Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Replying to above  this was on the day that two store detectives approached me and my friend and took us into the back room and spoke to us when they explained they have been watching
    • as my learned friend above...and.. sadly because just like DCA's and initially yourself in this case, you believed they have some magical powers ...they DON'T. 85% of people blindly pay DCA's cause they know no better and think they are BAILIFFS. only the RETAILER can ever do court and none have done this on a silly member of joe public that did something stupid since the infamous 2012 Oxford case on retail loss. BAILIFFS can only ever be involved after you've been to court and lost a CCJ, fat chance re above... and anyway, no BAILIFF has any right of forced entry anyway on consumer debts even with a judgement so......... stop panicking and thinking everything that doesn't apply.. forget about them but p'haps a confidential GP visit might be a very good move... what slightly concerns me more here is:  who are 'them' that told you they'd reviewed a week of CCTV and come up with several shoplifting instances over that time amounting to the above? have you directly contacted or had contact from Sainsbury's? and know they HAVE done this? or is this DWF willy waving and they tricked you into  admitting several previous successful thefts... this is not the norm...  dx      
    • next step then await the N157 from her local court giving the time and date of a future hearing some month in the future. now she MUST file a witness statement 14 days (typically) to both the court and kearns .  so cant allow to much of a time lag before you are aware of that and get her WS done. wack us up 2 multipage pdf files please  one of what they returned for the CRP reply . and one for everything they sent back in 2022 you've found.  we do not need statements. ideally it would be nice to see their WS before hers is finally filed. dx  
    • Another interesting article in the Grauniad - Counterfeit barcode stamps furore carries echoes of Horizon scandal | Consumer affairs | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Royal Mail admits its scanners ‘make mistakes’ but stands by the process it uses to detect fakes as ‘robust’  
    • DWF can't do anything as they act for a client. In this case, Sainsbury's. Sainsbury's could take you to court and ATTEMPT to get a CCJ but it's unlikely. They had no interest in dealing with you at the time. All DWF can do is send out pointless threatograms. They'll threaten to divert an Iranian drone to your house if you don't pay. However, they can't attempt to get a CCJ against you. IGNORE THEM. It's more important now to understand why you were allegedly shoplifting, and you should speak with your GP and try and get yourself signposted to the support that's available.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Application for money held in court.


Nick0
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3749 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a problem that I cannot find an answer to. We bought a property by cash in 2007 and then we took out a "Mortgage" on the property with Abbey National (aka Santander) then I took out an unsecured loan, and credit card with Nationwide and all was good.

 

My business went bust with the collapse of an airline and all went belly up with my house being reposessed(bySantander asMortgagee) and charges put on the property by Nationwide to cover debt (I never challenged the charges as my wife had a breakdown and could not cope).They reposessed the property in 2010 and put it up for sale.

Late 2010 we drove past the property and thought we had squaters and we had to contact Santander to be told the property had been sold (they had our new address but never told us) and the surplus money (£32k)was held with there solicitors.We contacted there solicitors and they said that Nationwide could not sort out a settlement figure due to a lack of information.

I have spoken to the solicitors so many times and it was stall stall stall, with the money not gaining any intrest I wrote a complaint (2012)and left it at that.I called the off spec in July 2013 and they told me due to Nationwide not providing the information they have placed the funds with the Court Funds service and upon writing to them Ihave recieved a N244 form to fill in requesting why I should have the money?.

Now due to my debts (Nationwide) I wont get any money back but my wife should be entitled to half of it as the debts where in my sole name.

 

When filling in the form do I ask for all the money due to incompetance from Nationwide or just for my wifes share, Do I also mention on the N244 the charges that are present or do I leave them off.

 

It seems the Nationwide problem is due to them changing solicitors at least three times and they cannot locate there paperwork.

 

Any help would be great.

 

Nick

Edited by Nick0
extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I think we would need a few more details on the legal background to the payment. Was there a court order authorising the money to be paid into court - presumably Abbey issued a formal application notice at some stage? Do you know if Nationwide were notified?

