Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander refuse payment


goodatresearch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3521 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They have no right to refuse it.

 

Best to take a payment slip into a branch and to pay it over the counter.

Keep all records and keep on doing that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She had no assets and is on a zero hour contract and I'm trying to help her with her debts. Tempted to write to themon her behalf to advise them that if they took her to court, the DJ wouldn't be impressed with them refusing direct payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't care about your letter.

 

If she has been paying via the internet, why can't she keep on doing that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing that the credit card has been closed?

 

If so, the payment would have been automatically rejected/returned because the credit card is closed.

 

The debt accumulated on the card still exists but you can't make payments towards it in the same way as if the account was still open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hmm just a question

Did she have any credit card charges applied to the account at any time eg Overlimit or Late payment fees?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked them to send me a 12 month statement of account showing all transactions in the year running up to default\when she had to stop using it. I think it had a few late payment charges on there, I'll have to check (2012).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be a good idea to do a full SAR request and do the £10 fee asking for everything. There are good templates available on this site. Then read some of the threads about claiming back credit card charges (even beyond 6 years)

 

Just to be clear is the santander debt a credit card debt or is it something else?

 

If the debt in the OP is a credit card debt then by beginning the reclaim process you will put the account in dispute. Depending on how old the charges are and how many the claim may even wipe the balance making the DCA irrelivent in this case all together

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a credit card and I've only got statements for 2012 when I thing charges stopped. Will check with noddle for details of when the account started before I advise on a SAR. However looking at the 2012 charges, they won't wipe out the debt but it may be worth it to slow down collection activity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats cool. The older the charges are the more they become worth to her as she will have several options when claiming them back to add interest to your claim.

Any charges added to your balance have had compounded interest charged of which you have the right to claim back also.

Below is a Barclaycard thread re: credit card charges.

Different bank so it may respond differently but the laws used to justify the claim are still valid and accurate.

 

If your daughter gets a full SAR *and* keep anything else that gets communicated to you then you will then have the infomation you need to make the right decisions.

 

If you need time to think and prepare a claim, you could have your daughter do a CCA request.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?309037-Charges-older-than-6-years-***WON***-Compound-Int-t-and-**NO-SET-OFF**

 

Other thing is avoid talking to them by phone. You will need everything in writing.

Edited by SabreSheep
Somehow I converted his Daughter into his OH - Woops So wrong on many levels

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

*edited above post*

I misread OP and in my reply converted your Daughter into OH! Correction made :p

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I'm guessing that the credit card has been closed?

 

If so, the payment would have been automatically rejected/returned because the credit card is closed.

 

The debt accumulated on the card still exists but you can't make payments towards it in the same way as if the account was still open.

 

I agree with this, sounds most likely the account is closed/frozen but the debt is still outstanding of course...So it remains 'open' for the purpose of showing the debt but not for processing any transactions directly...This is why you can see still it in places like Noddle as open or in default or whatever it says...

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter had the same problems with Santander and Freds. I write a letter of complaint and they said it wasnt closed or frozen, they were just returning it because they wanted her to pay Freds. Wrote to them again advising that she would only pay them and if they kept returning the payment it was their problem. Also pointed out that if they took her to court she had no assets and was on a zero hour contract and it wouldn't look good that they weren't mitigating their loss.

 

They wrote back and said she could continue via internet banking directly to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...