Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning, I purchased a car from Big Motoring World on 10th December 2023 for £14899.00. On the 15th December I had a problem with the auto start stop function of the car in which the car would stop in the middle of the road with a stop start error message. I called the big assist and the car was booked in for February. The BMW was with them for a week and it came back with the auto stop start feature all fine and all error codes cleared on the report from big motoring world. within 5 days I had the same issue. Warning light coming on and the car stopping. I called big assist again and the car was again booked in for an other repair in May. Car was taken back in may, they had the car for a week and returned with the report saying no issue with the auto stop start feature and blamed my driving. Within 5 days of having the car back it broke down again. This time undrivable. I had the rac pick my car up and take to Stephen James BMW for a full diagnostic. The diagnostic came back with the car needing a new fuel system as magnetic swarf was found.  I have sent big motoring world a letter stating all the issues and that under the consumer rights act 2015 I have asked for a replacement vehicle. all reports from Stephen James BMW have been sent over to big motoring world. Big motoring world have come back and said they will respond to my complaint within 14 days for the date of my complaint letter. I am not feeling confident on the response from them, what are my next steps?   Thanks in advance. 
    • That is really good is that a mistake last off "driver doesn't have a licence" I assume that should be keeper? The Court requested me to send the Court and applicant proof of my sons disability from their GP this clearly shows he has Severe Mental Impairement, he is also illiterate.  I naively assumed once the applicant received this that they would drop the claim.  It offends me that Bank has asked the Judge to throw the case out at the preliminary hearing and to make us pay up.
    • Hi, we are looking to get some opinions on weather or not to bother fighting this PCN. This comes from a very big retail park parking where there are restaurants, hotel, amongst other businesses. The parking is free but I suppose there must be a time limit on it that I am not aware of. We were in the area for around 4 hours. Makes us wonder how they deal with people staying in the hotel as the ANPR is on what appears to be a publicly maintained street (where london buses run) which leads to the different parking areas including the hotel.  1 Date of the infringement 26/05/2024 2 Date on the NTK  31/05/2024 3 Date received 07/06/2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  YES 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Entry and exit photos however, based on the photographs we are almost sure the photos are taken on public street. This is the location I believe photos are taken from.  https://maps.app.goo.gl/eii8zSmFFhVZDRpbA 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? UKPA. UK Parking Administration LTD 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] The Colonnades, Croydon, CR0 4RQ For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. British Parking Association (BPA) Thanks in advance for any assistance.  UKPA PCN The Collonades-redacted.pdf
    • Thank you for posting their WS. If we start with the actual WS made by the director one would have doubts that they had even read PoFA let alone understood it. Point 10  we only have the word of the director that the contract has been extended. I should have had the corroboration of the Client. Point 12 The Judge HHJ Simkiss was not the usual Judge on motoring cases and his decisions on the necessity of contracts did not align with PoFA. In Schedule 4 [1[ it is quite clearly spelt out- “relevant contract” means a contract (including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land) between the driver and a person who is—(a)the owner or occupier of the land; or (b authorised, under or  by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land; And the laughable piece of paper from the land owners cannot be described as a contract. I respectfully ask that the case be dismissed as there is no contract. WE do not even know what the parking regulations are which is really basic. It is respectfully asked that without a valid contract the case cannot continue. One would imagine that were there a valid contract it would have been produced.  So the contract that Bank has with the motorist must come from the landowner. Bank on their own cannot impose their own contract. How could a director of a parking company sign a Statement of Truth which included Point 11. Point 14. There is no offer of a contract at the entrance to the car park. Doubtful if it is even an offer to treat. The entrance sign sign does not comply with the IPC Code of Conduct nor is there any indication that ANPR cameras are in force. A major fault and breach of GDPR. Despite the lack of being offered a contract at the entrance [and how anyone could see what was offered by way of a contract in the car park is impossible owing to none of the signs in the WS being at all legible] payment was made for the car to park. A young person in the car made the payment. But before they did that, they helped an elderly lady to make her payment as she was having difficulty. After arranging payment for the lady the young lad made his payment right behind. Unfortunately he entered the old lady's number again rather than paying .for the car he was in. This can be confirmed by looking at the Allow List print out on page 25. The defendant's car arrived at 12.49 and at 12.51 and 12.52  there are two payments for the same vrm. This was also remarked on by the IPC adjudicator when the PCN was appealed.  So it is quite disgraceful that Bank have continued to pursue the Defendant knowing that it was a question of  entering the wrong vrm.  Point 21 The Defendant is not obliged to name the driver, they are only invited to do so under S9[2][e]. Also it is unreasonable to assume that the keeper is the driver. The Courts do not do that for good reason. The keeper in this case does not have a driving licence. Point 22. The Defendant DID make a further appeal which though it was also turned down their reply was very telling and should have led to the charge being dropped were the company not greedy and willing to pursue the Defendant regardless of the evidence they had in their own hands. Point 23 [111] it's a bit rich asking the Defendant to act justly and at proportionate cost while acting completely unjustly themselves and then adding an unlawful 70% on to the invoice. This  is despite PoFA S4[5] (5)The maximum sum which may be recovered from the keeper by virtue of the right conferred by this paragraph is the amount specified in the notice to keeper under paragraph 9[2][d].  Point 23 [1v] the Director can deny all he wants but the PCN does not comply with PoFA. S9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN only quotes the ANPR arrival and departure times which obviously includes a fair amount of driving between the two cameras. Plus the driver and passengers are a mixture of disabled and aged persons who require more time than just a young fit single driver to exit the car and later re enter. So the ANPR times cannot be the same as the required parking period as stipulated in the ACT. Moreover in S9[2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; You will note that in the PCN the words in parentheses are not included but at the start of Section 9 the word "must" is included. As there are two faults in the PCN it follows that Bank cannot pursue the keeper . And as the driver does not have a driving licence their case must fail on that alone. And that is not even taking into consideration that the payment was made. Point 23 [v] your company is wrong a payment was made. very difficult to prove a cash payment two weeks later when the PCN arrives. However the evidence was in your print out for anyone to see had they actually done due diligence prior to writing to the DVLA. Indeed as the Defendant had paid there was no reasonable cause to have applied for the keeper details. Point 24 the Defendant did not breach the contract. The PCN claimed the Defendant failed to make a payment when they had made a payment.   I haven't finished yet but that is something to start with
    • You don't appeal to anyone. You haven't' received a demand from a statutory body like the council, the police or the courts. It's just a dodgy cowboy company trying it on. You simply don't pay.  In the vast majority of these cases the company deforest the Amazon with threats about how they are going to divert a drone from Ukraine and make it land on your home - but in the end they do nothing.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CH4 prog How to get a Council House. Any thoughts?


