Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.   Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA WRAG lifeskills?


Lisbon67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3405 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My next appointment i have to complete a CV and email them it or fill in a form that will help create a draft for a cv. I'm wary of doing this as i don't want them to have my CV in their possession, they could end up sending it off to employers without my knowledge. So my plan is to complete my own CV and bring it in to show them without allowing them to keep a copy.

 

[...]they said i might have to do group sessions which i wouldn't be comfortable with, due to my health condition, hopefully i can't be mandated to do this.[...] So next time i will ask for a private room on a one to one basis.

 

A suggestion, if you have the equipment: Take a laptop/iPad in with the CV loaded - Show them the screen, and inform them that is all they will get to see.

 

Did have A4e "offer" to do a CV for me, but I told them in no uncertain terms, that based on what I had seen of their inability to string a coherent sentence together, coupled with their atrocious spelling, hell would freeze over before I would allow it. A quick look at a laptop screen was all they had out of me.

 

As for "group sessions", if you get mandated to attend one, you have the right to ask for a reconsideration of the activity on the grounds that it is unreasonable for you in light of health condition. From Chapter 3a:

48. Mandatory ESA and IS participants may request a reconsideration of any activity they

have been mandated to undertake. Where they do so you must look again at the

activity and take into account why the participant does not feel the activity is

appropriate, reconsider if the activity remains reasonable and appropriate in the

participant’s circumstances.

 

Also spotted this from the same document:

Re-arranging a mandatory activity

42. If prior to a participant undertaking a mandated activity, they contact you because they

are unable to undertake the activity, you may choose to re-arrange the activity and not

follow the compliance doubt process.

43. Re-arrange an activity does not contravene the good cause process undertaken by the

LM DM. This is because until the mandated activity date has occurred, no FTP has

occurred.

 

If an "adviser" tells you that they have to raise a benefit doubt for a Failure To Attend, they are lying - They have the option to rearrange without having to go through the process of raising a doubt.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I ended up caving into the pressure of giving them a copy of my CV, they bullied me into it 3 different members of staff gathered round telling me they will sanction me. I am withdrawing my consent for them sharing my data.

 

Bit disappointed with myself for allowing them the CV but i can still withdraw consent for them to share it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They said i was putting my advisers job at risk by not complying with giving them a copy of my cv

:lol:

 

Oh, if only that were true! We could all withold our CV's and smile as the WP advisers were booted out of their jobs. I did my 2 years of wasted time with Ingeus and it never fails to amaze me the utter crap the work programme people come out with and the way they assume we know nothing about the rules and will just blindly believe it all.

 

Start recording every meeting and let them trip themselves up. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

To withdraw my consent to the data sharing do i give them the letter at my next interview or send it in post to the DWP?

 

Bit confused as to how to send it i have a draft of what to write, wondering should i hand them it in person or is there an address to send it?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, as a subcontractor to the DWP, Lifeskills are only the "data processor" as far as the Data Protection Act is concerned. The DWP is the registered "data controller", so it would be them that you would need to send any letters to. However, they have a legal requirement to process your data in order to administer any benefit claims.

 

Handing a letter to Lifeskills advisers would cause them confusion, and may limit what they do with your personal data. It is worth a try, but do not expect much from the exercise. (sorry if it is not the answer you were looking for).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think lifeskills are a subsidiary of working links, they're the ones I went to whilst on the work programme. Useless bunch.

 

I refused to sign their letters and had a big argument about it with the manager, basically these letters you may have signed allow them to harass any future employer you may have for confirmation of your employment (lifeskills and working links need this or they don't get paid from the government) even if they were zero help in finding you employment and you did it 100% off your own steam. I remember the numbers being something like them getting £400 just for taking you on, and if they can confirm you get a job (by hassling your employer or you as mentioned above) they get between £3k and £13k, more money for the more difficult a person, sex offender, ex prisoner etc. Dont quote me on those numbers though.

