Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Last month was confirmed to be the hottest-ever May on record, in terms of global average temperatures, completing an entire calendar year of month-by-month records.  The average temperature last month was 1.52C above the pre-industrial average, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, known as C3S. The average global temperature for the 12-month period to the end of May was 1.63C (2.9F) above the pre-industrial average
    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability. Many thanks   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 17/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot, Mortimer Claimform - cat JD Williams TA Marisota 'debt'


ER36
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today I have received a claim form for a debt with Cabot for a catalogue debt

to JD Williams TA Marisota.

 

Its for Northampton county court dated 6th August.

 

How do I follow this up now with CCA requests etc?

 

I Have successfully defended 2 other claims with help from here

but it was about 6 years ago and

I can't remember what to do.

The amount is for £385.81 plus costs so totals £470.81.

 

I haven't paid anything on this account for about 4 - 5 years,

my hubby is no longer around and I lost my job so couldn't afford to pay.

 

Thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ack the claim

 

defend all on MCOL

 

get a CCA request to Cabot off

 

and a CPR to the sols.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I would.

 

CPR details are in the legal section of the library tab top left

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well Ive just received a reply from Mortimer...

 

'Further to your letter we are taking our clients instructions in relation to you request and will come back to you as soon as we can.

We confirm our client is willing to agree to the extension of 28 days for you to file your defence. Purusant to CPR 15.5(2) please notify the court in writing of the agreement.'

 

What is my next step now, I am going into hospital next Thursday for a major op and will be in for a few days and then have 8 weeks recovery time so want to make sure I sort things before I go in.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you answer the questions raised in this post here please

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-April-2014**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

It will give the legal guys the information they need to go on.

 

If the date of issue is 6 August you have 33 days from then (including 6th August) to file your defence so you have time.

 

No need to rush to get the defence in at the moment.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

Name of Claimant - Cabot Financial (UK) Limited

 

Date of issue - 6th August 2014

 

What is the claim for - By the agreement between J D Williams T/A Marisota ("Mari") & the defendant dated 18/09/2008 ("the agreement") Mari agreed to issue the defendant with a credit account upon the terms & conditions set out therein. In breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments due & the agreement was terminated. The agreement was assigned to the claimant on 13/01/2012. The claimant has complied with sections III & IV of practice direction - pre-action conduct. The claimant therefore claims 1. 385.81

 

Value of claim - £385.81 No interest shown added.

 

Claim is for a catalogue

 

Original agreement entered 2008

 

Debt purchaser has issued the claim

 

Yes I received a notice of assignment

 

Not sure if I received default notice from original creditor

 

Not been receiving statutory notices once a year

 

Ceased payments due to personal circumstances, hubby was no longer around and I lost my job.

 

No dispute with original creditor

 

Did not communicate any financial problems with original creditor due to the circumstances why hubby was not around.

 

Is this right? Not sure if I've answered evrything I need to.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much :)

 

Is this ok?

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.By the agreement between J D Williams T/A Marisota ("Mari") & the defendant dated 18/09/2008 ("the agreement") Mari agreed to issue the defendant with a credit account upon the terms & conditions set out therein.

 

2. In breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments due & the agreement was terminated.

 

3. The agreement was assigned to the claimant on 13/01/2012. The claimant has complied with sections III & IV of practice direction - pre-action conduct. The claimant therefore claims 1. 385.81

 

 

 

Proposed Defence

 

 

 

a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted. I have in the past held accounts with Simply B however I am unaware of any outstanding balances as alleged and it is therefore denied until such time the claimant can clarify and

comply with my request under section 78 of CCA1974.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is denied XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied and the Claimant is put to the strictest of proof on the same. The Defendant contends that no notice pursuant to s.136 & 196 has been served upon him by the Claimant as alleged or at all.

It is denied the claimant has complied with sections III & IV of practice direction - pre-action conduct.

 

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement/contract with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

 

 

3. As per Civil Procedureicon Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of

 

the consumer crediticon Act 1974.

 

5. On the 11th August 2014 I made a legal request by way of a section 78 request to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to comply and therefore is in default of this request and as such unable to request

 

any relief until compliance.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by Andyorch
Particulars added for cross checking
Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars brought forward and defence tweaked...you will have to complete your point 2.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, I dont need to add the particulars of claim to my defence do I? Sorry just have brain drain since my op and can't think of what to write, saw this in the post you linked, would it be ok as stands true? Thanks :)

 

Paragraph 2 is denied and the Claimant is put to the strictest of proof on the same.

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement/contract with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to add the particulars...that is there just to draft and check your defence in that you are responding to each and every point that the claimant pleads.

 

So you now state that their paragraph 2 is denied ...you didnt miss any alleged payments and the agreement was not terminated?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I read the wrong part. yes i missed payments, cont remember getting a letter of termination but the letter from Cabot saying they are asking for payment does this count as termination?

 

Can I just write paragraph 2 is accepted?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I read the wrong part. yes i missed payments, cont remember getting a letter of termination but the letter from Cabot saying they are asking for payment does this count as termination?

 

Can I just write paragraph 2 is accepted?

 

Thanks

 

Better to state it is denied because you never received a default notice from Simply B...if that's the case?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah bum, I just filed as I needed to get to bed. I accepted I didnt make payments but never received any default notice. I know when you miss payments you are supposed to get one but I didn't. Probably messed it up now, so ill at the moment and haven't got the energy to do this so will just see what happens next.

 

Thanks for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I got a reply a couple of weeks ago saying - "We are taking our clients instructions in relation to your defence and will come back to you as soon as we can. We will place this matter on hold until we hear further from it."

 

In the meantime I have had another claim form from the same, Cabot/Mortimer but for a different debt.

 

 

I acknowledged the claim and sent off CCA and CPR requests.

 

 

Today I have received a response exactly the same as the above one but also a without predjudice letter offering me 40% off the debt

and a form to fill in for my financial position and saying if I agree they will send me a Tomlin order.

 

 

Why have they sent this for this debt and not the previous one and I plan on ignoring the offer. Is this the right thing to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no right or wrong ER its your decision...I personally would sit tight and wait for both to be discontinued.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are offering a discount there more to be had then they are offering 99/100

get an sar off to the OC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...