Shendor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3706 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I can see both sides of the debate here - I don't think anyone will change their views, even with stats to back up each viewpoint. My issue with Tower Hamlets is that 80% of the Bangladeshi community are in social housing, rising to 93% of Somali community. I make no comment whether they are second generation born here or otherwise. It makes no difference. What worries me is the ghettoisation of large Islamic populations in London (and I'm lead to believe across large parts of Birmingham, Leicester, Bradford etc - although I haven't experienced this first hand so am relying on news stories). However, in London I have my own empirical evidence and what worries me is of all ethnic communities it is ALWAYS without exception the Islamic ones that have issues with integration, learning the host language, fitting in with the wider society. Islam is a religion which is tolerable when in the minority, but, as in Tower Hamlets it is almost the majority and we are already seeing, Sha'ria law courts, Halal only in schools, Muslim patrols telling women to cover up and insulting gays.

 

Of course the easy way to shut down this debate is to simply call me wacist, boo-hoo, bad man, nasty man. However, in the next twenty years at current birthrates in London, the issue will find you whether you choose to ignore it or not.

 

I have no issue with people in genuine need claiming benefits - after all, I DO SO MYSELF!! My worry is with a certain section of society that thinks itself above fitting in, and seeks to change the host community, whilst all other races, religions, cults, ethnicities just seem to fit in and muddle along.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My only argument here is that the benefit system before the welfare reforms and even now is a shambles - it cannot be perfect but at the moment it is also not very good, that is evident. I have no problem with genuine need and fleeing from opression BUT why is it the majority of these people who I feel genuine pity and sympathy for by the way, make their way to the UK to seek asylum? It is because, after all the reforms and talking non stop we are still, as a nation, an easy touch compared to other countries - this needs to change, people are taking advantage of the system and stopping GENUINE UK citezens getting the help they need i.e. housing, healthcare etc. Anyone that says immigration is helpful to the country is in some aspects right, if their is a contributory factor. If no contributions have ever been made surely they are a drain and not a resource? It is a road that is fraught with danger, we cannot be seen to be 'cleansing' but on the other hand we cannot carry on the way we are at the moment. What are the answers and solutions? I really don't know, I don't think there is one and that is the problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm,there is a lot of muslims in tower hamlets that is true,I noticed on the tv show they kept away from that point,the problem with muslims is there is no living with them unless your a muslim! that could be a definite problem with muslim people as they get moved out from high muslim areas to low muslim areas,probably a good thing for society as a whole,talking about racism,the most racist people I have ever met have all been muslims,they don't like anyone that aint a muslim

