Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IB transfer to ESA result!!


*RainbowTears*
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning CAGgers,

 

I have as some may remember on here, started the transfer from IB to ESA approx a year or so ago.

 

Since sending the form ESA50 (I think!) in, I never heard anything at all. As I was aware from on here, that it could take months whilst I waited for the medical appt etc.

 

Well yesterday morning I got the brown envelope in the post. Finally me thinks!!

 

Surprise surprise, I've been put straight into the Support group without a medical!

 

Does this usually happen??

 

Now on the form it states what I'm entitled to & I now will actually receive more money than I did on IB. (Again lovely surprise).

 

So my question is, on the form there's no end date, it just states that I am entitled to ESA & how much I'll receive.

 

So how long do I get ESA for?

 

Or does it run like the IB did?

 

Thanks babes!!

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your ESA will remain in payment until you are assessed as being fit for work provided you meet any other conditons.

 

In theory at least reassessments should happen on a regular basis, the interval between them being entirely at DWP's discretion hence some people being reassessed after 3 months and others not at all. This latter is particularly true at the moment because of the backlog of assessments and may go some way to explaining why more people than usual are being put in a group without a face to face assessment.

 

As part of the assessment process, whether or not a face to face assessment is done, the ATOS healthcare professional will have made a recommendation as to when reassessment might be reasonable, and if you ask DWP for a copy of the report it will be on there. I can't remember the name of the form just now, it's a slightly different one for no face to face assessment, but if you ring DWP and ask for a copy of your ESA medical, I'm sure they'll know what you mean. Even if you're not particularly interested in how long you might expect to wait (and it is only advisory anyway) I would recommend getting a copy of the report for your own records and to assist in filling in your next ESA50.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the form RMW is talking about is an ESA85a?

 

I think you're right, thank you. Though I'll have forgotten again in about 10 minutes. I blame the medication.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks indeed RMW!

 

So am I right in thinking, that even though I did not have a medical or even spoken to anyone since sending in my ESA50, that whomever made the decision on my case has a report of their findings & it's this I need a copy off? (apologies if I've misunderstood but medications I'm on can & do affect my thinking)

 

Thank you Nystagmite!

 

Lol Dyfed, thank you, yes my migration has taken a long while as I had to wait until I received the ESA50. Which finally turned up a year ago!!

 

I've been on IB since the 90s so I've no idea if this had any affect on the time it's taken!!

 

I was totally shocked & pleasantly surprised to go straight into the Support group, with no medical or further input from myself other than my completed ESA50. (Which took me a couple weeks to fill in).

 

For which I'm thankful off, as I have read on quite a few threads on here about the Medicals!!

 

So I will do as RMW suggests & ask for a copy of ESA85a for my records. (as long as I can remember I do have it, lol, as I'm just as bad as RMW for remembering things)

 

Thanks again Ev1 indeed!!

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There still will be a report, yes. I didn't have a face to face and got into the support group too. I appealed DLA (ESA was awarded around the same time) and requested that DLA contact ESA just in case there was something that would be relevant to my case. I was then sent a bunch of papers which did include the report from ESA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on my report from atos the comment was that I am unlikely to improve long term, and I have ended up in support group without a face to face, and they gave a 2yr time on it.......I guess they cant just say long term or never re assessed etc. So we shall see what happens next time, the dwp told me that I will come up for re assessment in January 2016, by the current news that atos will be gone by then I can only wait to see what horror will replace them haha............well done though and enjoy the peace.

 

I was astounded that on my report as well as the name of the disability nurse who made the report, but also the name of the decision maker who put me in support group, I didn't ever get a decision makers name before ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks indeed to you both, Nystagmite & Ruby!

 

Ruby you say they gave you a 2 year time on your report, So this (a time frame) should also be on my report that I have to request?

 

See I never knew you could request their report until I was told about it on this thread.

 

I've read so many "horror stories" about medicals, where blatant lies have been told by the ATOS Drs/Nurses. Also about how so many people going through the IB to ESA transfer were scoring 0 points & loosing their benefits & having to appeal, which all takes many months & untolds of stress to get through.

 

I was literally dreading it, as I'd need a home visit & even for that request, you are put through the mill....

 

So I now count myself extremely fortunate indeed, well done to you both too!!

 

We will all have to wait & see what happens next once ATOS has gone, just hope whomever replaces them do a better job & make it less stressful for all those concerned!!

 

Thanks again to you all for your help!

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had two pages sent to me........one was the atos nurse's report stating I am ill likely in the long term. The other was the decision makers report, which says 2 yrs. From what I gather 2yrs is usual in a case like mine, its quite rare I think to get a longer time, because of the set up of re assessing etc. I am guessing it was the decision maker who gave the 2yr decision in the end. The nurse had said unlikely fit to work in the long term and not within 2 yrs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...