 

Pretty sure you can withdraw this consent by handing them a letter stating they no longer have permission to share your data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember the numbers being something like them getting £400 just for taking you on, and if they can confirm you get a job (by hassling your employer or you as mentioned above) they get between £3k and £13k, more money for the more difficult a person

 

See table 3: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmworpen/162/16208.htm

 

It should be pointed out that the attachment fees were due to be reduced to zero over the first three years of the programme. The idea being that as the outcome & sustainment payments kicked in, there would be no disruption in the provider's revenue stream.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if this helps but I had what seems like the same sort of treatment from my employment advisor. I told her quite blankly at the time that I was actually taking part in work related activity and as I was undertaking a part time degree and searching for work myself I would not have to as is specified by her as I was doing it with higher standards than Ingeus. As there is no definition as to what is not work related activity and also due to cases previously within parliament I had good cause and would prove this. She went on to say that there would be no action plan completed and that I would have to sign the form stating there was no action plan being taken and that I would not complete work related activity as stated by her as I was undertaking a degree. I gladly signed this and knowing that I can ask for a reconsideration of my action plan/work related activity now have to request a reconsideration of this. I know I have to do this as is stated by law, in writing and that it has to be taken into consideration, however I did state this point at a recent telephone interview and was advised by the adviser that I can not do this as there was no action plan to start with. Here is a copy of what was written earlier this morning if it is of any help to anyone and also any comments on how I stand would be greatly appreciated.

 

To whom it may concern,

 

In relation to The Employment and Support Allowance (Work-Related Activity) Regulations 2011 part 2, section 7 (1), (2) and (3), I would like to request a reconsideration of my Action Plan and the Work Related Activity I have to complete. I would like this new reconsidered Action Plan to include the completion of my Benefits Advice module and also the completion of the National Occupational Standards in First Line Employment Legal Advice Practice to have been completed, in the course of my Work Related Activity by the undertaking of a part time Degree course and completing a Certificate in Social Welfare Law, Policy and Advice Practice.

 

Because I have done this and also attended all telephone interviews and interviews in person (with the exception of when I have been unable due to disability) with (name of advisor) who is an employee of Ingeus, also because I have also searched and applied for positions of employment as can be shown by the enclosed copies of my e-mail address inbox, I would like it to be taken that I have completed work related activity as is required pursuant to Part 2, section 3, (2)(a) of those same regulations.

 

This request is made in consideration of all regulations and repeals to my knowledge via the Welfare Reform Act 2007, Welfare Reform Act 2009, The Employment and Support Allowance (Work-Related Activity) Regulations 2011 and Welfare Reform Act 2012.

 

I have enclosed copies of the repeals made by the Welfare Reform Act 2009 and Welfare Reform Act 2012, as well as a copy of The Employment and Support Allowance (Work-Related Activity) Regulations 2011 for your perusal to verify this. However due to the amount of paper required to make full copies of the appropriate Acts of Parliament as they have been priced in excess of Twenty Five Pound I feel it inappropriate to purchase these for your use.

 

I would also like to state that by asking for a reconsideration of an Action Plan that (advisors name) of Ingeus should in the course of her employment have prepared, that if this original Action Plan has not been created I am in effect asking for a consideration of a new Action Plan and for that Action Plan to include the relevant information with regards as to the work related activity I will have completed in relation to the completion of a Diploma in Social Welfare Law, Policy and Advice Practice over the preceding two years.

 

I would also like to request a decision of this new reconsidered action plan to be in writing, stating any reasons for the coming to the ultimate decision, so that this ultimate decision can be taken into consideration by a legal professional if the needs arise.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

John

 

Also she stated that as I have previously stated that I will show a law, that I have to show one with regards to good cause. I don't think she takes into consideration case law...

 

Here's a copy of that letter that will be getting delivered

 

To whom it may concern,

 

In relation to the incompletion of my work related activity as is specified by (advisors name) of Ingeus, I would like to claim that I have ‘good cause’ for this as I was at the time of the advice to complete work related activity actually taking part in work related activity via the undertaking of a part time Bachelor of Arts Degree and also the searching for and application for employment. This can be shown by the enclosed copies of my e-mail inbox which show application for employment and also the completion of the Certificate level of Social Welfare Law, Policy and Advice Practice Degree.

