the court to take the matter to trial, a deadline will then be provided for both parties to disclose all documents on which they will seek to rely on at trial. You will therefore be in receipt of these documents prior to any subsequent trial in any event.

 

In accordance with CPR15.2, you must file a defence to proceedings by the deadline stipulated by the Court if you wish to defend this claim. In the event that you fail to do so, our client could then request a default judgement be entered against you pursuant to CPR 15.3 and CPR 12.3.

 

Please note that in the event that you fail to file a defence by the aforementioned date, resulting in our client obtaining a judgement against you which you later seek to have set aside, we will draw the contents of this correspondence to the Courts attention in opposition of your application to have judgement set aside and on the issue of costs.

 

We trust the above clarifies our clients position but should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Commercial Recoveries Team.

 

Yours.........

 

Oh and at the top of the letter it says their client is Marlin Financial (never heard of them) and the legal owner is Cabot.

 

The documents we requested were to be provided within 7 days. It seems they are stating it could take "some time",

 

can they drag this out or can we put pressure on as it seems reasonable that 7 days is enough time for them to provide the requested documents?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a copy of the letter from Weightmans......[ATTACH=CONFIG]55566[/ATTACH] - Any thoughts on this please?

 

Uploads Need to be in PDF format

 

Oh and at the top of the letter it says their client is Marlin Financial (never heard of them) and the legal owner is Cabot.

 

One and the same

 

The documents we requested were to be provided within 7 days. It seems they are stating it could take "some time", can they drag this out or can we put pressure on as it seems reasonable that 7 days is enough time for them to provide the requested documents?

 

Its only a civil guideline...but they are not at liberty to disclose anything until after you submit a defence.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...