Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Which Court have you received the claim from?  CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE, NORTHAMPTON Name of the Claimant?  LOWELL PORTFOLIO LTD How many defendant's joint or self?  SELF Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  03 MAY 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £6000 DUE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 FOR A LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF (ACCOUNT NO. 16 DIGITS LONG). THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH. THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON (DATE) NOVEEMBER 2016 NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT. THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUORY INTEREST UNDER S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FOR THE DATE PF ASSIGNMENT TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUMBE OF £0.00. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £6000. What is the total value of the claim? £6500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES, NOTICES OF CLAIM.  Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  YES  Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  NO Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  CREDIT CARD When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007?  BEFORE   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post?  I DONT RECALL   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  NO   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  DEBT PURCHASER.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? THE FIRST I RECALL WAS A LETTER FROM LOWELL SAYING THEY NOW OWNED THE DEBT.  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  NOT THAT I RECALL OR BEEN PROVIDED WITH THROUGH CCA REQUESTS.AT LAST REQUEST THEY SAID THEY WERE AWAITING THE DEFAULT NOTICE AND NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN UNTIL RESPONDED WHICH TO DATE I'VE NOT HAD OR SEEN.  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  NO, I RECEIEVED LETTERS OF CLAIMS   Why did you cease payments?  I WAS UNDER MEDICAL CARE WHICH CAUSED ME NOT TO WORK. AROUND THAT TIME LOWELL HAD WANTED ME TO INCREASE MY PAYMENTS AS IT WOULD TAKE TOO LONG TO CLEAR THE DEBT. I HAD BEEN PAYING THEM WHAT I WAS PAYING THE BANK. I EXPLAINED MY THEN HEALTH & FINANCIAL POSITION AND THAT I WAS UNABLE TO DO SO. THEY PUT A HOLD ON MY ACCOUNT FOR A FEW MONTHS SO I CANCELLED MY DIRECT DEBIT. I MADE A FULL AND FINAL OFFER WHICH WAS REJECTED. WHEN THEY WANTED PAYMENTS TO RESUME I EXPLAINED I WAS IN A WORSE FINANCIAL POSITION, STILL UNDERTAKING TREATMENT AND NOW UNEMPLOYED SO COULD NOT START PAYMENTS AS THEY WANTED. AFTER SENDING MY FINANCIAL SPREADSHEET THEY KEPT SENDING LETTERS ASKING WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO. I COULDN’T SEE A WAY FORWARD I FELT STREESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE SO WROTE THAT I WOULD NOT BE CORRESPONDING WITH THEM ANYMORE.    What was the date of your last payment? NOVEMBER / DECEMBER 2018   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I COMMUNICATED MY FINANCIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY, WE MADE A MONTHLY PAYMENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS KEPT FOR SEVERAL YEARS UNTIL DEBT WAS SOLD.  
    • Perhaps you would care to read this and reflect on your continuing comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany Jugg    ALEX BRUMMER: How grotesque of pro-Palestine protesters to besmirch Auschwitz, the place where my grandparents died WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK As the son of a refugee from the horrors of the Holocaust, I can feel nothing but contempt for the ignorance, gross... My elderly aunt Sussie and cousin Sheindy had been teenagers at Auschwitz and Belsen but survived and are alive to this day. What they will make of the protesters who waved flags, heckled and chanted as Israelis took part in the March Of The Living – the annual walk from Auschwitz to Birkenau – I cannot imagine. The images now circulating of the protesters are indescribably disturbing. They can only bring back memories of those final moments Sheindy shared with my grandparents when my grandmother Fanya squeezed her hand and told her to lie about her age to avoid the gas chambers. Claiming she was older, and could work, meant that Sheindy lived, not died. The outrage perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 has brought back the most terrifying memories for these two women – memories of pillage, mutilation and starvation. The Holocaust, or Shoah to use the Hebrew word, was the deliberate, industrial-scale killing of Jews.  It is bad enough that pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas sympathisers have chosen to steal the language of the Holocaust.  Any comparison between Israel's retaliation and the monstrous genocide of the 1940s is odious and anti-Semitic
    • Thank you JK2054 and BankFodder for your replies. The information requested is as follows:   My wife and I are sole traders supplying bespoke, handmade wedding trays and other items through our website. We do not sell on ebay. We had an order for two trays (invoice value £370) that were shipped on Monday 25th March. We used P2G as the broker and Evri as the shipper. We declared the value but did not take out insurance. As the trays were a present for a wedding on Saturday 30th March we checked the progress of delivery on the Thursday to see that there had been an attempt to deliver on the 27th but the driver failed to deliver as the customer’s gate was shut (customer informs us that the gates are open between 7am-7pm. We contacted the customer who informed us she had been waiting in all week and there had been no attempt of a delivery. Evri allege they attempted to deliver on the 28th & 29th. On the P2G web site on the 4th April at 14.17 it stated that the customer refused delivery. At 14.28 it updated to say there was a problem with the address and at 14.32 updated to say the customer had refused delivery. At 14.35 updated again to say it was being returned. Last entry was on the 7th April that it was being processed at the depot. We never received it. I have had six web chats with P2G between the 4th-30th April. On the 26th April, I had an offer of £20 plus cost of delivery (£6.72) from P2G which I rejected. During this time, I also contacted Evri that resulted in an email from Evri Customer Services (20th April) stating that they had lost the parcel. I replied requesting details of the attempted delivery but received no reply. After emailing Evri again on the 23rd asking again for the information I received a phone call from someone called Haleemah on the 25th who apologised and promised to send an email with a link to submit a claim form. I subsequently received an email with the link which only took me to a page that stated “Page not found”. After informing Evri customer services of the problem (to which no reply was forthcoming) a couple of days later I retried the link but it only took me to the Evri website. I believe that I have a good case against both companies but would appreciate guidance on which path to go down. I have read most of the information on this site, which has been very helpful and much appreciated, particularly the various court transcripts. I appreciate that this process is a marathon and not a sprint and am fully aware that I need to get everything in the correct order before starting on the legal road. I am sure this covers the current position but if further info is needed please let me know.  
    • Everything at small claims revolves around informality and common sense, there are no "special" ways to have to do things. The site manager's WS will be like yours and the one I linked to - just much shorter.  There need to be the introductory hearings about the case, the parties, etc., and the concluding Statement of Truth. In the middle just a couple of paragraphs where they say who they are, how they know you, and about permission being given by the landowner to use the car park. Superb.  I've added another section about the signage to the suggested WS sections three posts above. Yes, it's perfectly possible.  It'd be a good idea to phone the court on the 18th to see if they have paid.
    • OK thank you very much. I will prepare my WS as you advise.  I will indeed be preparing the WS over the weekend. I will also post UKPC's on Wednesday by 2nd class mail. As they have until the 17th to pay the court fee, is it possible they might discontinue at that stage too? Also I wanted to ask, in what form should the site manager's statement come? And the site owner if i can contact them? I will get photos of the signage to share with you also. Thank you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim form received from Drydens - MBNA debt poss faulty DN?


