Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

claim form IND/Heggarty on old Lloyds (5 and a half years) credit card debt***Claim Dismissed***


Miscreant
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What if the date of assignment is actually more recent?

 

Does it still count as they are claiming for the dates specified?

 

It seems they've signed their own death warrant here.

 

I will submit this is the morning. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I doubt it is.....the interest date,s as already stated indicates the assignment date....that is why they left it off in the main particulars.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think some caution may be needed here.

 

Don't want to dispute the advice given by Andy, as he has by far the best legal knowledge on here and has helped me vastly in the past.

 

However I have been in the position of using this exact defence against IND and it's not as 100% as watertight as it appears.

 

Although in theory it should be, but IND are 100% game players of the court system and the masters of making "administrative" mistakes.

 

Quite often, the dates given on claim forms for interest, etc are quite often backdated to the point that they make a debt that isn't statue barred become statue barred.

 

Ok so first question:

Is that date they provided correct (or roughly correct) ?, if not do you believe you are still in the 6 years period ?

 

The reason is, IND do not make mistakes, they make DELIBERATE mistakes.

 

They will be prepared for this one, if you are still within in the 6 year period.

 

For Andy:

In my case, they suddenly produced some paperwork which showed the dispute was within the 6 years and they claimed a "typo", judge didn't allow that part of my defence to stand.

 

Fortunately I had a 2nd and 3rd line of defence that held up very well.

And the Statue barred error did prove of some use, because along with all the other "typos", and other mistakes the judge deemed any evidence from them as not being credible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I remember the account interest was frozen in 2008 and minimal payments made for a short period with Lloyds

 

My final correspondence with Lloyds was 5th May 2009 which was within the 6 year period.

 

I do not remember the date of the final payment.

 

The date does not appear correct to me and seems to have been plucked out of the air.

 

With this in mind should I now add lack of cca to the defence?

 

Anything else I can add to this?

 

This is definitely very close to the 6 year mark if not beyond it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" I disputed the claim back in 2009 and have not acknowledged it since then. If I respond to this letter then am I not acknowledging the account again?

 

If I ignore this then what is the worst that can happen? A CCJ?

 

Can I question the legitimacy of IND to even be acting in this way with no CCA or signed contract to be found anywhere?

 

As soon as we reach May 2015 this is 6 years old and null and void. is this just a last ditch effort to try and scare me into acknowledging this debt?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this mean that the statute barred defence will not work?

 

Feeling a little lost as what to do now.

 

And to top it off I am unable to log into the moneyclaim online.

 

I assume the user ID is my name or is it a number they gave me?

 

I assumed it would auto login next time I went on but that is not the case and their confirmation email does not give any details either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How was this dispute in 2009 worded? Did is unequivocally admit liability for the debt, e.g." this is my debt but I dispute the amount " or something similar?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So does this mean that the statute barred defence will not work?

 

Feeling a little lost as what to do now.

 

And to top it off I am unable to log into the moneyclaim online.

 

I assume the user ID is my name or is it a number they gave me? I assumed it would auto login next time I went on but that is not the case and their confirmation email does not give any details either.

 

Not a case of that it won't work, but you are potentially at the mercy of the judges lottery if they suddenly pull out the paperwork at a later stage showing it's within the 6 years.

 

Suddenly, the dates "3/1/08 to 5/9/14" becomes "3/1O/08 to 5/9/14" , as you say you are borderline with the 6 years, you couldn't get an closer!.

 

By all means, you still need it in your defence. Just because one part of your defence is ruled out, it doesn't mean the whole lot is.

 

You just need to have a 2nd and/or 3rd line of defence ready just in case.

 

At this late stage I don't want recommend anything, as I have not been keeping up to date with these issues. So will leave to others to recommend the best course of action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The latter started with an explanation of circumstances regarding my inability to make further payments and complaints about the amount of interest added since 2007 when I first wrote to them about the debt and the problem it was causing.

 

The letter ended with this:

 

Since the total figure was vastly inflated and I am unable to check any details regarding this on the internet banking it is hard for me so see what the figure of the alleged debt is and how much has already been paid in to it.

 

Therefore I am requesting that you send me a verification and validation of the debt, I understand that you are required to send this to me by law upon request and that all collections activity must cease until the requested information is provided- this specifically includes any and all phone calls to any number regarding this issue.

 

Upon receipt of the requested information I would be happy to consider arrangements to repay any money that I legally owe.

 

I look forward to your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until midnight tomorrow.

 

I can however ask for a 28 day extension due to my cca request.

 

I am currently unable to log in to government gateway or moneyclaim online as I do not have the ID or customer number. I have no emails from them detailing this.

 

I enrolled to acknowledge the claim and defend all. Now I want to be able to submit my defence but I am unable to get in! Also the help desk number given on the government site is out of service! Is this a deliberate joke?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok don't sweat, give others chance to get in from work and give their tuppence worth.

 

Having taken on these IND mob myself in the past and not only defeated their action, I actually walked away with compensation from them.

So I do know some weakness's and tactics that can be used against them.

 

So don't worry, I have a couple of things which you could use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having now re registered with government gateway I have found the original ID which I downloaded at the time.

 

It now claims that it cannot find the user when I ask for a password reminder to my email.

 

I also am unable to respond to the claim through a newly registered account as it says that the Claim number or password is incorrect.

 

It seems as if they do not want me to be able to get in to this online service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont concern yourself with logging in problems at this moment...you can use the defendants email option to submit your defence.

 

We need to establish what date you last made a payment ? Do you have a Default Notice ? Do you have Notices of sums in Arrears? Have you checked your CRAs files is it still showing?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You sign up to Noodle/Equifax and Experian

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

noddle below

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All I have is a savings account card which is not accepted by any of the 3 credit checks mentioned.

 

I can use a family member's card but then that will not be in my name.

 

A bit vexed by all this now...

 

Used another card for experian. They say they will email me and complete this over the next 2 days. I might have to apply to the court for the extension anyway in order to get all this clarified.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a facility for getting a "statutory" credit report for a fee of £2 by post.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I either contact Northampton Court tomorrow by telephone and inform them of the 28 day extension granted

and then apply for a statutory credit report to establish the exact details of the movements of the account.

 

Or I plough on with the "statute barred" defence backed up with the "no holding/paperwork" defence

and deny entering into any agreement with anyone

and hit them with that via email tomorrow,

within my original deadline?

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I remember the account interest was frozen in 2008 and minimal payments made for a short period with Lloyds. My final correspondence with Lloyds was 5th May 2009 which was within the 6 year period. I do not remember the date of the final payment. The date does not appear correct to me and seems to have been plucked out of the air.

 

So with this in mind should I now add lack of cca to the defence?

 

Anything else I can add to this?

 

This is definitely very close to the 6 year mark if not beyond it.

 

have you tried a call to loyds to see when yr last payment to them was, and when they sold it on? their records shld still show that info.

when in 2008 was interest frozen? loyds usually stop interest after a default. or was that re an arrangement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...