Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

carter/lowells claimform - JDW shoe tailor cat debt*** Claim Dismissed***


MarcyKerry
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

this is for an old Shoe Tailor account from Dec 2004.

 

I've checked my credit record and it's showing Lowells default date 4 January 2012.

 

I have had no letter of intent from the Solicitors?

 

I have made payments to this debt so pretty sure it is not statute barred.

 

It has been to lots of different DCAs.

 

I have now entered into a Debt Management Plan and Lowell have more than one account with me and do know this.

 

I had passed accounts to Stepchange, which i informed all creditors of.

 

Having checked my email I only put reference for the other account i have with them in the email

i sent them notifying them of my move to Stepchange.

 

I believe I last paid this account on the 23rd December 2014.

 

The particulars of the claim are:

The claim is for 3352.20 the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and/or services and/or goods.

 

The debt was assigned to/purchased by Lowell Portfolio Ltd on 20/12/2012 and notice served pursuant to the law of property act 1925.

 

re: JD Williams account.

 

 

What do I do now?

 

As its a catalogue I'm guessing they wont have nor need a signed agreement?

 

Also I can only see 12 months of my record on my credit file

but believe this debt has become more than double the original value i had with Williams originally

as although i was making payments they charged me more than my payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Marcy and welcome to CAG.

 

If you type Lowell into the search bar top right in the grey strip under the CAG logo and this will reveal a plethora of threads of others in the same scenario as your self...just follow a thread most similar to yours and subscribe and follow the instructions they have already been advised.

 

Anything you are not sure about just post here and I will pop in to clarify anything

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you done the CCA request to lowells

and the cpr 31:14 yet?

if not do so.

 

don't bother writing to carter he just messes around.

 

on a PS I hope you've done this with all your debts through stepchange [a cca request]?

they wont bother to ever check they are legit/

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unsually we WOULD say send to the claimants solicitor [CCA/CPR]

 

HOWEVER, if you read a few carter threrds of recent

 

all he does is sends a std response wasting your time

hoping you'll throw the towel in.

 

send them to LOWELLS.

 

as for step change

 

yes get a CCA request to everyone being paid thru the DMP

though PDLs or bank accounts aren't really worth it.

 

you say you've issues with PDLS

 

theres a payday loan forum here

you might find it useful to start a thread on each one there.

 

the guys are very good on that forum

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, A couple of Qs as I'm getting different info:

 

1) at what point were digital signatures available/ catalogues became enforceable without a physical signed agreement?

 

The reason I ask is National debt line advised April 07? My account was opened in 2004.

 

2) why would my original debt not appear on my credit report for this?

It's only showing Lowell,

to the best oft know I defaulted on this account back in 2006 .

my report show default issued by Lowell's oddly in 2012 but no history passed 2013 at all ?

 

Can I default twice?

 

Why no record before April 2013?

 

I've sent a SAR to williams also will they still hold records??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooh!!

You know I said I contacted all creditors?

 

Found one for Bryan Carter.

I told them I was paying them money and quoted reference

and as I had not heard from them please could they confirm why I was paying them and any account numbers.

 

They replyed on 18th fen as follows:

 

Dear xxxxxxx

 

We are no longer instructed in this matter.

 

If you need further assistance pin this matter please contact our client at the following address:

 

JD Williams/Reliable Collections

Martin House

23 Hunts Bank

MANCHESTER

M3 1AX

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Bryan Carter Solicitors LLP

11 De Havilland Drive, Weybridge, Surrey KT13 0YP Tel: 0845 219 8686 Fax: 0845 223 5656

e-mail: [email protected]

 

Members: Bryan F Carter,Ian Marsden, Mary Kelly

Associate: Katharine Smith

Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Bryan Carter Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales with Registered number: OC351865.

Registered Office: 11 De Havilland Drive, Weybridge, Surrey

 

hmmm so how can they them start court claim for this??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, A couple of Qs as I'm getting different info:

 

1) at what point were digital signatures available/ catalogues became enforceable without a physical signed agreement?

 

The reason I ask is National debt line advised April 07? My account was opened in 2004.

 

2) why would my original debt not appear on my credit report for this?

It's only showing Lowell,

to the best oft know I defaulted on this account back in 2006 .

my report show default issued by Lowell's oddly in 2012 but no history passed 2013 at all ?

