Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ANPR Ltd - Parking Charge notice **Appeal upheld at POPLA**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3790 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Geoff, sorry, I've not been on for a while. See my comments below. As you can see it's still ongoing. I've just this minute sent my appeal to POPLA, although I've still got to send some evidence. Need a bit of advice on what to send though, apart from the correspondence. I suppose I could take a picture of entrance to car park. Watch this space to see what happens!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you intend to write to POPLA then include the letters and particularly the ones you have received and point out that your appeal should be granted by default as ANPR have failed to follow the Code of Practice. POPLA may say that without an appeal referece you cannot appeal but there again, ANPR cant chase you either unless they supply a referenece No. so it is open to another appeal which will again be defaulted in your favour for breach of practice.

They cannot go to court for the same reason and if they tried a counterclaim for a few hundred quid for harassment and vexatious litigation will be in order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I did the appeal to POPLA on line yesterday. I didn't attach any correspondence as I don't have ANPR letters on computer. I'm going to scan them tomorrow when I get to work then I'll be able to send the lot. The letter they sent dated 1st October with the verification code, didn't state that it was for appeal to POPLA and I had no idea what it was, so I decided to ignore the ref, when I responded to them again with the copy of my original letter. I think I've just made the deadline for sending in the appeal. I wish I knew how to send the lot to you so that you can see the trail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi James, I've just received a letter from their 'Debt Collectors, H&S Litigation' even although my Popla appeal is still ongoing. I've advised Popla of this and reiterated my previous points. H&S even sent me a copy of the agreement between ANPR and the proprietor, which does not mention anything about a charge of £100 if they allow people to park on car park. I'm going to scan it tomorrow when I get to work and send on to POPLA. My partner has just shown me a site called Parking Prankster. Have a look at it with ref to ANPR, they have just lost a POPLA appeal. It's a very refreshing read and should put your mind at rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi James, I've just received a letter from their 'Debt Collectors, H&S Litigation' even although my Popla appeal is still ongoing. I've advised Popla of this and reiterated my previous points. H&S even sent me a copy of the agreement between ANPR and the proprietor, which does not mention anything about a charge of £100 if they allow people to park on car park. I'm going to scan it tomorrow when I get to work and send on to POPLA. My partner has just shown me a site called Parking Prankster. Have a look at it with ref to ANPR, they have just lost a POPLA appeal. It's a very refreshing read and should put your mind at rest.

 

 

I got letter of intent today even though I haven't got the popla papers to appeal ( waiting for anrp to send them) trying to attach all letters ive had but not finding it easy lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

it says

 

This debt is now being passed to H&S Litigation Services Ltd.

The appropriate agency will seek a court order instigating the recovery of debt.

 

Payment cannot be made to ANPR directly.

 

If however your payment is in the post notify us IMMEDIATELY to prevent further costs. If you are unsure you can visit anpr website

 

that's the whole letter so when I got it I phoned them up and they said they will send me details to appeal to popla

 

it also says Owing to ANPR Ltd £140.00

 

I tried uploading the letters I got but it wont let me if you have an email address ill send them to you.

I never appealed to anpr

Link to post
Share on other sites

They think they are clever with their wording the "appropriate agency" can only be ANPR ltd or an solicitor acting for them. H&S Litigation are either ANPR trying to scare people or they are acting illegally as the have no credit licence so can not collect 3rd party debts.

 

Watch out if they do send you a letter the POPLA code may well be disguised.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi folks, just to let you all know that I got response from POPLA today by email saying that my appeal had been UPHELD. WooHoo. Who says Friday 13th is a bad luck day......well maybe for ANPR. What a bunch of shysters. POPLA says their signs weren't clearly visible to cars entering the car park and that also, they hadn't demonstratedthat there was a genuine pre-estimate of loss for Liquidated damages or that there were indeed any losses as a result of parking there. I think a victory for ordinary people and common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does make you wonder how these companies manage to screw things upso often bearing in mind they are doing this all day every day and we are playing to their rules. we should have a day when all this is collated and sent to every MP and tell them that this is what the legislation lobbied for by the BPA and its members has brought upon the public and look how much time and effort has been expended by people to get these charlatans toobey the rules they set and perhaps a fining system should be intoroduced for every improperly issued ticket successfully appealed at PoPLA or court. That would make them squeak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bettyboo1954

 

I'm about to send my appeal into POPLA for the excat same carpark on a saturday night last August .My POPLA appeal has taken over my life for a week now !!!

 

I acually found out the owners Name, address and home tel number .And they live 2 good drive's a 3 wood and a stiif 7 iron from me .for the non golfers about 1000 yards

 

The PPC companys will try anywhich way to make money we live in a greedy world . Its the system or lack of it that allows them to get away with it which bother's me more .It takes us 10 years to remove an alleged Terriost for our country but we can only have 28 days to appeal an un lawfull parking ticket .or we run the risk of possibilly been taken to court !!

 

what i cant understand about some of the land owners is how much harm they are doing to the independant traders who pay them rent .If every one stops shopping there the shop's will go bust so no rent to the land owner!!! I'm going to write to all the shops on Lodge drive to let them know I'll now only shop in the multiples or large chain stores and beleaive me we did shop there

.I work for the largest opthalmic lens companay in the world our goal is to make sure the independant Opticians survive .Sadly A battle they are losing And things like this dont help them

 

I've really struggled with the whole appeal process... I'm niether clever or thick but god help some people.. But then thats what the PPC'S pray on .I nearly gave up myself Lets hope i'm as sucsessful as you

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I must thank the CAG for all the information I found on this site which helped me enormously in my fight against these morons. It took a lot of my time, but was worth it in the end. I sent POPLA my own pictures as their aerial diagram was a lot of tosh. There was definitely no sign at the entrance to the car park and as far as LDs are concerned, I personally, don't believe that they would have a leg to stand on if it went to court. The onus is on them to prove they have suffered loss as a result of you parking on the site, which they obviously didn't provide to POPLA. I suggest that if the Landlord really doesn't want people to park at weekends when shops are closed, then they should instruct their contractor (ANPR) to erect a barrier. The parish council has had a meeting with the Landowner to try and appeal to her to lift the restrictions on the car park to no avail, as apparently, she is disinterested. Good luck with your appeal. If you follow the advice on this site, I'm sure you'll succeed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It would seem my appeal cant be sent due to ANPR being decitful with the popla code .I did the same with loads of work,research and photos all to poss to no avail

 

Looks like i'll have to start with new letters to DVLA and BPA .Time i haven't got (wife fighting cancer at the moment) Its taken a week of my life to do this

 

But hey thats what they pray on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear of your troubles. They tried to sucker me into missing the deadline too by supplying a 'verification number' on their first letter to me. It was only by reading this site that I managed to get my appeal in on time using the original number they gave me. I've just been reading your thread and every bit of correspondence they sent to you, I have received, apart from the court claim form. I wouldn't worry if I were you, as you have enough information to hand to smash them if it goes to court, which I very much doubt. I'd just ignore them from now on and only respond if you get official court papers (which I very much doubt you'll get). They are a bunch of shysters and I'm sure all the good people on this site will help you towards your inevitable win. Take care

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...