Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your responses.  I feel a little bit better now.  I really got the wind put up me when I read about 'bad character and reprehensible behaviour of non-defendant witnesses' and the press guidelines from the Independent Press Standards Organisation. court-reporting-public.pdf (ipso.co.uk) Reporting Restrictions in the Criminal Courts (July 2023) (judiciary.uk) It's a tricky one because, without going into too much detail, all of the victims are of bad character already, otherwise they never would have met the accused, and I fear that the very much tumultuous relationship I have had with the victim that connects me to this case is going to be broadcast for all to hear. The accused isn't going to be anonymous, his name and even his home address were reported in the national press in the preliminaries.    Thank you.
    • How long is the finance arrangement for and how much has been paid?
    • From their own terms and conditions on the website... https://www.carfinance247.co.uk/terms-and-conditions 6.1 CarFinance247 Limited offers a: 6.1.1  web chat service ("Web Chat"); and 6.1.2  SMS chat service ("SMS Chat"), which, provided your application for finance has been approved and you have created a MyCarFinance247 account in accordance with these Terms, enable you to chat either online or via text message (as applicable) to one of our customer service specialists, without having to make a phone call.
    • I've had a text and email from MCB: "Dear XXXXX Please contact us today. Your payment has not been brought up to date and we would like to discuss your account with you as a matter of urgency. Our telephone number is 02039236888"   " Early investigations confirm you are resident at the above address. Despite this, we have not managed to speak to you about your now, seriously overdue debt.   We are now instructing our external debt collectors to contact you directly in relation to your loan account. If you want to avoid this course of action, contact us today on 0203 923 6888"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/cater claimform - cat 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3439 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Okay I just checked my credit file online, it appears there is a default on the file from Lowell. I've got 2 days left to file a defence, any ideas on how to proceed with this? (if at all!).

 

 

Look at all the other threads surrounding yours...most contain defences.

 

They dont have to issue a claim to place a default marker on your CRA,s.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Andy.

 

What I mean is, I was relying on my defence being that I hadn't signed a credit agreement - but have now found out that as the debt was online and post 2007 it's as good as having signed one.

 

Thus, I'm not sure I actually have a defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you still submit a defence....and put them to strict proof of disclosure...usually BC legs it for the hills at this point...if you dont its easy judgment for him.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I've taken this from a previous defence, and taken a bit out - not sure if it is correct if someone could please scan over it for me.

 

Just a reminder of the particulars of the claim :

 

This Claim is for £250 the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and/or services and/or goods

 

This debt was assigned to/purchased by lowell portfolio I ltd on 07/01/2013 and notice served pursuant to the law of property act 1925

 

particulars re : JD Williams

a/c number : >>>>>>>

 

and the claimant claims £250

 

the claimant also claims interesticon pursuant to s69 county courticon act 1984 from 07/01/2013 to date at 8% per annum amounting to 23.98

 

 

 

Here is the defence :

 

 

1. Paragraph 1 is neither admitted or denied with regards to the defendant entering into an agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim (‘the Agreement’) the Claimant has yet to disclose any such agreement.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant the claimant.

 

Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

3. As per Civil Procedureicon Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer crediticon Act 1974.

 

5. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

 

I believe that the facts stated in this claim are true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Okay had a letter from Bryan Carter which aparently contains a copy of a letter saying

 

"The claimant wishes to proceed with the case" allegedly from the court

and also that I can sign and return a "Consent Order" for either monthly payments or full sum,

 

which they have also included in the envelope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your decision Bedonde...do you wish to proceed or come to an agreement ? I certainly wouldn't pay the full amount.....offer a discounted amount as they do in their begging letters pre litigation.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would offer a settlement, only thing I'd want query before doing so is if this document is legitimate.

 

I've had nothing from the court themselves,

 

everything is on Bryan Carter headed paper,

 

apart from the consent order (which is just on plain paper).

 

(i.e - the "copy" of the letter which mentions that the claimant wants to proceed"

 

is on Bryan Carter headed paper, but had nothing from the court itself).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in that case everything hangs on the agreement and you decline their offer and proceed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Okay thought I would just update this...

 

Got sent a "Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track" this morning. I have also received a "Directions Questionaire", of which some sections are barely legible due to it being a really bad photocopy.

 

Am I obliged to fill in this questionnaire? I'm not sure what to do next...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can print out a new directions questionnaire from the HMCTS website if you can't read the copy you have.

 

You must file the completed DQ with the Court and serve it on the Claimant's solicitor by the date on the Court order or you will face sanctions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, just filling this out.. Tempted to go for mediation in this case and try and pay half the amount (if possible). Just think that at this late stage I don't really have much in my favour, as they have proceeded they obviously have the documents etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

All parties are expected to participate in mediation within the Small Claims Track...

 

Just because they have proceeded does not mean they have anything Bedonde...glad you are not my poker partner:madgrin:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Okay so just updating this.

 

The claim was allocated and I received a court order this morning. It says the claim has been deemed suitable for Small Claims Mediation and gives me details of how to contact them about mediation.

 

It also goes on to say the particulars of the order and a court date for December. So, do I contact for mediation or wait for the other party?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can contact them and then they will contact the claimant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Unfortunately had a lot on my plate these last couple of months, so put this to one side - having read the forms again though, realised I only had 7 days for mediation from receipt of the court order.

 

My court date is late December, assuming I lose will I be given the option to pay this off monthly or is all at once the only option?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you completed the court directions....submitted a Witness Statement and exchanged documents?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...