Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guarantor and possible court action...help needed.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3119 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

simple, just respond by saying you do not agree to any of it!

then see if he starts a court action, which you can defend, and let a judge decide whats fair.

contact shelter or look through their website for info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

DEMAND a copy of your signed agreement before discussing anything further with him, if he can't provide it, if I were in your position I would let him take it to court.

 

He would have to prove his claim to the judge and if he can't produce the agreement then how can he prove his claim?

 

Was an inspection done when your daughter moved in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still very quiet.

I messaged him refusing to pay and asking for him to allow two local Councillors access to the property prior to a meeting with Council Officers later.

Needless to say he has not responded.

 

Also posted on Facebook requesting anyone with dealings to get in touch.

Very good response and lots of horror stories to add ammunition.

More Councillors getting involved and the prospective MP for the town has also taken it up for one of the group.

 

Not out of the woods but the noose around his neck is tightening slowly I hope.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update.....

LL has replied asking me to arrange a date and time to discuss the matter and attempt to find a resolution.

Fairly positive as I believe he would have gone straight for the jugular if he thought he could win outright.

 

I have sent a reply to him, reiterating my stance and declining a meeting, preferring all contact to remain written for the avoidance of doubt.

 

As I know more I will update.

Thanks

BF

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strangely, I disagree in part. Refusal of T to meet with LL may be seen as unwillingness to negotiate. Any meeting, T should remain calm / non-confrontational and just set out his expectations for resolution. The meeting could be recorded. with other Party consent, or covertly, on mobile phone, as an aide memoire for T's subs email to LL, to summarise T's recollection/of what was discussed/agreed at meeting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another ex tenant I am in contact with is at the Court stage with him.

His Solicitor advised him to never speak with him personally or on the phone as he has a reputation for agreeing something then denying it and going to Court anyway.

He has already denied that we told him 3 times the heating was not working....why..???................because we did not do it in writing.

That's one reason I am unwilling to speak on a one to one basis, the other is that all my correspondence is being shared with my local Councillor who is assisting me so he also has an up to date record of what is happening.

I will negotiate via e mail as we then have a record of any agreements made.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree, not worth the hassle of a meeting, unless just to clear up some minor points.

You are so far apart that any meeting will not help.

Keep it to emails. ( no phone calls at all)

Just respond to his, be reactive only, let him make the running.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From experience i was recently at a tenant and landlord meeting and this was a arranged meeting where the landlord just denied being told about things that need doing and also that problems have been made worse by the tenant themselves. This started off very politely but the landlord resorted to shouting and threatning the tenant with eviction. Then when council has become involved the landlord is denying any sort of meeting has taken place and that this is the frst time he has been told of these problems.

Edited by letsmakeamark
spelling

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

From experience i was recently at a tenant and landlord meeting and this was a arranged meeting where the landlord just denied being told about things that need doing and also that problems have been made worse by the tenant themselves. This started off very politely but the landlord resorted to shouting and threatning the tenant with eviction. Then when council has become involved the landlord is denying any sort of meeting has taken place and that this is the frst time he has been told of these problems.

 

Sounds just like the one I'm dealing with.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest news.

Today I received the Court claim from the Landlord.

Issue Date 07.04.2015

Particulars of claim : Claim for damages and loss of rent while the property was under going repairs for which the defendant stood as guarantor.

 

That's exactly as typed on the claim form. Nothing else.

 

Also he has reduced the amount from£2744.71 to £2462.75 plus court fee.

 

He has twice declined to let anyone inspect the repairs claimed as I believe he has not done as claimed.

He has not replied to my request for a copy of the contract signed by me together with terms and conditions applicable at the time of signing

I honestly believe he has either not done the work or had the receipts knocked up himself.....one of his claims was for 2 smoke alarms for which he charged £50 on the demand. I contacted the fire brigade who actually fitted them for US, free of charge as there were no working ones in the house.

The local fire safety officer has contacted me to confirm this together with the dates they were fitted so thats one part of his claim shot down.

