Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, I think UK will get same deal as EU.  Main reasons for this are two sectors,  Defence and Financial Services.  US have huge levels of money invested in the UK, so they have a self interest in offering a trade deal as good as the EU.
    • @labrat I'll bet it isn't the subframe itself that's broken. It'll be the subframe mounting bolt(s) that have sheared off inside it. Because the bolt is seized inside the subframe, it effectively renders the subframe scrap. I suspect the garage are simply talking in terms the average customer is more likely to understand than going into the detail of it. The Golf, Jetta and Beetle, which are all mechanically identical, are notorious for it.    A smaller independent garage may have tried to get the bolts out, but you very quickly reach the point where time/effort/cost is simply not worth it and replacement of the whole subframe is the better choice.   Of course the OP could approach a salvage yard, either local or online, and ask about the cost of a good used item, which would be substantially less expensive than what I assume is the price VW are charging for a replacement.
    • Applied for and awarded by BY in Sept 2020 still not received it yet Comments appreciated
    • Hi Slick   I am not as experienced as you is there any thing in sar that i can identify. It does not state £2.5k debt in sar. It mentions new add ons.
    • So long story short.   I had a number of re-occurring loans with Unclebuck, I made a complaint in regards to my latest one back in 2019, got to an agreement to remove default markings and charges etc and just pay the principal. Didn't pay the outstanding amount due to personal reasons, being put on Furlough was one of them.   Saw that Unclebuck went into administration, made a redress application a couple of weeks ago, got awarded £807 for previous loans (not the latest one). So I contacted the administration to confirm they would pay the redress amount towards my outstanding balance, but they said they cannot do so?   How is that fair? I get they they can't pay me any cash, but surely they should be able to write off the current outstanding amount, it has to work both ways right? This was the latest response I got, so far no reply from their solicitor yet.   "Whilst I note your comments concerning your desire to set off Redress due in respect of unaffordable loans against your current loan that was not eligible for Redress, unfortunately the Administration precludes the position of set off until the Administrator makes a declaration under Rule 14.29 of the Insolvency Rules 2016. This declaration has not been made by the Administrators and will not be made as there is no distribution or intended dividend to be made to creditors in this particular Administration. Whilst I sympathise with your position, you will appreciate that the Administrators are governed by statute and cannot contract out of it.   I promise to speak to our solicitors to see if there is any room for manoeuvre on this matter and will come back to you afterwards, however I feel that it is unlikely. As you will appreciate making an exception for you may open the Administrators to claims from other customers in a similar position to yourself and indeed from other customers that do not have the benefit of another loan to set their Redress off against."   And to further add to it, I got an email today saying they transferred the loan to a collection field agency "Conexus Recovery and Field Services Ltd "  
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Brand new bike full of rust from Victor Devine motorbikes Glasgow


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2627 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi there, a couple of friends who use this site recommended I make a post about a problem I am having with a brand new motorbike I bought.

 

I bought my new bike on the 6th of November from Honda dealership Victor Devine in Glasgow. 3 days later I was proudly showing it to friends and almost instantly one of them (an ex motorbike mechanic) pointed out a rough patch on the top of the fuel tank which turned out to be rust coming from the inside of the tank outward.

 

He said not to delay but to get in touch with the dealership and get it sorted, he also said to get the full thing checked out as something as apparent as that should have been spotted on the PDI check and if its been missed or ignored the rest of the bike needs looked at.

 

I had a quick look around the bike myself in more depth later and found the tax disc holder was also rusted right through. Having had the bike 3 days out of the showroom alarm bells started ringing. I emailed the dealership and they said to bring it in to check the problems, I did this and their camera wasnt up to the job of getting proper photos so while there and to avoid a wasted journey I asked if they could give the bike a once over to see if there were any other faults. They said they didnt need to and when it came in for a new fuel tank they would look at it then - a bit odd I thought as any problems found would mean another visit for me to get the next batch of issues resolved.

 

When I got home I decided not to wait and looked at the bike myself with a torch. It was at this point I found a whole batch of problems with it including :

 

- The fuel tank had corrosion on the top area, having started from the inside of the tank outward.

- Corrosion was dripping down the white side panels of the bike from the side of the tank.

- The tax disc holder was corroded through.

- There was corrosion on the bottom of the yoke plus impact damage from being hit with something repeatedly during installation.

- The paint had cracked and peeled off from the welds on the frame/chassis.

