Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Is this a new parking event or have you posted about it before please? HB
    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to approach some of the payday lenders and their ridiculous charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3504 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Right got a reply back from them quoting me a statement from Mr Lender, I will have to think about how exactly I should write to them to say that the intrest and charges are unfair. The 120£ have not been charged back to me, by the way so that is totally wrong.

 

And Mr Lender themself said I could pay 400£ to clear my account before they handed it over to MMF, can I claim that? Saying that Mr Lender themself offered me to pay 400£ and be done with it, and then use a payment plan from that amount?

 

Here is what their "statement" said:

 

 

"

Date Type Details Auth Code Debit Credit Balance

03-Mar-14 03:56 InitialLoan Capital £400.00 £400.00

03-Mar-14 03:57 InitialFee Same Day Fee £10.00 £390.00

03-Mar-14 10:19 InitialFee Admin Fee £7.00 £383.00

03-Mar-14 11:04 InitialFee Total Fees £17.00 £400.00

03-Mar-14 11:04 Interest Interest £120.00 £520.00

01-Apr-14 07:17 Payment Interest Pay 005969 £120.00 £400.00

01-Apr-14 09:25 Interest Rollover £120.00 £520.00

02-May-14 09:12 Fee Failed Card Fee £20.00 £540.00

06-May-14 09:22 Fee Letter Fee £20.00 £560.00

09-May-14 09:27 Fee Letter Fee £20.00 £580.00

02-Jun-14 10:03 Interest Missed Interest £156.00 £736.00

02-Jun-14 14:08 Refund Chargeback £120.00 £856.00

03-Jul-14 10:00 Interest Missed Interest £238.80 £1,094.80

04-Aug-14 10:00 Interest Missed Interest £310.44 £1,405.24"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget what MMF say. SAR the OC.

 

Stop falling for MMF's lies, and stop playing letter tennis with them. The account is in dispute so use the time you have to get as much info as possible from the real source. Not what MMF make up.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So, Wageday advance have been very persistent in trying to contact me, 3 times a day on my cell while I am at work.

 

I sent them an email saying I will pay them 20£ next month, and stop calling me. That did not happen.

 

Now, out of interest I took one call when I got home ( I know I should not talk to them, but hold your horses). I just wanted to see what bs they could come up with.

 

So, First, she claimed that email was not secure enough to send account details on. (their account details), but she told me their details anyway, which I will use.

 

Second, she said to able to set up a payment plan etc they needed income expenditures, and two months bank statements. I said, there is no way I am giving you my bankstatements and you are not legally required to have them

She said "Yes, according to the FCA we must have that to backup your income so we can make sure you can afford it."

 

Surely that is the biggest lie ever? They are not required to have anything I believe and certainly not something as personal as bank statements.

She said that anyone could put anything on there, that is why she needed proof. I offered to send my payslips, but it was refused.

 

Thirdly: I said that, calling 3 times a day is harassment, when I've told them to stop.

Again, she points to FCA that telephone is a legal way of contacting me, even after when I requested this to stop.

 

 

She would stop the calls for 2 weeks now, but if I didn't provide any documentation before that they would start calling again.

 

So, obviously I will not deal with any payment plan on the phone, as I want that in writing only.

So, what documents can I send them to force stop the calls here? Is there any email template I could send them, or does it have to be by letter?

 

And also preferably force them to accept only a basic income/expenditure form. Do I really even need to send that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ONLY thing they need is a simple budget summary, NOTHING else whatsoever. With point 3, i would have recorded that and reported it. Once a debtor has told a creditor that all contact is to be in writing, the creditor must adhere to it. Otherwise they border the line of harassment.

 

If she is threatening to start calling again, get that in writing ( they will never confirm that in writing ;) ) or record it. They would be in serious trouble if it found its way to the regulators.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...