tony3x
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3425 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest CHEVRA

I sent a defence in respect of MBNA and not giving me enough time to rectify they. They were out by 3 days. Judge would not accept my defence and said " you still owe the money".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I sent a defence in respect of MBNA and not giving me enough time to rectify they. They were out by 3 days. Judge would not accept my defence and said " you still owe the money".

 

Whats the point of having regulations if the legal system ignores them.

 

I was going to use this as part of my defence so may have to reconsider. Also looking at unenforceable agreement as Section 61.(1) of the CCA 1974 states that the agreement should have a signature from the creditor when mine clearly does not. Also not sure whether the agreement fully satisfies as the reverse is adverts. The copy of the 'original terms' was supplied over a year after the original request.

 

I await more expert opinion and also what I have to do now that I have acknowledged service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats the point of having regulations if the legal system ignores them.

 

I was going to use this as part of my defence so may have to reconsider. Also looking at unenforceable agreement as Section 61.(1) of the CCA 1974 states that the agreement should have a signature from the creditor when mine clearly does not. Also not sure whether the agreement fully satisfies as the reverse is adverts. The copy of the 'original terms' was supplied over a year after the original request.

 

I await more expert opinion and also what I have to do now that I have acknowledged service.

 

Service of an invalid default notice defeats the claim, because the creditor cannot continue to enforce the agreement in contraventionof statute – s.87(1) CCA 1974 (as amended), see also the qualified judgement handed downby the Court of Appeal in Brandon vAmerican Express which confirms this and the lower Courts are bound by.

See – Harrison v LinkFinancial also, service of a valid default notice is a statutory provisionwhich must be complied with beforethe creditor can proceed to enforcement action on the agreement.

Again, the lower Courts are bound by this qualified statement. Refer to both of these judgements in yourDefence and respectfully refer the District Judge to the same and invite him toread the same (do not include the transcripts of these authorities with yourDefence, if you are Defending, simply state that you rely upon theseauthorities in respect of the invalid default notice served and that at the trial you will refer to said section ofthe statute (above)and these authorities for the full terms and effect of suchwhich you invite the Court to read)

The invaliddefault notice does not extinguish the debt!