Link to post
Share on other sites

My only argument here is that the benefit system before the welfare reforms and even now is a shambles - it cannot be perfect but at the moment it is also not very good, that is evident. I have no problem with genuine need and fleeing from opression BUT why is it the majority of these people who I feel genuine pity and sympathy for by the way, make their way to the UK to seek asylum? It is because, after all the reforms and talking non stop we are still, as a nation, an easy touch compared to other countries - this needs to change, people are taking advantage of the system and stopping GENUINE UK citezens getting the help they need i.e. housing, healthcare etc. Anyone that says immigration is helpful to the country is in some aspects right, if their is a contributory factor. If no contributions have ever been made surely they are a drain and not a resource? It is a road that is fraught with danger, we cannot be seen to be 'cleansing' but on the other hand we cannot carry on the way we are at the moment. What are the answers and solutions? I really don't know, I don't think there is one and that is the problem.

 

The UN convention on Asylum states that those fleeing persecution should find the nearest safe haven country. Hmmmm, anyone been to Calais recently? How many countries must these economic migrants traverse before reaching the land of milk and honey (milking money?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm,there is a lot of muslims in tower hamlets that is true,I noticed on the tv show they kept away from that point,the problem with muslims is there is no living with them unless your a muslim! that could be a definite problem with muslim people as they get moved out from high muslim areas to low muslim areas,probably a good thing for society as a whole,talking about racism,the most racist people I have ever met have all been muslims,they don't like anyone that aint a muslim

 

To be honest, I think this is the real idea behind the benefit cap - social engineering. Those affected are primarily in London due to extortionate rents, and inner London is where these Islamic ghettos are established. By forcing them to move and disperse it is a back-hand way of stopping the trend. Of course the ConDems would never admit to this, but I'm not sure I wholly disagree long-term either. Although my genuine sympathy is with those who have to leave their support networks, schools etc. But whoever said it was a perfect world. And if you are getting 'something for nothing' then you can hardly complain. If you don't like it, then use your own initiative to make money instead. Too harsh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do my own research that's how I know this to be fact,I certainly don't read right wing propaganda mags,I live in the real world.

 

So do I, which is why I know fact from fiction. :)

 

Too harsh?

 

Yes. Try applying that to MP's who do play the system far more then any other social group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, but one group are meant to serve this country and they should be setting an example. Instead they are the biggest offenders, far outstripping anything done by anyone else.

 

I can't disagree with you there ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding Muslims wanting to live in their own communities and resisting 'integration'. The way I think about it is how would I feel if I lived in a country where lots of people were fearful, or hated, or were prejudiced or bigoted against people like me. Where I might be subject to verbal or physical abuse because of what I chose to wear or the religion I practiced. Well, taking these things into consideration, I think I would want to live somewhere I felt safe, among my own community to start with. Then I think I would find that the way I and people like me were treated and the way people like me were viewed and portrayed in the media would discourage me from wanting to 'integrate'. I would be telling my children to stay away from those that I felt might hurt them and discouraging them from making friends with people not like us. And the continual assault on my culture and religion would make me want to become more protective of it, not less. I might be constantly wary and distrustful of people not like me.

 

 

Ignorance breeds contempt, on both sides of this issue. I lived in Bury Park in Luton for a while, and yes I was treated with suspicion, as an outsider, but I could see how this view had come about and could sympathise. Sadly, contempt on both sides also breeds more hard lined views and violence (on both sides).

 

 

I really don't think it is feasible to break up communities like this by trying to move people out. I do believe, personally, that faith schools are not a good idea (even though I went to a fantastic faith school, they are not all like the school I went to). I think understanding of different cultures, religions and ways of life comes with being together and learning about each other and that schools and workplaces are an excellent place for that to happen. Of course where you have large communities of one culture or religion, it makes cultural and religious diversity in schools problematic.

 

 

Personally, I have found living and working in a cultural diverse society enriching. I take time to learn from the different people around me about their cultures and religion, and have found those around me to be very open to discussing their way of life and beliefs. Should housing policy try and force this type of interaction - I don't think you can force people to interact, but then the ghettoization of places like Bury Park in Luton and then the forming of groups such as the EDL really needs to be avoided.