 

As “work-related activity”, in relation to a person, means activity which makes it more likely that the person will obtain or remain in work or be able to do so’ (p.1, s.13(7) Welfare Reform Act 2007)

 

I would like to declare and for it to be documented that I have ‘good cause’ for this incompletion of the advice provided by (advisers name) due to the fact that by the completion of the Certificate level of a Degree I have been taking part in work related activity which ‘makes it more likely that the person will obtain…..work or be able to do so’. (p.1, s.13(7) Welfare Reform Act 2007)

 

I have therefore been taking part in work related activity which I have been taking part in for at least two years previous to the advice by (advisors name) to undertake work related activity.

 

Also as ignorance can be shown as ‘good cause’ as is shown by Commissioner Hilary Magnus and that as is shown in paragraph 5 it was held that ‘in deciding whether there is good cause when ignorance has been put forward as the reason’…. ‘it IS necessary to consider whether there are any facts leading to a conclusion that the ignorance was reasonable’ (R(P) 1/79) (.rightsnet.org.uk) I wish to put forward that due to the fact that part 1, section 13(7) of the Welfare Reform Act 2007 does not specifically describe the work related activity, that I have undertaken and I am continuing with the undertaking of work related activity as I have been for the previous two years by the completion of a Bachelor of Arts Degree.

 

I would like to also specify that any ignorance of any further requirements to take part in work related interviews have been with ‘good cause’ due to the fact that as p.1, s.13(7) of the Welfare Reform Act 2007 does not specifically describe what would not be particular work related activity and paragraph 6 of (R(P) 1/79) states ‘that a mistaken belief reasonably held by the claimant was responsible for his failure’ (rightsnet.org..uk) the non-description of what is not ‘work related activity’ as is shown by the Welfare Reform Act 2007 is the reason and responsible for my ignorance to complete any further work related activity in excess of the completion of a degree and searching and applying for current market positions within the area of employment which are at least two areas of completing ‘work related activity’.

 

I also request a written explanation as to why any further decisions have been made in relation to your perspective on this

 

Hope this helps anyone

I am NOT a Lawyer, Solicitor or Barrister of any kind .... just like to read.

Edited by spooks77
Link to post
Share on other sites

My adviser also tried telling me that because the Welfare Reform Act 2012 had been passed that the Welfare Reform Act 2007 etc was not relevant ..... i had to point out that just because the 2012 act is in does not mean that the 2007 was repealed. I did tell her to start looking over the repeals and amendments though as I have had to. It's only taken me about 500 sheets of paper and 1000 pages to read since 12:30am until 7:30 am ... good luck on her starting

Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading the first letter to my employment adviser over the telephone she stated that she she doesn't know what I am talking about as I am completing work related activity and that everything is OK with regards to my Action Plan and the Work Related Activity I have undertaken. Guess hearing the specific paragraphs and sentences of various paragraphs of UK law scared them a bit.

Edited by spooks77
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have enclosed copies of the repeals made by the Welfare Reform Act 2009 and Welfare Reform Act 2012, as well as a copy of The Employment and Support Allowance (Work-Related Activity) Regulations 2011 for your perusal to verify this. However due to the amount of paper required to make full copies of the appropriate Acts of Parliament as they have been priced in excess of Twenty Five Pound I feel it inappropriate to purchase these for your use.

 

You don't need to enclose copies of any legislation. The government kindly publishes them, along with amendments and statutory instruments on the internet. Providing a URL should be sufficient, and if the recipient wishes for a hard copy, he/she can print it out.

 

Oh, and the average Work Programme "adviser" is ignorant in regards to the laws and guidance that governs their activities.... I had one telling me that I was "breaking the law" for recording our conversations. Don't think she appreciated me advising her to seek qualified legal advice :madgrin:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...