Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital one old credit card debt - currently still paying lowell £1PCM since 2006


w1n3pd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just to update on the Capital One CCA response. I just received the following letter together with the signed copy of the agreement.

 

As this doesn't appear on my credit file any more, I shall treat it in the similar way as I have been advised for my DLC Case unless I receive a different advice from you guys.

 

 

Please see the attached for the letter I received.

 

As always, grateful for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we see the agreement please?

 

when you attach stuff

please PDF it first

 

if you cant read your attachments, neither can we!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thank you for the response. Sorry about the files, I thought they were readable. I am not at home for this week, upon my return would update you with good quality pdfs. I am grateful for your help as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a good time!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello There,

 

Since my last update I have received reply to CCA in two instalments, all of them are in the pdf attached. Please note that there is no mention of £1 payment that I have been giving to them. And when I last checked these do not appear on my credit file.

 

So far I have received the following;

 

1) signed copy of the contract - attached

2) T&C at the inception date - not attached as it is almost the same as default T&C which are attached

3) T&C at default - attached but no date of default is given

4) Statements of important transaction with corresponding letter of notification - attached

 

As there were too many pages it is possible that I might have not been able to see my personal details on some, if you spot any personal details kindly let me know so that I could take them off. Thanks.

 

I remain as ever grateful for your help and guidance.

Edited by w1n3pd
personal info omission
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Firstly you need to delete the figure on the send page of the letter.

 

What they have sent is an application form, not a properly regulated Credit Agreement.

 

I cannot read the paragraph at the bottom.

 

Is there any reference in it to T&Cs that you must read before you sign it?

 

Any reference to any conditions shown overleaf?

 

The Prescribed terms - interest rates, payment details, anything like that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply. I am grateful for this. I shall try to answer all the questions.

 

Hi there,

 

Firstly you need to delete the figure on the send page of the letter.

 

Could you please tell me which page number are you referring to? and which figure? Sorry!

 

 

Is there any reference in it to T&Cs that you must read before you sign it?

 

Any reference to any conditions shown overleaf?

 

The Prescribed terms - interest rates, payment details, anything like that?

 

 

Yes in the last paragraph there is reference to see overleaf under the heading of your marketing and heading. and it specifically refers to the agreement paragraph 23. My understanding is that perhaps the agreement was sent out together with the application form.

Edited by w1n3pd
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it says to refer to para 23 overleaf.

 

I shall get rid of that figure. But as you shall see I have posted in 14 pages in total that include statements as well. Should I get rid of all the figures which would mean removing all of statement pages?

 

 

Thanking you as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I apologise for not being clear. I have given it a second go with hopefully better quality, please see the attached. I have however typed the last paragraph as you said below.

 

 

 

Your information and marketing. important: please read ‘use of information’ overleaf (section 23 of the agreement) which sets out how your information will be used. By signing this application, you agree that information about you may be used like this, regardless of whether or not your application is accepted. One of the ways your information will be used is to send you information or phone you about other products or services offered by capital one or other companies. Your name, address and phone number may be given to those other companies for that purpose. If you do not wish to receive marketing information, please tick this box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you total up all the charges? Sorry if you have answered this earlier.

 

 

Please dont be. You are the one who is helping me. I should be grateful for your time.

 

I HAVE JUST RECONCILED THE INS AND OUTS AND FOUND OUT THAT

 

1) extra charges including interest payment have been of £120.

2) there are many recurring transactions such as direct debit received and then subsequently reversed. same thing happened to late payment fee and then those fees have been reversed. The idea was to prolong it as much as they can so that it goes above credit limit which would allow them to charge three charges on recurring basis, over limit charge, late payment and interest charges. The confusing bit is why have they been charging in the beginning and then subsequently cancelling just to keep on adding the interest payments. Please see the last pages of the above pdf for statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very confused by that too. :???:

 

However, what is obvious is that the credit agreement clearly was not in force at the time you signed the Application form, because paragraph 23 just refers to English Law.

 

I would write back and say that there is no connection whatsoever between your Application Form and what they allege is your credit agreement which does not even have a place for your signature and is therefore, of course, unsigned by you.

 

Then refer to them to the Waksman judgement in Carey v HSBC, paragraph 234 (4) which states that where an agreement has been varied a copy of the original agreement must be supplied.

 

Then tell them that under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPUTR 2008) they have an obligation to let you know if they hold, or have ever held, an original signed credit agreement for this alleged account and if they hold no such agreement they are equally obliged to inform you.

 

Also say that it is clear they have sent a document which you can prove is not the original agreement in a deliberate attempt to mislead and obtain money to which they are not legally entitled.

 

That should give them something to think about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just finished writing them the email with the following letter. They have replied by posts to my emails in the past.

 

 

Thank you for the recent letter I acknowledge the receipt of it. I have gone through the particulars and am yet to find all the relevant documents that I must receive in response to my CCA request under s77/78.

 

What you claim is an agreement is actually an application form and that there is no connection whatsoever between the Application Form and what you allege is my credit agreement which does not even have a place for my signature and is therefore, of course, unsigned by me. Furthermore the paragraph 23 on the application form that it refers to is a completely different paragraph on the alleged T&C at inception.

 

I would like to draw your attention to Waksman judgement in Carey v HSBC, paragraph 234 (4) which states that where an agreement has been varied a copy of the original agreement must be supplied. Also, you must be aware that knowingly fabricating an agreement of which a DCA has no legal rights of would lead to criminal proceedings by the defendant.

 

Also, under the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations (CPUTR 2008) you have an obligation to let me know if you hold, or have ever held, an original signed credit agreement for this alleged account. And if you hold no such agreement you are equally obliged to inform you as such.

 

Therefore, from the correspondence it can be safely deduced that the document that you have produced to me is not the original agreement and can be proven as such. I find it a deliberate attempt on your part to mislead and obtain monies from law abiding citizens for which you have no legal entitlement to.

 

Any further threatening correspondence would tantamount to extortionist behaviour and would be liable for criminal proceedings against you once a complaint has been lodged and strongly pursued with the ICO.

 

Sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good News!!

 

 

I received the attached on Friday last week. I am indebted to you guys for this. I owe this website and the people here a lot. Hopefully you guys shall accept my gratitude on my next pay day.

 

Thanks.

 

I am now excited about your advice on my other matters that I opened on this website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and another fleecer bites the dust!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...