 

 

I don't have all the answers - these are really difficult problems. But I think a good place to start is with ourselves, and try to at least start to tackle our own personal 'ignorance'.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding Muslims wanting to live in their own communities and resisting 'integration'. The way I think about it is how would I feel if I lived in a country where lots of people were fearful, or hated, or were prejudiced or bigoted against people like me. Where I might be subject to verbal or physical abuse because of what I chose to wear or the religion I practised. Well, taking these things into consideration, I think I would want to live somewhere I felt safe, among my own community to start with. Then I think I would find that the way I and people like me were treated and the way people like me were viewed and portrayed in the media would discourage me from wanting to 'integrate'. I would be telling my children to stay away from those that I felt might hurt them and discouraging them from making friends with people not like us. And the continual assault on my culture and religion would make me want to become more protective of it, not less. I might be constantly wary and distrustful of people not like me.

 

 

Ignorance breeds contempt, on both sides of this issue. I lived in Bury Park in Luton for a while, and yes I was treated with suspicion, as an outsider, but I could see how this view had come about and could sympathise. Sadly, contempt on both sides also breeds more hard lined views and violence (on both sides).

 

 

I really don't think it is feasible to break up communities like this by trying to move people out. I do believe, personally, that faith schools are not a good idea (even though I went to a fantastic faith school, they are not all like the school I went to). I think understanding of different cultures, religions and ways of life comes with being together and learning about each other and that schools and workplaces are an excellent place for that to happen. Of course where you have large communities of one culture or religion, it makes cultural and religious diversity in schools problematic.

 

 

Personally, I have found living and working in a cultural diverse society enriching. I take time to learn from the different people around me about their cultures and religion, and have found those around me to be very open to discussing their way of life and beliefs. Should housing policy try and force this type of interaction - I don't think you can force people to interact, but then the ghettoization of places like Bury Park in Luton and then the forming of groups such as the EDL really needs to be avoided.

 

 

I don't have all the answers - these are really difficult problems. But I think a good place to start is with ourselves, and try to at least start to tackle our own personal 'ignorance'.

 

 

Well done Estellyn - a heartfelt, if a little naive, post.

 

I'm not talking about 'Muslims' as a block group. I'm talking about Sunni Muslims. I live in Tower Hamlets where without exception all the Shia/Shi'te Muslims from Iran and Turkey are getting on just fine. But there is a hardcore Sunni/ Wa'habi majority who have it in their culture to proselytize and change any society they find themselves in, and if they can't weed us out, they'll breed us out. It truly is a medieval blood cult. Most Muslims I know where I live who are Sh'ia find it really problematic too. A case in point being that a huge majority of the girls on the street wearing niqab and burkhas are third generation to the UK - their parents and grandparents tell them that they fought oppressive horror to get the right to uncover their faces, so why go back to it now?

 

I have no answers either. But I worry about this whole 'fake-liberal acceptance of everything for fear of being seen as intolerant' trip that you are on. It comes from the right place for sure, but wait till Saudi funded Islam is in the majority in London - see how far your platitudes get you then. lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Esteylln - a heartfelt, if a little naive, post.

 

I'm not talking about 'Muslims' as a block group. I'm talking about Sunni Muslims. I live in Tower Hamlets where without exception all the Shia/Shi'te Muslims from Iran and Turkey are getting on just fine. But there is a hardcore Sunni/ Wa'habi majority who have it in their culture to proselytize and change any society they find themselves in, and if they can't weed us out, they'll breed us out. It truly is a medieval blood cult. Most Muslims I know where I live who are Sh'ia find it really problematic too. A case in point being that a huge majority of the girls on the street wearing niqab and burkhas are third generation to the UK - their parents and grandparents tell them that they fought oppressive horror to get the right to uncover their faces, so why go back to it now?

 

I have no answers either. But I worry about this whole 'fake-liberal acceptance of everything for fear of being seen as intolerant' trip that you are on. It comes from the right place for sure, but wait till Saudi funded Islam is in the majority in London - see how far your platitudes get you then. lol.

 

 

I'm certainly not on any 'fake liberal acceptance trip'. All I do is put myself in another person's position and think 'how would I feel in that situation'. Just because I can understand the conclusions a person has come to, does not mean I agree with them - just means I understand how they got to that place - I understand how a right wing Tory gets to the views they have, doesn't mean I don't loathe their views. I hardly presented any platitudes - in fact I stated that I didn't know the answers for the difficult questions. And if you knew me, you'd realise I'm anything but naïve.