 

I have some photos but can't link them as I'm a new user. But you can paste them into your browser here:

 

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz1.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz2.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz3.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz4.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz5.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz6.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz7.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz8.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bz9.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bza.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bzb.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bzc.jpg

setcompanyglasgowltd.com/bike/bzd.jpg

i.imgur.com/BEyFiMo.jpg

i.imgur.com/M7eCOB8.jpg

i.imgur.com/zas69GW.jpg

i.imgur.com/Clbfres.jpg

 

Finding all these problems on a brand new bike shattered my confidence in the vehicle totally. Im not a mechanic and I dont know anything about bikes, so what other nasties could be lurking under panels or in areas hidden from view?

 

I asked the dealer for an exchange of another bike that had been fully checked or a full refund and they lied to me and said I wasnt entitled to that, all I could do was speak to Honda UK about warranty work as my contract is with them and the Victor Devine dealership is only an agent. I explained I had paid cash to them and hadnt bought direct from Honda or got finance but they still refused.

 

The dealer did tell me of another customer who had the same issues (with the frame corrosion) and that they (Victor Devine & Co) got a new frame from Honda, had it powder coated locally and the customer went away happy. I didnt like the sound of this but relented during the call as I just wanted to get out there and enjoy riding.

 

A few days later the dealer calls back and says they are no longer offering a new frame and that all Honda and themselves would do was - to quote "touch up the paint on the welds".

 

With a sizable list of defects on the bike and having bought it brand new from a dealer and from a company as big as Honda I thought this was a really bad way to treat a customer who had just bought a fairly expensive product (though of course not expensive in terms of bikes).

 

Added to that I'd already had a chat about upgrading to a bigger bike after winter with the guys at the dealership which would have meant more money for them plus I spent hundreds of pounds more on the day of bike purchase on winter jacket, winter trousers etc in their accessories department.

 

I spoke with the Citizens Advice Bureau and they told me I had been lied to when I requested to reject the bike, I also spoke with my lawyer who confirmed exactly the same thing that under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) goods supplied must :

 

- Be fit for purpose.

- Be of satisfactory appearance and finish.

- Be free of minor defects.

 

Victor Devine & Co Ltd refused to accept the rejection and told me to speak to Honda UK who admitted that yes my contract is with the dealer and they are the ones that by law have to give a refund.

 

Back to the dealer and they say they will replace the fuel tank, replace the bottom yoke and touch up the paint on the welds and tell me I am being unreasonable asking for a replacement bike or a refund as the bike is 99% perfect and has only "minor bits and bobs wrong with it".

 

I've sent a letter to the dealership but don't really know where to go from here now and was looking for any advice as everything seems to be going from bad to worse :(

 

Many thanks for reading and any help you can give me.

 

Rikki

Link to post
Share on other sites

convert your images to pdf and attach them via the go advanced button/manage attachments bottom right.

 

how did you pay for this

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am in agreement with Conniff- Reject the goods formally as it is obvious that the bile is not fit for purpose.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they saw you coming.

 

Email the ceo of Honda at the following address - [email protected] tell him how they have treated you and the state of the bike and that you have pictures you can email if he requires. Also say that you do not expect this sort of treatment from a company affiliated with Honda and who describes themselves as 'Premier Honda Dealers'.

 

Send Victor Devine a rejection letter by recorded delivery letter. Make sure the words 'Sale of Goods Act ' and 'The Supply of Goods to Consumers Act' are in your letter.

 

They are also on Facebook, so go there and tell the biking world

https://www.facebook.com/VictorDevineMotorcycles?hc_location=timeline

 

They are also on Twitter, go there and do the same https://twitter.com/VictorDevine

 

Keep us up to speed on what you do and what further help we can give you.

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended)

Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002

 

I am writing in connection with the purchase of [description of goods] from you on the date, at a cost of £….

 

On using the product I discovered the following faults:

 

List all the faults

 

I complained to the shop manager but my complaint has not been resolved. In accordance with my statutory rights under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended), i.e that goods be of satisfactory quality, as described, and fit for their purpose, I am writing to advise you that I am rejecting the goods on the basis of your breach of contract, and request a full refund of my money within 14 days of the date of this letter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you within the next fourteen days.

 

Yours faithfully

Sign and print your name here

 

Don't accept them saying they have 3 chances to repair it. This is brand new and there should not be damage of this sort.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites
just chipping in,dont let them touch up the rust spots,thats no good,the rust will just keep coming through,it needs to be rust treated before touching up

 

I wouldnt accept that :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

I am in agreement with Conniff- Reject the goods formally as it is obvious that the bile is not fit for purpose.

 

Hi there, I did this over a week ago by recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...