Is there any ppi on this agreement? Are there any excessive and disproportionatecharges applied?

Do you dispute the amount claimed? If so, why? Do you haveany points of law (other than the above) that you can rely upon in your Defenceto either completely defeat this claim or reduce your liability for the same? I mean no disrespect to you, but please beopen and honest with your response hereto, if you omit some fact that is adverseto your proposed Defence, this will only leave us in a position to advise youon the material posted and if that circumstance were to occur, then you willreceive advice that is wrong and unreliable for your case.

If you are going to argue s.61 non-compliance pre-2006 amendments,credit agreement non-enforceable, thenyou had better undertake serious, committed research so that you are able todemonstrate in Court that you know and understand such submissions in this areaand establish that the agreement does not comply with the same.

Kind regards

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mould.

There has been no PPI or any excessive charges. Up until the financial crisis I had no problems with servicing then my income dropped by around 40%. I had to make decisions so wrote to my credit card providers offering a reduced payment. Some accepted what I offered, MBNA did not. They said that they could only accept a payment that was approx 50% of my actual payment. I paid this for a while but they still kept calling at all hours chasing the arrears. In the end I just got fed up and after reading about CMC's I thought I would give it a go. That was 4 years ago. At one point MBNA took 12 months to reply to a letter concerning points on the CCA. Wescot took it on and eventually sent it back then Drydens took it on for Arrow. At one point Drydens returned the file to Arrow. I then didn't hear for a while until all this started.

 

I don't dispute the amount owed.

I could probably do with finding out what documents Arrow will reply on in court. Is there a way I can get these before I file a defence?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I don't dispute the amount owed.

I could probably do with finding out what documents Arrow will reply on in court. Is there a way I can get these before I file a defenceicon?

 

thanks "

 

If you dont dispute the amount owed then why are you defending? Disclosure follows the defence not before.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am defending because I do not believe they have followed the correct procedure and also that the debt is not enforceable. Morally you could say that I am in the wrong but when I wanted help from MBNA they were not interested. I am also interested to know why MBNA did not take me to court over this if they thought that they would be successful, to finally get to this stage over 3 years after the default is strange to me and I think an abuse of the system.

 

I have constantly asked Drydens if they have a fully executed copy of the CCA to which they have never confirmed either way, juts kept sending me a copy of the 'agreement' that I already have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MBNA are a lender and their core business is lending. They do not want to proced to court in the main. They write the debt off against tax liability and sell it on to someone who will pursue you.

 

With the debt probably being allocated to Fast Track the risk you have is the potential for huge costs if you lose. As opposed to Small Claims where costs are limited, usually dependant on protocol followed by each party!

 

Whilst your DN is a credible arguement, and as The Mould quite rightly points out your defence has presidence to refer to, it all comes down to the DJ (undertsanding and willingness to understand) on the day; and there is a huge risk with the DN arguement.

 

It is not the most solid and iron clad defence scenario's IMHO.

 

Would it be a prudent measure to enter into negotiation for a settlement figure on installments? It could save you time, money and risk and should it go to court, shows an element of mediation?

 

Just my opinion and I know it may not be for everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am defending because I do not believe they have followed the correct procedure and also that the debt is not enforceable. Morally you could say that I am in the wrong but when I wanted help from MBNA they were not interested. I am also interested to know why MBNA did not take me to court over this if they thought that they would be successful, to finally get to this stage over 3 years after the default is strange to me and I think an abuse of the system.

 

I have constantly asked Drydens if they have a fully executed copy of the CCA to which they have never confirmed either way, juts kept sending me a copy of the 'agreement' that I already have.

 

As I said earlier, the unenforceable route is a viable one, but you must commit yourself to serious research on the same - Wilson v First County Trust is a key authority on this element of your Defence.

 

 

If you do not dispute the amount claimed, then, although you are angry and upset as regards the manner in which these robots have mistreated you, I would advise you that you ought to make an offer to repay the debt at a monthly rate that is within your means.

 

I still stand firm on all material posted by me regarding the invalid default notice. 3 years ago there was substantive debate, discussion and heated arguments on this subject, I presented well reasoned arguments thereon and the trolls requested that I provide case law to back my arguments up, I said that the case law was to come, it has come and you can rely upon it to end this action brought by your creditor.