 

 

And perspective is everything - where I live it is the Sunni who are seen to be integrating and the Shia who are not. Many of the Muslim women I know, who didn't before, started wearing hijab or niqab because of the hostilities towards their religion both here and abroad - a way of affirming their faith and a protest against western society. Regardless of what their grandparents went through, they see their faith 'threatened' and some become more hard lined because of this. It is difficult for the younger generation who have never been there and lived it, to realise the horrors of being a woman living somewhere like Iran, they are too far removed in this country from the oppression faced by their grandparents, and it is naïve to think that some words from their grandparents will carry more weight than what they see and experience around them now.

 

 

A 'fake liberal acceptance trip' would indeed be damaging. Neither of us have any answers, but first we need to identify the issues and the causes before people wiser than me can attempt to come up with solutions

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

And perspective is everything - where I live it is the Sunni who are seen to be integrating and the Shia who are not.

 

I don't mean to sound rude, but you've just proved you don't really know what you're talking about. Most Shi'a Muslims don't even wear the hijab let alone the niqab or burqa. It's an affectation of Sunni only, and comes from the need for men to control their women. I'm sure you mean well, but you really need to understand what you're talking about before just blindly defending anything that challenges your liberal sensibilities. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mean to sound rude, but you've just proved you don't really know what you're talking about. Most Shi'a Muslims don't even wear the hijab let alone the niqab or burqa. It's an affectation of Sunni only, and comes from the need for men to control their women. I'm sure you mean well, but you really need to understand what you're talking about before just blindly defending anything that challenges your liberal sensibilities. ;)

 

 

You do sound rude and also offensive and condescending. You speak about being grateful people are not shutting your right wing comments down as a racist, but are quick to dismiss a person as a liberal; sounds rather hypocritical. You also sound as if you have a axe to grind on the religion issue.

 

 

I don't profess to be an expert - unlike you who claim to be an expert on every town in the UK and it's demographics.

 

 

My husband's aunt lives in Iran and is a Shia Muslim and has experienced huge issues because of the subjugation of women she experienced there. Control of women is cultural, and not solely religious and crosses many borders. I worked with a Jehovah's Witness from Bangladesh who wore a headscarf. I regularly discussed religion with a (male) Sunni co worker who was a really nice, gentle guy - his wife wore western clothing. My understanding (limited though it is) is that there are different sub sects even within the major sects of Islam, and that an individual's Imam can have a big influence.

 

 

Or to be plain, I prefer, personally to look at the individual I meet, rather than making big judgements about 'groups'.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally I don't think there is any place for any religion in the 21st century,all religion seems to be a giant step backwards,surely as these people that have immigrated here to the uk get a decent education they will see religion for what it is,fairy tales, and probably there will be more harmony in our society,there does seem to be a lot of religious teachers coming to this country bringing their point of view from where they come from and filling the heads of the young here with it,maybe that should be discouraged .

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally I don't think there is any place for any religion in the 21st century,all religion seems to be a giant step backwards,surely as these people that have immigrated here to the uk get a decent education they will see religion for what it is,fairy tales, and probably there will be more harmony in our society,there does seem to be a lot of religious teachers coming to this country bringing their point of view from where they come from and filling the heads of the young here with it,maybe that should be discouraged .

 

 

Although the world might be better, I think people tend to always find something to fight about. I think it will be a long time before we've all evolved to live peacefully. I don't think you can prevent people having religious beliefs - some people need a way to explain the world around them and get scared and unfilled if they think it's all just evolution and chance with no guiding 'presence'. Even if I don't believe, I don't feel it's for me to try and take away the comfort their religion brings to them. But yes, my husband also calls it 'fairy tales'.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do sound rude and also offensive and condescending. You speak about being grateful people are not shutting your right wing comments down as a racist, but are quick to dismiss a person as a liberal; sounds rather hypocritical. You also sound as if you have a axe to grind on the religion issue.

 

 

I don't profess to be an expert - unlike you who claim to be an expert on every town in the UK and it's demographics.

 

 

 

Or to be plain, I prefer, personally to look at the individual I meet, rather than making big judgements about 'groups'.

 

 

Yawn. Sorry if I threatened you. Yes I'm sure everything you say is wonderful.... Carry on... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yawn. Sorry if I threatened you. Yes I'm sure everything you say is wonderful.... Carry on... ;)

 

 

methinks I fed a troll....

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it makes you more comfortable to believe that rather than analyse reality, then fair enough. x

 

 

You live in your reality, I'll live in mine, and let's leave it at that.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah methinks you're right. Best not engage with them anymore.

 

Sorry you feel that way. Yeah let's get all Mumsnet about it and shut down anyone who has an opinion that makes us think.

 

Let's all stay comfortable and grateful for the wonderful responses... ;)

 

Sorry if I offended anyone or made them think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3706 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...