Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old BH Loan Sold to DLC/Hillies - help


scared34
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I would appreciate any advice on this.

 

 

We had a loan with black horse taken back in 2008,

due to financial difficulties we stopped paying our agreed monthly payment

and went for reduced payment plan initially with BlackHorse.

 

 

After about 12 months the debt has been assigned to Ascent whom we were paying the same amount agreed with BlackHorse.

 

 

Couple of weeks ago we have received letter from Hilsden Securities trading as DLC

informing us that BlackHorse has sold debt to them and they are now our data controller.

 

 

However the amount Hilsden claim we owe is incorrect.

How should we play this?

 

When account was still with Ascent we have made CCA request and SAR request to Blackhorse.

 

 

Sar is dated 17th of June with all payments that have been made up to that date.

We also can prove payments made after that date.

 

What should we do?

 

All help is greatly appreciated as always.:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You had an agreement with BH to pay a reduced amount, which they agreed to, did they tell you that they were 'selling' this to DLC?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and was the CCA compliant?

 

 

if BH sold the debt

 

 

you can be your bottom dollar

there are reclaimable insurances and PENALTY charges to reclaim I bet.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And whatever you were paying BH drop it right down to £1 a month or at the very least cut it by 50%.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

I would appreciate any advice on this.

 

 

We had a loan with black horse taken back in 2008,

due to financial difficulties we stopped paying our agreed monthly payment

and went for reduced payment plan initially with BlackHorse.

 

 

After about 12 months the debt has been assigned to Ascent whom we were paying the same amount agreed with BlackHorse.

 

 

Couple of weeks ago we have received letter from Hilsden Securities trading as DLC

informing us that BlackHorse has sold debt to them and they are now our data controller.

 

 

However the amount Hilsden claim we owe is incorrect.

How should we play this?

 

When account was still with Ascent we have made CCA request and SAR request to Blackhorse.

 

 

Sar is dated 17th of June with all payments that have been made up to that date.

We also can prove payments made after that date.

 

What should we do?

 

All help is greatly appreciated as always.:-D

 

You simply ask them to account for the discrepancy. Advise that you can prove all the payments made and would like an explanation as to why their figure differs.

 

They cannot charge you for debt collection.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Thank you all for advise. CCA they provided is complaint.

No insurances on loan. There was few charges fir the amount of £225 on it, letter to reclaim them have been sent(awaiting BH response).

I will sent letter today asking for discrepancy.

Best regards

Scared34

 

Another question guys,

 

If alleged sale of debt between Blackhorse and Hilsden Securities took place,when Hilsden will show on my credit file?

 

I checked my CRA file today and BlackHorse is still the owner of debt.

 

There is also no defoult entered against it.

 

It just simply sais 'late payment'

 

How can I find out if the has been trully sold?

 

Thank you all for advice

Scared34

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have received a letter entitled 'notice of assignment.'

 

 

if you have not

then they are only collecting

and can be ignored, keep paying as and to whom you have been.

 

 

 

 

what was the Org loan about please? and from when?

 

 

you say the CCA is complaint?

 

 

I cant see any other threads here with the info in ?

who decided it was complaint?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx,

 

Notice of assigment has been received. It states as follow:

 

' we are writting to advise you of an important change to the ownership and managment of your account.

As your current account remains in arreas we have pass your account and outstanding balance to Hilsden Securities trading as DLC.

You will receive a seperate letter from dlc confirming the transfer of ownership and responsibility.'

Letter from Hilsden received as well.

 

The loan was taken out back in 2011 for £9000 with annual i intrest rate of 16.70% per annum.

 

CCA we received is exactly the same as the one we still have at home.

You can clearly see amount of credit, total charge for credit, total amount payable,

amount of monthly repayments, ours signatures,

and terms and conditions at the time loan was taken.

 

 

Based on that we presume CCA us legit.

We want to pay it back, we just do not want to pay more that we owe.

 

 

Best regards

Scared34

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you reclaimed any insurances and charges at the interest rate they charged you? Something is fishy with the debt as it is rare for a creditor to simply sell such a large debt off when they could take you to court themselves.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you ever sent BH an SAR to get all the statements?

 

 

its rare for a debt to be sold without a good reason.

 

 

for a loan of £9k in 2011 this is rare

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

renegadeimp,

 

There was no insurance on loan. Few charges for £225- we started reclaiming process and used spredsheet from here.

 

have you ever sent BH an SAR to get all the statements?

 

 

its rare for a debt to be sold without a good reason.

 

 

for a loan of £9k in 2011 this is rare

 

 

dx

 

Dx,

 

Yes we have. Sar received whith all info and statements, we havent found anything suspicious in SAR. Altough what we should look for in SAR?

 

Scared34

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to SAR the OC. Something really isnt adding up here.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

And send a CCA request to DLC.

 

 

While they will probably come back with the same compliant agreement,

a properly formed CCA request includes the requirement for a Statement of Account.

This is the bit that you want because it is legally binding.

That should make them check properly and come back with the right amount.

 

If not, you have a clear dispute.

 

 

Send them a letter headed Account In Dispute and tell them you are paying nothing until they get it right.

 

 

You could tell them that you have proof of the amount - depends how brave you are

but I would consider not letting on what the amount is just yet.

If they can't get it right, they have no business asking you for payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello all,

 

I would like to ask advise on this matter please.

 

 

We have unsecured loan originally with Black Horse which has been sold to Hilsden Securities.

 

 

Notice of assignment received they have all paperwork and are on credit file as debt owner.

 

We have agreed on monthly repayment plan

 

 

when I looked on my account online they are adding something called Miscellaneous ledger postings every month.

 

 

It is about £80 every month!

 

 

Could anyone advice me what that stands for before I query it with them.

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new thread merged for history

 

no DCA has any legal remit to add anything

 

can we see this supposed compliant CCA please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

I will post it up tomorrow.

 

Hello all,

 

I am back again and again in need of your help regarding the same issue with Hilsden Securities applying intrest to my debt.

 

Paragraph about intrest from CCA agreement states as follow:

Intrest will be calculated at the intrest rate shown on page 1 on the daily balance outstanding on the Account

and debited to the Account on the last day of each calendar month.( after as well as before any judgment)

 

Can anyone share their wisdom whether they are allowed to apply intrest?

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

well we need to see the compliant CCA return

to see if you should even be payin this debt first

 

 

please post up your agreement

so we can help you.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pdf please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Morning all,

 

I have question regarding loan agreement for a personal loan we took in 2009.

 

 

debt originaly with BH has been sold to Hilsden last year.

 

 

In response to cca request they have provided agreement but my date of birth is wrong.

 

Does it mean agreement is void?

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you got the CCA pack back did it include all of the terms and conditions with it? As far as the DOB goes that is just a technical issue...

 

Can you please add some more history to your thread so we have a better idea of your issue. Then let us know if and when you made your last payment on this debt and do on..

 

Does this still show on your credit file. Has there been any fees added or reclaimed?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA is exactly the same as the one we still have at home from the time we took loan in 2009.

 

 

We were paying reduced amount for about 6 months from 2011,

BH passed debt to Ascent and then sold it to Hilsden.

 

 

We have agreed on monthly paymet plan and we are paying it off gradually.

All fees have been reclaimed back when debt belonged to BH.

 

We are in a dispute now over interest hilsden is still appying.

 

In my understanding debt buyers are not allowed to add intrrest unless there is special clause in agreement allowing them to do so.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged for history

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...