Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

pcn/parking ticket


Guest HUSBANDKHAN
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6378 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest HUSBANDKHAN

a few pointers on what can and cannot be done with pcns.

 

if the parking attendent has started to write the ticket out you can drive off. the ticket is not valid as long as it has not been handed to you or been stuck to the vehicle.

it is also illegal for parking attendants to stand in the front of your vehicle when you are driving off !!!

 

you have 15mins grace from the time stated on your pcn before you get clamped.

also you cannot get a pcn within 12 hours of the original ticket unless your vehicle has moved from the spot.

there are others but they will not let me write these down. i have been through parking tickets bailiffs/courts etc and know my way around like the back of my hand. anyway click the scale if you think what i have told you is worth it !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, parking attendants can (and do) just bin the driver's copy in the nearest receptacle, and then when the paperwork arrives through the post, it is your workd against theirs that the ticket was never applied to the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely - so if you expect them to bin it, there's little point in making a getaway, unless you've video evidence (or an independent witness) to back you up - which usually means partners and spouses are ineligible....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me but shouldn't we all just be law abiding citizens and park within the remits of the law? That's the ONLY real way to avoid getting a parking ticket !

NatWest

 

Statements sent for - 18/09/06

Statements received (in full!) - 03/10/06

Initial letter of claim sent - 05/10/06

Offer received for £1,400 approx - 21/10/06

LBA sent with acceptance of offer as part, will pursue for the rest - 21/10/06

Reply to LBA received (forwarding to Cust. Rel to deal with) - 25/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never got a parking ticket :)

NatWest

 

Statements sent for - 18/09/06

Statements received (in full!) - 03/10/06

Initial letter of claim sent - 05/10/06

Offer received for £1,400 approx - 21/10/06

LBA sent with acceptance of offer as part, will pursue for the rest - 21/10/06

Reply to LBA received (forwarding to Cust. Rel to deal with) - 25/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope Khan I have Jaguar XKR, V8 4.2 litre .......... i have a very rich husband ! lol

NatWest

 

Statements sent for - 18/09/06

Statements received (in full!) - 03/10/06

Initial letter of claim sent - 05/10/06

Offer received for £1,400 approx - 21/10/06

LBA sent with acceptance of offer as part, will pursue for the rest - 21/10/06

Reply to LBA received (forwarding to Cust. Rel to deal with) - 25/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

The parking attendants now take a photo of your car with the ticket attached to the wind shield, to prove it was lawfully served.

 

Once they start writing the ticket, that's the end of it. You have to prove your innocence.

 

I am with Tigerlilly on this one, pay your parking fee, check where you park and you remain clean.

 

I have never had a parking ticket or a traffic infringement in 47 years of driving in five countries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Khan, there's one going second hand if you're interested? here's the link Jaguar, XK Series Xk Xk V8, 4.2, 2 dr - Yahoo! Cars

NatWest

 

Statements sent for - 18/09/06

Statements received (in full!) - 03/10/06

Initial letter of claim sent - 05/10/06

Offer received for £1,400 approx - 21/10/06

LBA sent with acceptance of offer as part, will pursue for the rest - 21/10/06

Reply to LBA received (forwarding to Cust. Rel to deal with) - 25/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tiger, ive been parked in a box with a paid parking ticket in my windscreen, showing the time and date, that corresponded with the time and date of the so called offence. I knew id done nothing wrong, even checked I was parked correctly because I was becoming paranoid about getting tickets as they arrived accusing me of illegally parking, when I had no recollection or ticket. Still the process whereby you dispute that fact is a farce, and in the end its youre word against the wardens. The reponse from the authorities is:

 

I have read youre account of the incident carefully. Unfortunately, it conflicts with the parking attendents account. The Council and its agents employ only trained and accredited attendents to act as expert witnesses.In the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, I must presume that the parking attendents account of the circumstances is accurate.

 

Therefore Tiggy, you need to carry a camera at all times and when it happens to you, you know youre being conned and the only assumption I could make was that the attendents were on commission or bonuses, dependent on how many people they could stitch up in a day.

 

On another occassion, I actually had a policeman who just so happened to be passing. Assure me I was not illegally parked or on a yellow line. He gave his number and station telephone number to act as witness. An owner in the shop I had just left, saw the same, and wrote a letter witnessing the event too. Do you think that stopped the council from continuing with their action? No

Link to post
Share on other sites

a few pointers on what can and cannot be done with pcns.......................................

 

it is also illegal for parking attendants to stand in the front of your vehicle when you are driving off !!!

 

 

Whether it's illegal or not I guess they'd be b****y stupid to stand in front of a car they were just ticketing!!!!!!

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HUSBANDKHAN

Its if you do not know what they are and arnt allowed to you would not move your car as it was against the law which it is not !!!

theyre not even allowed to stand on the road while writing a ticket out. the most they can do is stand on the kerb . I know this because i had a run in with tickets. hEnce know where to stand my ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we should be looking for ways of not paying parking tickets when we have parked in the wrong place how scally is that. don't brake the law and you won't get fined, simple as that who needs all the hassel. I admit there are the odd few TWs who will put a ticket on anything thats stood still long enough but most tickets are for parking offences.

Pen

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately, I think the overiding sentiment on here is quite moral, if you get caught, then take the punishment - however if there is skulduggery involved with a less than scrupulous TW, I see no reason why they should not be held accountable for their actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we should be looking for ways of not paying parking tickets when we have parked in the wrong place how scally is that. don't brake the law and you won't get fined, simple as that who needs all the hassel. I admit there are the odd few TWs who will put a ticket on anything thats stood still long enough but most tickets are for parking offences.

Pen

 

I agree that if you break the law, you should pay the fine.

 

However, the law cuts both ways. The authorities have to abide by the law in how they create, sign, mark amd enforce parking restrictions. If they cannot work to the letter of the law, then any resulting ticket is void and not payable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had 4 tickets recently for parking outsidemy house, which i have done for the last five years and now suddenly we have these community support officers who think they run the village!! ( there are no markings near my house, its a clear road) They have even been stopping people and searching them which only a police officer can do apparently. Any way i have now discovered that the tickeys are invalid and i would like to claim the money back does anyone have any idea where i start. I am thinking of writing to the magistrates court and appealing but not sure what the correct way is. can anyone help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HUSBANDKHAN

As you have paid you have admitted liability. You can only write in to the magistrates and see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are the tickets 'invalid'? If you mean they've been issued without lawful authority - then wrtie to the issuer stating this and that they have 14 days to repay thew incorrect fines. Failure to do so will result in you issuing a Small Claims Action for the recovery of your funds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tickets have several errors.

on one the ticket was not signed and also the location is just main street, which happens to be over a mile long, i have learnt that the ticket must be precise as to where the alledged offence took place. on another the date is for next year, talk about getting your quota in!!.

I am thinking of going to the courts and asking them how i can get my money back, i dont think that just cos i paid i accept liability, if i can fight what i consider to be unjust i will. surely if the ticket issued was invalid then any subsequent action becomes unlawful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...