Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ppi put me in bankruptcy !!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3778 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

is this ALL the statements from start of the card to the end

 

is the card still active or was the agreement terminated at any time.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this ALL the statements from start of the card to the end

 

is the card still active or was the agreement terminated at any time.

 

No card is not active since first or second statement I just paid DD Terminated after Default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

somethings not right here....

 

the PPI was cancelled / last charged 22/08/2008.

 

interest ran until 22/11/2009.

 

if the account was terminated then they cant charge interest

 

i'll go look at your other thread.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

somethings not right here....

 

the PPI was cancelled / last charged 22/08/2008.

 

interest ran until 22/11/2009.

 

if the account was terminated then they cant charge interest

 

i'll go look at your other thread.

 

dx

 

Thank you, and your right in that something is not right ! its all about my equity ! xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wendy,

 

Been following your other thread with great interest - you are in good hands with Mouldy.

 

Just from looking at your statements you can claim the PPI back, and DX is the master on this, if miss-sold

 

I also noticed that you have Sentinel Card Protection as well (CPP by another name) - This can also be reclaimed (check the CPP forum)

 

You also have lots of Fees added which I think may also be reclaimable

 

Good luck and I hope you get the proof you need to annul the BK

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes noticed those too

 

do we know the card interest rate wb?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wendy,

 

Been following your other thread with great interest - you are in good hands with Mouldy.

 

Just from looking at your statements you can claim the PPI back, and DX is the master on this, if miss-sold

 

I also noticed that you have Sentinel Card Protection as well (CPP by another name) - This can also be reclaimed (check the CPP forum)

 

You also have lots of Fees added which I think may also be reclaimable

 

Good luck and I hope you get the proof you need to annul the BK

 

G

 

Morning Gerson, thank you, And yes I am so happy to have all you guys and gals looking after me xxx wendyboats aka Watson is on the case:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning dx yes it was 34.94% on CCA. Wendyboats very grateful for looking at this for me, I can upload CCA if you need it?:-)
been following your other thread wendy, but for some reason amongst your docs I am unable to read your CCA think it was around page 128, everthing up to there was readable, so for me it would help if you could upload the cap one cca,also of course it was purely the ppi that caused the overlimit fees that you were charged (further redress as per fsa ppi handbook) and best of luck with your endeavors!

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not a lot sadly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, in my absence all pre-planned in my opinion to get my equity ! WBxx

 

If that's the case then there is absolutely no point in going for your PPI as you no longer have the right to claim it. That right now vests with the trustee/official receiver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I think that the BK was forced on Wendy using incorrect process (two mobiles and a CC combined as one, bad service, etc.) - The Mould (Sherlock) is on the case and the main thing is to get the BK annulled and then attack the debts. She also appears to have had bad luck with sols and cab advise

 

Watson (aka - Wendy) is trying to fight on many fronts - this being one of them - getting to understand what the exact debt figure should be (if anything)

 

The CC was quoted as 850 in the BK but if you remove the PPI and Fees then this drops way below the limit for BK

 

The Trustee has no interest in the PPI from what I can gather and has made no effort in relation to this.

Simply wants her pound of flesh + gravy

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

been following your other thread wendy, but for some reason amongst your docs I am unable to read your CCA think it was around page 128, everthing up to there was readable, so for me it would help if you could upload the cap one cca,also of course it was purely the ppi that caused the overlimit fees that you were charged (further redress as per fsa ppi handbook) and best of luck with your endeavors!

 

Hi theoldrouge, thanks for interest in my threads I had trouble with uploads but I think its their some were I will try and put it in this thread, if I can. Kind regards wendyboats

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

 

Hope most of you know my case via thread in financial forum, I wounded if dx100 could work out the PPI and interest paid on my Capone if I was claiming back, just to see the total that should come off the alleged £850.00 debt.

 

 

I am in process of appeal and this information would be handy to have, I know its not a lot compared to some claims but it could be the difference between the £750.00 to bankrupt on the alleged £850.00 Debt used to bankrupt me out of £38,000 !

 

 

Kind Regards Wendyboats aka Watson xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...