citi A word of encouragement for citi claimants

[CrispDust]

LTWFB - man you're such a tease, but I know you relish winding up the citi peeps

[gizmo111]

LTWFB - man you're such a tease, but I know you relish winding up the citi peeps

 

Now now - all we have tried is to enter a sincere and meaningful dialogue with citi.

[e28bigalbexley]

Look forward to the proverbial poo-poo hitting the fan in Salford soon.

 

What like this

 

AL

 

 

 

 

 

[gizmo111]

What like this

 

AL

 

 

 

:lol:

[Enron]

I was speaking figuratively, not literally.

[puppylove]

Good Luck! LTWFB

[lickthewallfatboy]

things move quite slowly over here!Don't have any new updated info for you yet...will have to inquire as to the state of play.....

[hondamad21]

very interesting thread,

 

Cannot wait to see what the latest twist is

 

just wanted to say good luck to everyone !

[mr.sshh]

I second that emotion!

[mr.sshh]

LET'S GO TO WORK

[Enron]

Citi are still citing your case LTWFB in their AQs submitted to court, received a copy of it this morning and low and behold they are still trying to use Kissick v Citi as a defence.

[unitboy]

Court date with Citi in Northern Ireland on 11 December 2006.

Mr Smith has entered the following notice of dispute to the court: "My client does not owe any money to the claimant."

 

His defence reads: "The respondent denies that the charges are punitive in nature or exceed any actual loss arising to the Defendant from the Claimant's breaches and puts the Applicant to proof that the clauses complained of are a disproportionate penalty clauses and/ or unreasonable;"

 

"The Respondent avers that the Applicant's claim is not a money claim but a damage action and further avers that the Applicant's interest calculation is not applicable to this action or, if it is applicable to this action, that it is incorrectly calculated and the Respondent puts the Applicant to proof that this interest is owed."

 

" The Defendant avers that under common law and contract law it is entitled to recover its losses as a result of the Claimant's breaches. It avers that it has recovered such losses only and will adduce in evidence the basis of such charges."

 

All the above in inverted commas are his exact words.

 

Any thoughts?

[marcopolo]

This looks like their standard defence I had something very similar

[TBeckett100]

them ruddy avers.

[gizmo111]

Court date with Citi in Northern Ireland on 11 December 2006.

Mr Smith has entered the following notice of dispute to the court: "My client does not owe any money to the claimant."

 

His defence reads: "The respondent denies that the charges are punitive in nature or exceed any actual loss arising to the Defendant from the Claimant's breaches and puts the Applicant to proof that the clauses complained of are a disproportionate penalty clauses and/ or unreasonable;"

 

"The Respondent avers that the Applicant's claim is not a money claim but a damage action and further avers that the Applicant's interest calculation is not applicable to this action or, if it is applicable to this action, that it is incorrectly calculated and the Respondent puts the Applicant to proof that this interest is owed."

 

" The Defendant avers that under common law and contract law it is entitled to recover its losses as a result of the Claimant's breaches. It avers that it has recovered such losses only and will adduce in evidence the basis of such charges."

 

All the above in inverted commas are his exact words.

 

Any thoughts?

 

More or less standard defence - I bet they request adjournment until LTWFB appeal has been heard.

[Lula]

Just subbing to this thread, good luck LTWFB

[debt_mountain]

Court date with Citi in Northern Ireland on 11 December 2006.

Mr Smith has entered the following notice of dispute to the court: "My client does not owe any money to the claimant."

 

His defence reads: "The respondent denies that the charges are punitive in nature or exceed any actual loss arising to the Defendant from the Claimant's breaches and puts the Applicant to proof that the clauses complained of are a disproportionate penalty clauses and/ or unreasonable;"

 

"The Respondent avers that the Applicant's claim is not a money claim but a damage action and further avers that the Applicant's interest calculation is not applicable to this action or, if it is applicable to this action, that it is incorrectly calculated and the Respondent puts the Applicant to proof that this interest is owed."

 

" The Defendant avers that under common law and contract law it is entitled to recover its losses as a result of the Claimant's breaches. It avers that it has recovered such losses only and will adduce in evidence the basis of such charges."

 

All the above in inverted commas are his exact words.

 

Any thoughts?

How long after aknowledgement did they file the defence? was it just before the 28 days were up?

[gizmo111]

How long after aknowledgement did they file the defence? was it just before the 28 days were up?

 

The yare pretty quick with defence - mine was 17 days after issue.

[unitboy]

Hi

 

Defence was filed within 7 days.

[gizmo111]

Hi

 

Defence was filed within 7 days.

 

Mine was back in August - they obviously are faster at cut and pasting now!

[debt_mountain]

Reason I was asking was because they seam to have forgotten to file a defence and the 28 days are up. Awwww poor them.

 

Will need to send off my request for judgement tomorrow.

 

Any links to any other claims they have done this with and what they do? Do they tell loads of prokies to the judge or just payup.

 

I will give them 4 days to pay up just as a gesture of good will.

 

ta

[keren29]

check out my thread debt mountain. They didn't file a defence, I got a judgement by default and went to a hearing with them.

[lickthewallfatboy]

Reason I was asking was because they seam to have forgotten to file a defence and the 28 days are up. Awwww poor them.

 

Will need to send off my request for judgement tomorrow.

 

Any links to any other claims they have done this with and what they do? Do they tell loads of prokies to the judge or just payup.

 

I will give them 4 days to pay up just as a gesture of good will.

 

ta

 

don't be too disappointed if you find that they faxed a defence through at the very last minute,or even next day-the courts seem to play very fast and loose with deadlines in these cases....

[debt_mountain]

don't be too disappointed if you find that they faxed a defence through at the very last minute,or even next day-the courts seem to play very fast and loose with deadlines in these cases....

why are the courts allowed to do this. A deadline is a deadline. Can we not take the court to court..

[jax1964]

When Citi did not file a defence against my claim I got a judgement, only for them to have it set aside claiming they had not received the particulars. I have now received their defence and the AQ's have been submitted to the Court.

Good luck with your claim.