 

The problem is that the creditor has clearly terminated the agreement in reliance upon invalid DN, the agreement is a bilateral agreement and the creditor cannot reinstate/make live again unilaterally, your consent would be required to do such; you can use this as a bargaining tool as regards offering to repay at a lesser rate without any admission of liability to the amount claimed, failing which, you can argue that creditor terminated and insisted upon his strict rights at a time when he was not entitled to and had no just cause to do so, therefore, creditor is contract breaker and you are the innocent party.

 

Research breach of contract, fundamental breach that is and the remedies available to the innocent party.

 

Its your case and you must make the decisions which you feel will best suit you and your family. As above, since you do not dispute the debt, you have no Defence to completely defeat it, therefore, notwithstanding my foregoing material, put an offer in writing to your creditor asking that he accepts £xyz as a reduced amount to repay the debt claimed, which you do not admit liability for, until the debt claimed is paid.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses.

 

Ideally I want to avoid any court action but have very limited available spare monthly funds. If I were to make an offer to make a monthly payment is there any sort of protocol as too how much I offer. Also I assume they would want an income & expenditure breakdown - Do they take into account my wifes income and outgoings?

Also what sort of %age would be an acceptable starting point for a F&F settlement - in case I can borrow the money.

 

As I have acknowledged service how would this effect any offers?

 

Any templates would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do one of those template IE ones from the likes of cab/national debtline for eg for your eyes only at this stage, see where you are.

 

acknowledging service doesn't affect any offers. see alloyz thread for eg, settlement was around 25% of the amount claimed in the end, on instalments. slightly different circs though.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses.

 

Ideally I want to avoid any court action but have very limited available spare monthly funds. If I were to make an offer to make a monthly payment is there any sort of protocol as too how much I offer. Also I assume they would want an income & expenditure breakdown - Do they take into account my wifes income and outgoings?

Also what sort of %age would be an acceptable starting point for a F&F settlement - in case I can borrow the money.

 

As I have acknowledged service how would this effect any offers?

 

Any templates would be greatly appreciated.

 

Offer any amount that you can reasonably afford to repay the debt, but make sure that you include the clause that you do not accept liability for amount claimed.

 

No templates available as regards full and final offers.

 

You have stated that you believe that you have grounds to argue non-compliance with s.61 CCA 1974 (as amended), therefore, chance your arm and offer 30% in full and final settlement of this account in order to bring about a satisfactory resolution to both parties concerned, failing which, you will assert at trial that the agreement does not comply with section 61 CCA 1974 (as amended) and is therefore unenforceable pursuant to the House of Lords decision handed down in Wilson v First County Trust.

 

You must research this case and make the decision which you believe to be beneficial to you and your family.

 

Further, research, Brandon v American Express, Harrison v Link Financial and Woodchester v Swain and fundamental breach of contract. In your case, who is the contract breaker, you or the creditor?

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

F&F is probably out of the question as I will not be able to get 30%, be lucky to get 10%. Will have to seriously think about either monthly or risk court.

I will look at the cases recommended and take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

F&F is probably out of the question as I will not be able to get 30%, be lucky to get 10%. Will have to seriously think about either monthly or risk court.

I will look at the cases recommended and take it from there.

 

OK Tony

 

The invalid default notice defeats the creditor's enforcement action.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Tony

 

The invalid default notice defeats the creditor's enforcement action.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

 

Thanks Mould.

 

Just need to familiarise myself with the process from now on in. ie do I submit my defence to the court based on the invalid default or is there something else i should do first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainley wouldn't borrow money to repay a debt !!

 

Depends on the circumstances when faced with a County Court Claim that you have little or no defence to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is an eg template full and final on nat debtline. amend to suit though if using, ensuring no admissions (eg not the bit '....which i owe' :) ).

 

 

Ford, I mean no disrespect to you, but template letters on full and final are useless and the wording of such are wrong and do not apply to each case of full and final.

 

No disrespect intended is repeated.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mould.

 

Just need to familiarise myself with the process from now on in. ie do I submit my defence to the court based on the invalid default or is there something else i should do first.

 

The invalid default noticed served and relied upon by creditor, means that he cannot proceed to enforcement action in reliance of such. Quote Court of Appeal (relevant para) in your Defence and quote s.87(1) CCA 1974 (as amended).

 

As regards your contentions of s.61 CCA 1974 (as amended) - meaning pre- 2006 amendments, then argue this also in your Defence. Its your choice, but as you do not dispute the debt, make an offer to repay the debt per month at a rate that is within your means and that such is offered without any admission of liability for amount claimed.

 

Weigh it all up, sleep on it after research that is, then make your executive decision.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll need to PDF the doc

and attach it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...