Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
    • Normally we don't advise playing your cards early in a snotty letter, but as you have appealed we might as well use what you wrote in the appeal against them. There is no rush, you have until 6 July to get it to them.  See what the other regulars think too. How about something like this? -   Dear Rachael & Sean, cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea you'd actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and would cough up! As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence.  Had you done so you would have seen that I appealed to your client.  Indeed the driver on the day is a textbook example of having done exactly what you should do when you do not wish to be bound by the T&Cs in a private car park. Of course none of that mattered to the spivs you represent but do you really want to put such a useless case in front of a judge? To be fair, your clients are very useful members of the human race - as comedians.  How I loved the page turner of their antics at The Citrus Building in Bournemouth.  It was chuckle after chuckle reading about them, letter after letter, month after month, insisting they were legally in the right, even through someone who had done just the first day of a GCSE law course could have told them they weren't.  Until the denouement - BOOM - an absolute hammering in court.  In fact - SLAM, BANG - managing to lose twice against the same motorist for the same car park in front of two different judges. Your client can either drop their foolishness now or get yet another tolchocking* in court where I will go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spend the dosh on a nice summer holiday, while every day laughing at your clients' expense. I look forward to your deafening silence. COPIED TO COUNTRYWIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT LTD   *  This word is used under licence from Brassnecked
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest, Capquest and CCS Collect


chiefmegawatty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am being chased by Capquest for a debt of £550

 

which came about due to bank charges with Natwest from 2006.

 

Back then I had no income and was unable to pay the bank charges.

 

Natwest closed my account in 2007 and

 

I never heard any more about it until

 

December 2011 when a demand letter arrived from Capquest.

 

I ignored the letter because I had never borrowed any money from Natwest and therefore considered that I owed them nothing.

 

Many more letters arrived threatening me with all sorts of terrible things but nothing happened.

 

In Feb 2013 after 15 threatening letters from Capquest I obtained my credit reference agency credit report which

 

showed the alledged debt and Capquest were the owners of the debt.

 

I noticed there was a default date recorded of 23 May 2007.

 

Therefore the alledged debt would become statute barred on May 23 2013.

 

Sure enough at the end of May 2013 this default was removed from my credit report as I expected.

 

Despite this, Capquest continued to send letters but offered a large reduction for prompt payment.

I ignored them so

 

they recently passed the debt onto CCS Collect who have sent me more demand letters.

 

In their latest letter thay say if they don't hear from me they will pass the debt back to Capquest for further enforcement.

Seems to me that these DCA's are barmy.

 

I wonder why Natwest didn't take me to court back in 2006 and also why Capquest didn't take me to court before the statute barred date.

 

Maybe because the alledged debt purely consisted of bank charges there would have been little chance of them obtaining a CCJ against me.

 

I have recently considered sending the statute barred letter to the DCA to stop them bothering me.

 

However, I find it quite amusing how they are happy to keep wasting money on paper, envelopes and postage charges chasing statute barred debt.

 

By ignoring all their letters they must surely realise that they can't frighten me into paying, so why do they continue?

 

I know they are legally entitled to chase statute barred debt but surely by now they would have realised they had bought a lemon.

 

Well they say you can't educate pork.

Edited by chiefmegawatty
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Send them a Statute barred letter.

 

As for the SB date, it can be up to 6 months before the default date.

 

Proof its SB? Theyve offered you a huge discount. Get that letter off, and theyll go away.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I your 1st post - you assumed a common mistake..well poss two actually...

 

there is little or no relationship between a default notice letter date or a 'default' date on a CRA summary with the statute barred date.

 

there is also 'currently' conjecture on CAG as to 'when' a bank account which has/had an OD IS actually statute barred.

 

sadly, the jury is still out at present.

 

however, you need to nail down WHEN YOUR last financial transaction was.

 

in this case it appears there were none after the issue of the DN,

 

'we presently think' that the SB clock starts one day after the date the quoted DD/MM/YYYY on the DN

 

as long as YOU have made no in/out following that date....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they become SB. Get the letter off.

