Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rights of a tenant to get extra keys cut? Plus other advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3617 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Asking a couple of questions on behalf of a friend.

 

She is disabled and rents a privately owned studio flat in a block owned by a private landlord. She has been on the waiting list with maximum points due to her disability for social housing for years but nothing suitable for her disabilities has come up and there are no other private rental properties suitable under the LHA where she lives.

 

Currently she has two main problems. One is a current tenant in the block leaves her pushchair up in the downstairs hallway and refuses to fold it down. My friend is unable to get by it due to her disabilities and is unable to move it, this means she is trapped in her flat and can't get to the main door to the building to let people in when they call for her (her carer or friend for example) When asked to fold up the buggy the owner just says that having a child is a disability and refuses to do so. The property owner has written several letters to the buggy owner asking her to fold it up to no avail and the property owner says that is all he can do. On occasion this has left my friend unable to get out to collect medication and buy food.

 

Secondly, when unwell or blocked in by pushchair she cannot get out of her flat to the main door of the building to let people in who are coming to help her. This is because the type of key to the main entrance is one that a key cutter is not allowed to copy without the owners permission. The owner says that his phone number is on the outside of the property and any carer can phone him and he would come over and let people in so has refused to give this permission for the key cutting but my friend needs regular support at all hours and it would be so much easier for there to be a second key to the main door so help could be available at all times. Does she have a right under the Equality Act to gain permission for a second key to be cut due to her disability, or does the property owner have a right to decline her request? This is the main question she has at the moment because if trapped in by the buggy, someone could pop round and move it for her so she could leave the building.

 

Thank you for your advice in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not certain how you would enforce it, but there's a fire safety issue here. Not only is the buggy an obstruction on the escape route, but it's a combustible item stored in a communal hallway. Maybe the fire brigade could bring some pressure to bear as the landlord is not managing effectively and is pretty much condoning the storage of the buggy. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to contact Shelter - they should be able to help you with the question regarding the Key cutting.

 

 

Contact Shelter's free housing advice helpline on 0808 800 4444 (calls are free from UK landlines and main mobile networks).

 

http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/private_renting

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot will depend on how much trouble you want to go to and also how thoroughly you are prepared to fall out with your neighbour.

 

Also, I suggest that you deal with the neighbour first and get that sorted because you may well need the assistance of the owner and so you don't want to get on the wrong side of him.

 

You have a county court action for nuisance at your disposal. Nuisance means interfering with the peaceable enjoyment of land. This peaceable enjoyment would include the right to have access to your own property or the right to be able to open the door to visitors.

 

I don't see too much problem on the basis of what you say of establishing here that there is a nuisance. If you decided to take this as a small claim then I would suggest that you would sue for a very modest amount of damages – maybe £50. Don't bother to seek a court order at this point but if then the nuisance continued I would begin the action again. If you won the £50 you could even give it back to the woman as a sign that really you are not trying to stick it to her, you are just trying to get some reasonable cooperation. You might need the cooperation of the property owner because they might have to give a statement.

 

If this course of action interest you then let us know and we can help you.

 

In terms of the access key, I don't see any problem. Of course you should have a key – or keys that you need. It may be that you would have to guarantee that they would not be lost or misused and the extent of the guarantee might amount to being prepared to pay for a new lock and new keys for everybody else in the building. This would probably a reasonable condition. If you wanted to deal with this, then I think that you might have to think about suing the landowner for a breach of contract on the basis that you have an implied right to have the keys that you need in order to enjoy the full benefit of your tenancy agreement.

 

Don't imagine that I am suggesting that you take these actions without trying to negotiate and to discuss first, but if nothing else works then these core actions would probably sort the matter out for you. However, as you can imagine it will probably damage relations for some time. The landowner is probably sensible enough to realise that if things get to this level that he ought simply just a cave in and give you the key. On the other hand the woman whose obstructing your passageway seems to be a bit more of a hard case. It seems to me as if she is standing on principle for no good reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Buggy - EHO / FB SO inspection declares any obstruction of common hallway a fire / safety hazard. LL erects sign saying 'any obsructiion in hallway will be removed, and acts on Notice. Nothing to stop neighbour folding the buggy and storing it inside her property, other than bloody mindedness.

 

 

2. Extra key - presumably a special Chubb security lock for all Ts security. If OP is given special treatment pres neighbour would also demand the same. I don't think Equality Act will help OP as all Ts are treated the same, for same reason.

I assume emergency services & utilities have access arrangements.

 

 

If the buggy problem is sorted, then OPs complaint disappears. Neighbour has been warned re obstruction by LL, so eviction notice follows. No need for OP to go to Court several times IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, that's all really helpful. I will pass this info on.

 

Previously she did talk to the fire brigade and she handed her keys through her window to them so they could let themselves in. She is no longer mobile enough to do that. They saw buggy and spoke to the landlord and the tenant owner of the buggy and for a while the buggy was kept there folded. But now it is almost always left up and when the fire brigade called again, they rang the buggy owner tenant's doorbell to get access to the building and she folded it on the way to answering the door.

 

Mariner, I think your suggestions re notice and then removal of the obstruction is a viable one the LL should take. But wrt the extra key, sure her disabilities mean that she should be allowed the extra key where other tenants aren't?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When asked to fold up the buggy the owner just says that having a child is a disability and refuses to do so.

 

 

I find this quite a bizarre statement !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...