Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3937 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am not saying that this has actually happened. I don’t know. I am just enquiring if anyone else has heard about it?

 

Whilst in the pub the other night, I over heard a conversation that went along the lines of: The Bank’s and Building Societies, had before the crash, been allowing home owners to get into difficulties so that they could reposes their homes, purchase them cheap at auction via a 3rd party and then sell them on for full price via the 3rd party thus depriving the owners of their home and equity, making themselves a nice profit. I wonder if anyone else has heard of this. I can easily see how these institutions could have looked on with envious eyes as equity soared for the homeowner and not for them. After all they had a mortgage invested in the place.

 

Nothing would surprise me these days; this would be yet even more rich pickings from the cash cow that we members have become?

 

I don’t normally listen into conversations, only I couldn’thelp it as they were standing right behind me and I couldn't help it.

Edited by notNBSagain
Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres no proof of this, but it wouldnt surprise me at all, given the antics of some of the biggest banks over the last few years.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfectly plausible, from a moral standpoint the Bank’s and Building Societies would have no qualms because to them it would represent a shrewd business move so long as they did not actively encourage people to swim out of their depth.

 

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is very likely with the sub-prime lenders.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure there are provisions in law to prevent that sort of thing from happening - that said with the way companies can be structured I also imagine it would be very easy to circumvent the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have said, it wouldn't surprise me in the least, in my opinion banks are a law unto themselves, and are at times legalised thieves when it comes to raising interest rates when it suits them, and making it difficult to pay more than the minimum on credit cards etc.

 

But the other reason I believe this could be plausible, is so many customers (Santander) had their overdrafts taken from them going back about 2yrs ago now, it didn't bother me as I don't use mine, but it came to light that their reason for doing this to everyone was to manipulate their lending statistics.

 

Those who wanted their overdrafts had to apply again (even though it came automatically with the bank account in the beginning), therefore it appeared that their lending had gone up!

 

They just forgot to mention that the overdrafts had probably dropped as people such as myself who originally had the facility, didn't bother applying! So it was less than the previous year!

 

Craft huh?

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little snippet that's highly appropriate to this thread.

 

here http://unemploymentmovement.com/forum/chat-a-rap/6312-bankers-caught-on-tape-joking-about-bailout-and-how-theyd-never-pay-it-back

 

Out of the horses mouth.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To a bank, they are not houses. They are purely numbers that can be manipulated into cold hard cash for the bankers.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank's and building society's are worse than criminals and building society's are the worst. We expect this sort of thing from criminals, scmmers and other low life, but not from the bank's and building society's. To make it worse building society' hide behind NOT being like bank's and having members who they can rip off with low interest rates and high interest rates depending on direction of travel, plus anything else they feel that they can get away with.

When you have problems they don't want to know. You automatically become an "I won't pay " NOT an “I can’tpay”. Remember criminals have rights, building society members and bank customers don’t.

Edited by notNBSagain
Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks are private companies. All private companies are the same and exist for one reason. To make money. The banks have the added bonus that the government won't do anything to them as the directors of the bank sit as advisors and as lords, as well as donating through intermediaries to whichever party is in power.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little snippet that's highly appropriate to this thread.

 

here http://unemploymentmovement.com/forum/chat-a-rap/6312-bankers-caught-on-tape-joking-about-bailout-and-how-theyd-never-pay-it-back

 

Out of the horses mouth.

 

OMG!!! :!:

 

Did you listen to the recording on the link?

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks duckwaddler & osdset.

I hadn't seen it. I have now. Authorities turning blind eye don't care at all. I suggest we teach the b*****ds a lesson and kick them all out at the next election. What we need is new blood. Remember MP's expenses. If everyone who voted conservative and liberal democrat last time voted labour and everyone who voted labour voted conservative and all those who didn't vote stayed in bed and continued not giving a dam, then in theory every MP in the government at the moment would be out and we would have completely new parliament, full of new blood. Of course though, we could all vote UKIP. that would teach the b*****ds .

I must say, I was amused to see the Tower of London in the background, that is exactly where they deserve to be imprisoned, awaiting the axe.

The real problem is that MP’s think they have a career, and the voters can go to hell and back again. They forget that we put them where they are and pay them. They also tend to forget that the government has no money and neither does local government. The only money they have is ours. which they are extremely loathed to give back to us when we need it. Going back on their word planning cut backs in pensions etc. etc.

Don't let them get their feet under the table, it's a mistake. Keep voting them out instead of in, it sharpens their mind's and makes them think of us for a change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you REALLY want change in this country then you need a new political party. Get the people who want change behind you, get economists etc to draw up a plan, then get started in the local by elections and progress up. The current main 3 parties are in it for themselves. They have proven that over and over yet people are too stubborn or stupid to realise that and keep blindly voting for them in every election.

 

We have dozens of political parties for each constituency yet only 3 really ever get voted for.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest problem is that the voters are too isolated. They need some sort of organisation in order to be able to pull together and get rid of the rubbish we find ourselves stuck with. If only we could come together with a plan to target and kick certain MP's out, then they would have to change the way they operate, irrelevant of their party, in favour of the people and not themselves. We need a new party that has a chance of getting in and getting us our country back from Europe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One big problem is "safe seats" that just happen to be the deciding constituencies. The conservatives for example have 1 deciding seat that has been safe since the early 1900's

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even so, I bet most constituents don't bother voting even in safe seats. If they did start voting and were a part of the plan, then there would be no safe seats at all. However, it would need organisation and commitment from all the non voting electorate to vote and to vote the way required.

If this happened we the electorate could put any party we wished into power and really take charge of our country instead of it being left to these Morons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been this way for over a hundred years. It's ingrained in the minds of people. You wont change it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was just browsing the FCA site and thought you folks may be interested in this. http://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/financial-services-products/mortgages/mortgage-fraud

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry I have only just seen your replies, I've not been on in a while and couldn't find the thread :lol:

 

Odset's right, a brand new political party is what's needed - only thing is, political folk are greedy folk, no matter what party they're from, it would be nice if the people could run the country!

 

Not gonna happen though, and wouldn't work!

 

I really don't know what the answer is :|

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...