Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds TSB debt 1st Crud issue claim***Settled by Tomlin Order***


t_harv
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've had a similar letter come through from Northampton CC with the Claimant 1st Credit Ltd chasing an old Lloyds Bank debt which was sold to 1st Credit at the end of last year. I've not replied to their letters but tentative now due to the claim form now on my doorstep. Wondering whether to do similar as UK_Guy99 did and go straight to 1st credit asking to be put aside providing we agree a payment plan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi t_harv and welcome to CAG

 

I would suggest you start your own thread rather than tag onto one that's almost 12 months old on which UK_Guy never bothered to conclude.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, t_harv,and welcome to CAG! :-)

 

You'll need to start your own thread giving specific details of your debt, the date the account was opened, last payment you made, etc.

 

I think you should call it Claim from Northampton CC - Old Lloyds Debt - 1st Credit.

 

When did you receive the claim form?

 

If you post a link here we'll come to your thread to help you.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello to all those on CAG, hopefully someone much wiser than me can find me a solution!

 

I currently have four defaults on my credit file, one of which was placed by Lloyds TSB for an overdraft of just over 1XXX.XX in June 2011. The outstanding balance was since assigned to 1st Credit late last year and my credit file has another default showing under 1st Credit for the amount and 'Settled' under Lloyds TSB. I presume the latter will lob off soon enough (hopefully).

 

As I normally bury my head in sand once I receive paperwork, I've since ignored any letters from 1st finance for any payment agreements as their reputation via inspection online precedes them. The account was then 'passed on' to Connaught Collections who 'appointed' Moon Beever solicitors.

 

I today received a Claim form from Northampton CBCC stating the Claimant (1st Credit) claims the sum for debt and interest (interest being 8% per annum from when Lloyds assigned my account to 1st Credit last year). The Issue Date is 17 Apr 2014 and all payments must go to Moon Beever.

 

I would much prefer the CCJ not to stand as the 6 year cycle would restart following the issues of default almost three years ago. I presume I have to acknowledge receipt of the claim via online - just unsure of now the best process to avoid a CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1ST CREDIT (Finance) Limited - Date of issue – 17 APR 2014

 

POC - The Claimant claims the sum of 1XXX.XX for debt and interest. The Defendant from xx.xx.2008 held an account with Lloyds Bank Plc and it was assigned account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. Lloyds Bank Plc granted Defendant an overdraft facility. Lloyds Bank plc demanded repayment of the outstanding sum on the account at that time. The account was in default on xx.xx.2011 and the outstanding balance was 1XXX.XX.

On xx.xx.2013 the debt was assigned to 1st Credit (Finance) Limited in the sum of 1XXX.XX

Notices of Assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S. 136 Law of Property Act 1925.

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. The sum of 1XXX.XX

2. Statutory interest persuant to Section 69 of the County Court Act at a rate of 8% per annum from xx.xx.2013 to xx.xx.2014 xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.29 until Judgement or sooner payment.

 

It is the debt issuer who issues the claim and I did receive a Notice of Assignment. I need to check whether the Default Notice was issued by the original creditor (most likely yes). I have no recollection of annual “Notice of Default sums”. I stopped paying the original creditor due to me leaving work to go into further education. There were no disputes or DMP plans entered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Daniella. I shall contact the Claimant(?) tomorrow to see if we can come to an amicable agreement. In the meantime, I will start researching into old statements for any unfair charges.

 

With it being an overdraft, there will be no need for a CCA1974 request from myself? Any other information I could start requesting to get the ball rolling?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at statements, it appears that the balance requested on the claim form is +£150 than the original overdraft limit. I'm not sure what this is made up of, presuming it is unplanned overdraft fees and other fees leading up to the account going into default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to stop you acknowledging and defend all for now, once you have all the required info you can always negotiate if all in order. CPR 31.14 request to claimants sols for current ac

Edited by theoldrouge
mistype

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang 1st Credit twice to no avail but a person from Connaught rang me back to discuss options. Weird.

 

They stated that I had fourteen days to pay back in full (till tomorrow basically) and the CCJ would not go on my record and the default would remain. If I were to agree a plan, I would have to enter into a judgement. Another thing which confused me was that I could receive another fourteen days to potentially cough up the full amount and the CCJ would not go on record (apologies if I have misinterpreted this, I presume this is paying off the CCJ in a month and it being struck off the register). Basically, they stated the claim via court would not go away if paid in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no negotiating with this crew....defend all submit a defence and then force them to negotiate...you must go through the process..... there are no short cuts.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for your reply. AOS submitted and now preparing a CPR31.14.

 

Do I also at this point request for the clarification of the amount claimed being larger than the original overdraft?

 

Totally lost on how to determine the unfair charges that lie within the overdraft itself. How do I find and quantify those?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will put them to strict proof within your defence.Make sure you use the correct CPR 31.14 Current account request dont worry about quantifying for now.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Current account claim and defence in the following.....edit to suit.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?420527-MKDP-HSBC-A-C-all-charges-Claimform-received

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Andy. I shall edit to suit. To date I've received only an 'on hold' letter from their solicitors following the CPR production, nothing else.

 

Also I'm a bit miffed how just because I have misplaced my MCOL number, I can't re-access the particulars of my claim. There is surely something wrong there. Why claim's aren't assigned to Government Gateway's once the AOS is made, I don't know. I now have to email my defence and check via phone for the decision (I think).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Defence was submitted as per Andy's advice.

 

Received a Notice of Change of Legal Representative on the 3rd June from the Claimant along with two notice of assignments and statements from May 2008 to July 2011. They confirm that the debt is owing.

 

They will waive any charged interest applied to the account from the last payment made (early 2009) and accept a balance plus the Court cost if we agree to settle this out of court.

 

What are my options now? What is advisable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you post up your final draft of defence t_harv for reference.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

andyorch - see below:

 

The Defendant disputes the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.

 

DEFENCE:

 

1. It is admitted that the defendant held an account with Lloyds Bank Plc.

 

2. The defendant denies that the account exceeded the agreed overdraft limit due to overdrawing of funds but is as a result of unfair and extortionate bank charges/penalties being applied to the account.

 

3. The defendant refutes that the claimants claim is owed or payable. The amount claimed is comprised of amongst others default penalties/charges levied on the account for alleged late, missed or over limit payments. The court will be aware that these charge types and the recoverability thereof have been judicially declared to be susceptible to assessments of fairness under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 The Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National PLC and others (2009). I will contend at trial that such charges are unfair in their entirety.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

The claimant is also put to strict proof to:-.

 

(a) Provide a copy agreement/facility arrangement along with the Terms and conditions at inception, which this claim is based on.

(b) Provide a copy of the Notice served under 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974 Demand /Recall Notice and Notice of Assignment.

© Provide a breakdown of their excessive charging/fees levied to the account with justification.

(d) Show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

(e) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

(f) Show how they have complied with sections III & IV of Practice Direction - Pre-action Conduct.

 

5. On receipt of this claim I requested documentation by way of a CPR 31.14 request, which was received by the Claimant on the 6th of May 2014. The Claimant has failed to comply with this request.

 

By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...