 

As said, the law says they can continue chasing you, and even issue a court claim against you, until you notify them otherwise. Get the letter off, and theyre buggered. They may come back and try and lie by saying that you made a payment in 2008, but we can easily give you a letter to tell them where to go and you are now making a full complaint as they are trying fraudulant tricks.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sent the statute barred letter via email to CCS Collect and had an automated reply as copied below. I therefore assume that they cannot claim that they didn't receive my email.

 

We acknowledge receipt of your email. Replies will be dealt by normal postal methods or by phone for security reasons and by strict order of receipt.

If you have not received an expected response within 7 workings days, please call 0844-412-0344, it maybe that you did not quote your CCS or Payment reference number which we would need to locate your account.

 

Regards

 

Correspondence Team

CCS Collect

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a written reply from CCS Collect.

 

They claim that a payment was made towards the debt on 28th March 2013

and is therefore not statute barred.

 

They request that I phone them to discuss this. I have no intention of speaking to them over the phone.

 

Their claim that a payment was made is total rubbish.

 

However

I did notice that the amount being demanded dropped by £10 somewhere between Feb 2013 and Aug 2013 when Capquest were sending me letters.

I assumed that was an admin error.

 

Seems that my sending the statute barred letter has opened a can of worms.

I assume I now need to ask them to prove that a payment was made and by whom.

Their lies and deception are now beginning to really wind me up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them to prove it. Its a well known con used by a lot of DCA's to try and get the debt not SB. Tell them that if they do not provide conclusive and complete proof that youm ade the payment towards the debt, you will go to the regulators with an accusation of fraud.

 

You want the method of payment, the palce of payment, amount, date, any serial numbers etc etc. Call their bluff.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter written and sent as per your good advice.

 

CCS Collect don't realise that I have been monitoring my credit report on a monthly basis throughout 2013

which clearly showed that no payment was made in March 2013 or at any other time.

 

I will be astonished if they produce details of a payment that never happened.

 

Hopefully they will back off now and close the account.

 

They have mentioned that they will pass this back to Capquest if I don't pay up.

 

I don't see what good that will do them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever the outcome, make sure you let teh regulators know whats going on. The DCA will claim it as an admin error, but that just shows that if its true, their systems are not fit for purpose. Think how many other people they have done this to, and who have fell for it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think DCA's need tighter regulation to stop them trying to fool people into paying statute barred debts by fraud and deception. However, how can a person fall for this if they know full well that they have never made any payments? I am surprised that CCS Collect think they can convince me that I made a payment when I know full well I never have. They seem to assume that I'm thick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember, the majority of people with debts have no idea of the legalities of it, or even phrases such as statute barred/CCA/SAR etc.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes understood. However CCS Collect are still chasing a debt after I wrote to them saying I don't acknowledge the debt, won't be paying and telling them it's way past it's statute barred date. I will complain to the OFT as CCS seem to be acting outside the guidelines. Should CCS write back with a load of fake payment details I will be tempted to take them to court myself for attempted fraud using my house as security to pay the legal fees. I own a large piece of land in Wiltshire so I could sell that to fund taking CCS to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats because CCS is a bottom of the barrel DCA> WHat they do is threaten and say anything to get you to pay them. ANd lots of people do, just to make them go away.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know what CCS come back with. If you genuinely havent made a payment, it will be very easy indeed. I bet you they will try and say you made apayment with a postal order or through your bank. If they say postal order and you challenge it, theyll say they dont have the details anymore.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never made a payment and never acknowledged the debt. I will let you know immediately after I receive a reply from CCS. I have all my bank statements dating back over 16 years. The postal order accusation is interesting, but how can they prove I made a payment with no details of any postal order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No clue. But they'll try. For now though, you've called their bluff. The ball is in their court now so lets see what they do next. They might simply go quiet, not contact you and pass the debt on. If they do so, then you can simply resend the SB letter and tell the new DCA they just took on a lemon debt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHat it means is that the DCA and the current owner should mark the file as SB and cease all collection activity. Should they pass it on to someone else, then you can make complaints against both. Especially if you notify the new DCA that the debt is SB. It may take a while to get through to them. Remember, their main business ethic is to harass and intimidate and lie to get money from debtors. It works the vast majority of the time, so they continue. Thats why you MUST make full complaints to all concerned.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...