 

I need some help now to defend this please....I will be seeking advice from a solicitor next week but I reckon the cost will outweigh the benefit.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

You basically defend the claim and counter claim against the claimant. You do not really need to worry at the moment but will need to have all paperwork available 21 days b4 hearing to serve on all parties. You do not need a solicitor. As it is a small claim it will mainly be decided at a hearing. You will also need to fill a aq in once your defence has gone in where you detail what is going on. Also in the mean while keep correspondance going with the claimant.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were papers issued under SCC or full CC rules?

Once received, your only realistic chance of success is to challenge, pref at personal attended hearing. If SCC, then claimant. has no need to include Court fees as these are generally payable by loser, together with other limited legal costs

 

 

LL is under no obligation to repair, or provide invoices, only justify reasonable professional estimates for repair, allowing fpr FW&T.

Neither can youi require LL to provide you with copy of G agreement you signed, though Court may request LL copy if disputed.

According to earlier posts on this and related threads, you have sufficient detailed info to provide a concise. detailed rebuttal for most of the claim, but the fact remains you were prepared to remain Ts G until end of T.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mariner51.

 

Claim is issued by Northamptom via the County Court Business centre whatever that means.

Re being guarantor until tenancy ended....I wanted out but the small print said I remained after the AST was over.

Why can I not ask for Guarantor agreement since it is this he will be relying on. For all I know there may be illegal terms in there or unfair terms ( I know there are re his charges) If I stated I can recall signing some papers re identity but not an agreement then surely he would have to provide...silly I know but have seen this used quite often in nthe debt forums to obtain the required paperwork.

I also understand that under CPR I can request these documents and if he does not provide then the claim can be struck out.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

A guarantor remains liable until all monies are settled.

 

I see no reason either, why you cannot expect to see a copy of the tenancy agreement that you guaranteed and your guarantee agreement, which you should have been given at the start of the tenancy.

 

I signed as guarantee for my son when he was at uni and were given copies of all paperwork which confirmed all the guarantors for the shared house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Northampto Court suggests MCOL.

You were provided with G agreement to sign, this should have included copy of AST and prob advising you to seek legal advice before signing.

If documents had to be returned, you had opportunity to make your own copies. You appear to have good recollection of G Agreement small print. As for statement of rent account, this should be included in claimant's claim package. T can request rent statement from LL, not so sure about G's rights, though common sense would suggest a reasonable LL has nothing to hide from G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mariner51...thank you for your comments. I get the impression you are a landlord and somewhat unsympathetic.

 

 

Firstly, I did not get a copy of anything signed, the tenant did.

My recollection of the small print comes not from memory but the section he put on his letter which he states is from the agreement.

His claim is exactly as worded in my previous post with no breakdown as to how he reached these figures although they are lower than his original claim.

 

Have attached the section included in the demand letter.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should of been given or kept a copy of all documents you signed at the time!

for G form to be valid it must include either a copy of the original AST and terms or refer to it. ( so this is an important document )

Claimant should include a signed copy this as part of his claim.

Also, as there is no benefit to the G, this not a normal contract and therefore some judges require this to be signed by a witness,( notarised ) and sometimes also under seal, to be valid!

unfortunately this does depend on the judge.

going to court is the only way to get this settled ( that's what they are for ); Judge will be fair as to what claims are valid and seem reasonable, subject to above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can anybody please help me out on how the defence should be worded and what I need to put to request info.

As stated,the claim is less than the original written demand and has no breakdown whatsoever so how do I counter all these points previously mentioned.

The call to the solicitor advised me on individual rejection per demand but since they differ from the actual claim I am now confused. I didnt see him in person, just a phone call and I fear I didnt get everything across clearly.

He also said the costs were not worth engaging full legal representation but did advise a counterclaim as the charges he has made to the account are illegal.

The papers were dated 7/04 and I have completed the AOS online so time is now counting down.

Any help as to how to word this and request the information please.

 

Thanks.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can help with a defence, but there are a few things to clarify first.

 

What do you mean by 'the charges he had made to the account are illlegal'? What charges? What did the solicitor suggest you counterclaim for?

 

Do you know what the solicitor meant by 'individual rejection per demand'?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...