 

If Nationwide are involved then, ideally, you would write to Nationwide's solicitors with your proposal and seek their consent in order to avoid going through court hearings and so on. I agree that your proposal should probably be releasing half the money to your wife and half to Nationwide to be paid towards your debt.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for your reply, There was no court order authorising the payment to the court. From what I understand Santanders solicitors who where holding the surplus funds had NO luck with Nationwide so decided the lodge the funds with the court to get it off there hands. Nationwide have been shocking in all this and I dont want to contact them in case it ruins my claim (hence advice needed).

The charges that where placed on the property it seems Nationwide are having a problem finding the paperwork so I was thinking about making an application to the court for the funds based on the time its taken?.

Would I have to state there are charges on the property on my claim form or is that not my concern?.

I would pay for a solicitor to handle this but we have lost so much money I just dont know what to do.

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that they would have needed a court order to pay the money in, otherwise people could in theory use the Court Funds Office as a current account! I think you would do well to get the case details from Santander's solicitors and then make an application in that claim for the money to be paid out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I am a bit surprised that they just paid the money into court without an order authorising them to do so setting out how the money should be dealt with. Please double check that these details were not contained in the other court orders there must have been in the repossession case generally.

 

If there is no court order, there should at least be a form F100 filed, presumably under the case number of the repossession claim. Best to try and get a copy of that form from the court or from Santander.

 

Unless there was a court order involved authorising the payment into court, based on a literal reading of the rules (CPR part 37) I am not 100% convinced you would need the court's permission to withdraw the money. In this situation there would be no need to file an N244. In such a case you may be able to simply file form 201 with the court funds office and get the dosh. Although if this is the situation it would defeat the point of Santander paying the money into court in the first place.

 

I think you need to contact the court funds office and see what documents they would need to release the cash.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have a copy of the letter from the court to Santanders solicitor. The house was repossessed and Santander was paid 100% what they where owed.There solicitors have been holding on to the surplus funds trying to get the information from Nationwide.

The solicitors lodged the funds in to the court using a CFO108 form and the reason is quoted as "Surplus proceeds of sale of property".

I spoke to the court funds office (Glasgow) and they put my on to the Royal Court of Justice Chancery Division.

The only thing I can find out is that the original order for repossession was granted at that court (so I was told).

On the letter from the solicitor/court there is no mention of any other parties.

 

I can scan and message (in private) the documents I have if required.

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

My best guess is that there is something in the reposession order which authorises the payment into court. I imagine this order will also talk about the conditions on which the payment may be released.

 

If you don't have the order, the next step is to ask the court for a copy. The RCJ is a bit of a maze but you should be able to find the phone number for the Chancery Division on the website.

 

While you are at it, it is always worth checking that the fees etc. deducted from the purchase price match what they were allowed to do under the order.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The solicitors have given me a copy of the completion statement but I cannot get hold of the person at RCJ to get a copy of the repossession order as they never answer or return my calls.Is there a form I can download and put in an official request?.

Any Ideas

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it also be possible for me to challenge the CCJ's then if successful get the Charges removed?

 

The grounds would be that despite me giving them my new address (a have an acknowledgement from there solicitors via email date and time stamped ) and I also sent a change of address form through the branch.

 

Nick

Edited by Nick0
Link to post
Share on other sites

Been there done that with the difficulties you are having with the RCJ. Are you trying a particular person? Try someone else ... there must be someone able to help in the Chancery Division. I know its frustrating and the way they run their phone system is incredibly frustrating but best to keep trying over the phone if you can. I doubt there is a particular form, you could always write a letter but no guarantee it would be responded to in a timely fashion.

 

You have given very little information about the underlying circumstances so very difficult to comment on whether it would be possible to challenge the CCJ. Are you saying they sent papers to your own address which were not responded to and they ended up with judgment in default as a result?

 

If a judgment in default was issued because you didn't respond to documents sent to your old address, you are supposed to challenge it promptly after finding out (meaning within 2 months). If the underlying CCJ was granted back in 2010 it won't be realistically possible to challenge it now, especially if there have been contested repossession proceedings off the back of it. If the completion statement does not reflect the order in some way then you could perhaps challenge the statement.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...