Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN at Local Hospital - Parking Eye


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3511 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

Can you advise please? I parked my car in a Hospital car park and didn't pay for parking which was a total misunderstanding on my part - you used to stop at the barrier collect a ticket and pay for parking inside the hospital, put the ticket into the exit barrier the barrier lifts - job done. On this occasion I drove up to the barrier which was already up the machine didn't offer a ticket, I guessed it was faulty so parked went into the hospital, returned after visiting and drove out as the exit barrier was also up.

I received a PCN from Parking Eye - wrote to them to explain the faulty barrier situation, they rejected my appeal I wrote to them again and they rejected it again. Now received a Court Summons for £145 - any ideas please?

I phoned Parking Eye, by the way, and they advised that the Parking Eye system had been installed a few months earlier but they hadn't removed the barriers which was why I never noticed the signs and had no reason to believe the system had changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any or all of the paperwork that you've received from ParkingLie to hand?

 

When they rejected your appeal, did they supply you with a POPLA code? That'll be a 10 digit code and should be somewhere on the appeal rejection letter? It's too late for an appeal to POPLA now, but we'd need to know whether or not they did supply you with one, as to not do so would be a breach of protocol, a breach of the BPA CoP for AOS members, and would render any court proceedings even more difficult for them to win (it'll be hard enough for them to win as it is (despite what they'd have everyone believe by looking at their website)).

 

As regards the court summons, when did you receive this as strict time constraints apply to your response.

 

 

 

For reference: If you don't know what most of the acronyms used mean, there is a handy guide in this post: Click Here

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - thanks for responding so quickly. I do have a POPLA reference and the reason I didn't appeal to POPLA was because in the Parking Eye letter states if I appeal to POPLA and I am unsuccessful then I would have to pay the full amount. I had been trying to contact Parking Eye (who are very difficult to make contact with) in order to check whether the barriers were faulty on the day in question. I eventually got to speak to someone as the hospital gave a direct number and Parking Eye advised the system had been installed a few months earlier and that signs are up. I certainly didn't notice them :(

I received the Court Papers on Saturday 25th October.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For future reference POPLA's decision is not binding on the appelant in any way, so you'd be under no obligation to pay anything even if you lost the appeal.

 

Irrelevant now though, first things first. Are the court papers genuine? They should have a court stamp and a case number on them. It's not unheard of for companies to send out fake forms or ones marked as "DRAFT" in order to scare people.

 

If they are genuine, you'll need to file an acknowledgement of service, indicating that you intend to defend the claim in full. This gives you extra time to compile and submit a defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, ParkingLie will tell you all sorts of things to try and pull the wool over your eyes and put you off using the system.

 

The truth of the matter is that a properly worded appeal to POPLA rarely fails, but that's by the by now as you're past that stage.

 

 

I must admit that I've not had, as yet, any experience of responding to court papers, as I can't get my pet parking company (not ParkingLie) to take me to court, and god knows I've tried my hardest biggrin.png but rest assured, someone will be along at some point that knows the ins and outs of the court system, and will advise you of the correct course of action to follow.

 

I do know that there's no great rush. You have 14 days to respond to say that you'll be defending in full, and then with a properly worded defence, there's a good chance that ParkingLie will drop the case rather than face a defeat in court.

 

Again, contrary to what ParkingLie would have us believe, the vast majority of the court cases that they've "won" have been by default or where the defence has been ill prepared.

 

 

Most of all though, to coin a phrase from Hitchhikers.... "DO NOT PANIC" thumbup.gif

  • Confused 1

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cardiff Devil and Dragonfly1967.

I'll dispute the claim - not sure what my defence will be though as I think on the face of it they have me. I'll probably take a trip up there and have a look at the barriers and notices, take same pics that sort of thing - just in case.

Any other advice would be greatly appreciated :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't have any kind of claim against you, they're just chancing their hand. Having written to them several times in appeals you will have inevitably identified yourself to them as the driver. This generally isn't advisable but what's done is done now, and it's not necessarily critical. These kinds of claims can be easily defended, but we'll get to that in good time.

 

What are the current parking conditions on the car park? If there's no entrance/exit barrier now is it pay and display or free up to a certain time limit etc? Also ideally we'd need to know what the initial ticket was for, e.g not buying a ticket / parking in an incorrect bay / overstaying etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If "they have you" at all, the maximum that they have you for is what it would have cost you to park there at that time, and for the duration that you parked. Plus perhaps the £2.50 fee that they've paid to the DVLA to obtain the keepers details (and even that's debatable) and not a penny more.

 

Your defence (and someone far better than I will be able to help you with this) will come down to what, if anything, ParkingLie have actually lost by your vehicle being parked on site. If you didn't pay for parking, that will be the price that you should have paid plus (arguably) the DVLA fee. Anything over and above that, ie the remainder of the cost (for the PCN) that they are attempting to charge you is a penalty, and they aren't allowed to charge you those.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I know too honest for my own good.

Particulars of Claim - Claim for monies outstanding from the defendant in relation to a Parking Charge (blah blah blah) ... parking on private land in breach of Parking Eye's T&C ...(blah blah blah ) captured entering and leaving with a valid paid parking ticket......

I feel such a crim!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the "offence" is that you didn't pay and display. As DF said the most this would have cost them would be the cost of the P&D ticket plus a few quid for their costs. £145 is clearly a penalty and any reasonable DJ would see right through that. Parking Eye have lost several cases in court on the genuine pre-estimate of loss (or GPEOL) defence. That's not the only defence you can use, of course. Parking Prankster's website has tons of good information specifically aimed at fighting Parking Eye in court. Have a look there.

 

They would only be able to claim reasonable costs if they win, and even then it would be at the judge's discretion. Also, legal fees in the small claims court are capped so as to make it fair for Joe Public to be able to take on massive companies like Microsoft or Apple without fear of getting slapped with a huge legal bill if they lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel such a crim!

I strongly suggest that you immediately pack a toothbrush and hand yourself in at your nearest prison so that you may be dealt with. tongue.png

 

 

However, on the other hand, you could choose to not kowtow to these bullies and instead fight them every step of the way. As I said, with a properly worded defence there's a high likelihood of you winning in court, and even if the worst happens and you lose, there's no CCJ unless you decide not to pay up.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about their solicitors costs and the court fee?

I bet they can still be awarded that - what do you think?

 

If (and it's a big IF) you lost, the very most that you'd have to pay would be £235. Possibly slightly lower depending on how they've worked out their figures.

 

If you lost, there'd be the original price of the PCN, plus £50 solicitors costs, plus £25 for filing the case with MCOL, and perhaps a £30(ish) listing fee. But that's the limit.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to respond to the claim by sending back the acknowledgement of service with the box ticked saying you intend to defend the claim in full.

Pos up the wording of their claim exactly as they have written it, their wording has varied over time so we need to know whether they mention commercial justification or PE V Beavis & Wardley case.

Also, get your employment contract out and see if there is anything in there that says you have to pay a third party (PE) to use the parking facilities. If not you can claim that you are the "occupier" of the land and thus claim supremacy of contract (your employment trumps their contract)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...