 

Can I default twice?

 

Why no record before April 2013?

 

I've sent a SAR to williams also will they still hold records??

 

when you debt is sold

the new owners name replaces that of the original creditor

they WILL need a signed agreement to win I suspect.

 

await your CPR/CCA returns

 

JDW SAR very good idea

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Sent SAR to JD WIlliams whom have aknowledge however no response as yet.

 

 

Sent CCA to lowells - no acknowledgement or anything.

 

 

Sent CPR to Lowells and to Bryan Carters.

 

 

Got what looks like a standard response from Bryan carters declining to send me anything.

Lowells again not responded,

I will double check recorded delivery info later today when I get home,

however this was sent on 5th March.

 

As mentioned above,

I did email BCarters who told me they no longer are dealing with this debt and to contact JD Williams on 18th Feb.

They then seemed to quickly issue a claim to an alternative address

- claim date 26 on form February.

Think they were trying for a CCJ by default.

 

 

I now need to submit my defence

- I've been working on this and will submit shortly for advice.

Is it usual for Lowells not to respond?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim:

The particulars of the claim are:

 

The claim is for ... the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and/or services and/or goods.

 

The debt was assigned to/purchased by Lowell Portfolio Ltd on 20/12/2012 and notice served pursuant to the law of property act 1925.

 

Note: default on my account shows against lowell debt on the 4th January 2012 - does this contradict the above???

Defence

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

2. I contacted Bryan Carter prior to this claim requesting information on alleged debt who responded on 18th February 2014 stating they were no longer instructed in this matter and to contact their client JD Williams/Reliable Collections. - should I include this? if so is it worded correctly?

3. I have contacted JD Williams, whom I was informed by Bryan Carter was the original creditor, from whom the debt was assigned by to clarify matters by way of full details of how this claim is made up via a SAR on 5th March 2014 by registered 1st Class Royal Mail post, who have acknowledged the request and I am now awaiting response.

 

4.The claim is denied with regards to an amount due under an agreement.The Claimant/Solicitor has refused to disclose any agreement or statements on which its claim relies upon.

 

3. On receipt of this claim I requested information pertaining to this alleged debt from the Claimant by way of a CPR 31.14. Bryan Carter Solicitors' response stated they will not comply and that its based on a simple contract which I should have in my possession.

4. A CCA request was sent to Lowell Portfolio I, by 1st class recorded delivery using royal mail postal service on the 5th March 2014 and thus far they have failed to respond.

 

Therefore with the courts permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

 

(b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for;

 

© show how the agreement was legally terminated to allow the claimant relief.

 

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. As per Civil Procedureicon Rule 16.5, it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

6. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally would remove 2/3 Marcy..the above defence is one of mine and drafted as to to put the claimant to strict proof to disclose.

All defences should start with either....... I accept... I admit... or I deny... I refute

 

The points you have added add no value or merit to the defence and should be retained for later in the process.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy. I've just checked and the piggin CCA sent to Lowells seems to be lost in transit!! The tracking still showing drop off and no delivery !! Argghhh,, I can send a new one today and will go post office now, not sure how this effects defences??? :S

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could send a further request it has no effect on the defence ...the fact that you have made a request is suffice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget to print off your receipt as proof of submission.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

received what looks like,

viewing other forums,

 

a standard reply from Bryan Carters.

 

One is a copy addressed to court stating they wish to proceed.

 

The second is worded as follows:

 

Please see attached copy of letter sent to the court confirming that the claimant wishes to proceed with the Claim at this time.

 

The claimant agrees in principle to mediation.

 

We should also be greatful to hear from you in relation to without prejudice negotiations and you may contact us on (telephone number).

 

Should i contact them???

 

Or await papers from court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its your choice Marcy...if you feel you can proceed to trial and present the defence in court you ignore.....if mediation is of interest in ending it now then you approach them...possibly by Consent/Tomlin Order.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE SAR from JDW.

 

Got this through. Includes along list of charges and payments and lots of page saying "no details available"

 

I have attached a summary of the main details.

 

They've provided the balance of my account when passed to these- going to check payments in bank to see if sum in POC is correct. I'm a little shocked at the sum of the account assuming this is all charges?

 

Any advice or help with Math would be appreciated!!

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]50086[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...