Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Home insurance about to be cancelled for non-disclosure


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3612 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Really in a big fix and need your help guys.

 

I bought a house two years ago together with a conserrvatory which has been added by a previos owner about 10yrs ago.

 

Unfortunately, this was not built correctly from the start( I have just realised).

 

Previous owner I bought from may have investigated it but patched the problem before sale.

Unknowing to me the extent of the problem,

 

I bought the property and insured it as normal as the only questions on the compare site was :

Is the house in good state of repair and has it suffered from Subsidence.

 

Two years on, I have noticed further cracks apart from the previous one which has been patched

contacted the insurance company to see if I am eligible to claim.

 

They sent a Surveyor to come and inspect specifically for subsidence as they claim that is the only grounds on which they will pay out.

 

Surveyors report came up to say issue is not subsidense related but rather a bad design of the conservatory from the start

and inadequate foundation and that issue has been long standing because of previours repair .

 

I got furious that day cancelled the policy and switched my insurance to a diff. provider.

 

I have since been looking for a builder to rebuild conservatorry from scratch.

 

Company contracted by previous insurer has come back to me saying underwriters want to persue the case as Non -disclosure

as I did not tell them there have been previous repairs on it.

 

They are therefore requesting to have my pre purchase surveyors report which I have never had so got a copy from the bank.

 

This is where my problem starts.

 

The state of the conservatory was mentioned in the report which was unknown to me as I was a first time buyer

and did not know what should have been given to me.

 

Giving this report to them will be their evidence to stitch me up for non-disclosure.

 

Am I under any obligation to give them that report?

 

As I have already cancelled that policy with them,

can they still stitch me up for non-disclosure?

Is there anyway I can force them to close the case without any further actions

as I have now concluded to rebuild the whole conservatory from scratch.

 

NB: the main building is in perfect state just the conservatory which was not built properly.

 

Having sleepless nights as I have heard non-disclosure on my record will be disaster for good.

 

HELP PLEASE

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you don't have to supply information to a previous Insurers after cancellation. But you were showing a bit of inexperience in trying to make a subsidence claim for a badly built conservatory. The Insurers you submitted the claim to would have incurred expenses in sending out a loss adjuster/surveyor to your address. So I doubt they are happy with you and probably think you have given them wrong information on purpose.

 

Did you inform your new Insurers of this recent attempt to make a claim ? If not, your new policy would be invalid, as you have given false information. The subsidence claim will be on a central insurance database and your new insurers will see this. If you ever tried to make a claim and the Insurers picked this up, they may refuse to deal with the claim and cancel the policy.

 

I would probably advise you to write to the previous insurers to explain what has happened and see if they will remove the subsidence claim from the record, as it turns out that the conservatory was just not built properly. Apologise to them for your mistake, as this is the first house you have ever owned and you made an error in not getting the conservatory checked locally, before even thinking about submitting a claim. You don't have to send them a copy of the survey.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I have made a class 1 error then by what you are saying. I did not tell the current insurers about the failed claim as I know I am going to deal with it myself. It was the surveyor they sent who told me I should have done my own investigations first. This is my first home and first insurance so am really new to all this. Do I have to call and tell the new insurers now or I should finish the build and start all afresh. Also with the apology letter, any luck with a template of what the content should be and is it definite they will still record the non-disclosure even though the policy is cancelled?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you did not disclose the claim to your new Insurers, your new policy is pretty worthless. You could tell them now, but they would cancel anyway due to the non disclosure, which means you then have a cancellation due to non disclosure. So you might have the silly situation of cancelling the Insurance again, if you manage to get the previous Insurers to remove the subsidence claim. Then arrange Insurance with another company, disclosing that you tried to make a claim for a conservatory, but found out that it was just badly built.

 

My suggestion would be to contact the previous Insurers by phone first of all. Speak to the claims department about the claim to explain that as a first time buyer with no experience of houses or Insurance you rushed into registering a claim for potential subsidence, when it was just a badly built conservatory, nothing to do with anything that you could claim for. Ask them whether the claim can be removed or record changed, as it was not a vaid claim. Explain that having an invalid claim for subsidence on your record on the claims underwriting exhange database will now make future insurance arrangements more complicated.

 

See how you get on with that. You might be able to resolve by phone. There is no template letter. If you want to send a letter, you could say something similar to the above.

 

Summary

 

1) Phone or write to previous Insurers to see if you can get the claim removed or marked as not related to an insured peril. See how you get on.

 

2) Cancel the new Insurance, paying any cancellation fee due. Then start from scratch arranging a new insurance declaring that you tried to make a claim on x date, but found out it was just a badly built conservatory, which you are going to have rebuilt.

 

Expensive time consuming lesson, but hopefully a learning experience.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

The thing with non disclosure is you have to intentionally do it. This may be hard for the insurance company to prove and since there is no actual loss to the insurance company I would see little reason in them taking this further. The ABI has some great information around this area.

 

I look to say what the actual report says. If it says there is damage the insurance company may exclude this from any claims made. for instance they should still consider any claims relating to other parts of the property. But it is important to note to the new insurance company that you have tried to claim on your previous insurance and this was declined.

 

If the old insurance company want the report I would suggest giving them a copy. They have the ability to apply a 'fraud marker' against you which other insurance companies may be able to see. Can't see have you have done much wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...