Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Advice Please?!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5693 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello chaps,

 

I have had an on going saga with this company. My barclaycard account was passed to Cabot about 6 years ago. I ignored most correspondance as I found these monkeys rather clueless, rude and threatening.

 

I've paid probably about £200 in dribs and drabs in the 6 years since they took over the account. I owe about £500 now (which is about what I owed in the first place!). However last week I received a letter saying;

 

We previously advised you that failure to resolve this outstanding debt would result in commencmeent of one of the below actions being taken:

 

1.Instruction to an external agent to call on you

2.A warrant of execution

3.A charging order

4.An attachment of earnings order

5.Order to obtain information

 

Failure to respond now ensures the commencement of one of the above actions

 

 

(Big kisses,)

 

Invented name

Recoveries Manager

-----------

Where do I stand? What should I do? It appears many people on here are pretty clued up about this company so any input is much appreciated.

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

n.b - I've read various Cabot threads and understand the 6 year rule, however I don't know the exact date that they brought my account. I presume writing to them requesting my CCA is the best option and finding out, and presumably I'd find out how old this account is? Can anyone link me to the relevant template? Many thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying...

 

Ok, so would you advise against writing to them and requesting my CCA still?

 

Doesn't really matter. You don't have a Limitation Act argument against them. However, if they are unable to provide a copy of the signed agreement under a CCA demand then the debt is unenforceable and, arguably, you might be able to recover the payments already made.

 

I would actually recommend that anyone dealing with Cabot makes a CCA request. This is a parasitic debt buyer that purchases debt cheap and then tries to intimidate people into paying the face value of the debt and hence a large profit. At the same time they don't, in my opinion, take their obligations to the debtor very seriously. Anything that anyone can do to make this company do what it is supposed to do and to make life difficult for them is fair enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is the CCA template I used, they replied saying they were investigating but that was about 6 weeks ago so I have issued court papers against them, see the link in my signature.

 

I have marked in red the bits you have to change

 

To: CABOT FINANCIAL (EUROPE) LIMITED,

PO BOX 241,

WEST MALLING,

ME19 4NA

Date: 28/8/2006

Dear Sir or Madam

After recently obtaining a copy of our credit file from Experian & Equifax we was concerned to note that your company has placed a "Default" notice against X accounts detailed above in our names.

Previous address was BLAH.

Further to this we have no recollection of ever receiving such a notice, and we therefore require you to substantiate this data at your earliest convenience.

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is our right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. we enclose a £1 cheque in payment of the statutory fee. .

2. You must supply me with a signed true and certified copy of the original default notice

3. Any deed of assignment if the debt was sold on

I would request that this data is provided to myself within the next 14 days, if you are unable to provide this data then we must insist that it is removed from our files as unsubstantiated.

Yours faithfully

  • Haha 1

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sent a CCA request to cabot and barclaycard for a debt that a family member knows nothing about.

 

they never had a barclaycard although I did apply some years ago but cancelled the agreement before any documentation arrived. Certainly never had a card or spent anything on it.

 

barclaycard deny they exhist and they say the acount number doesnt exhist.

 

Interesting to see what happens.

 

Ill start own thread if it gets interesting

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sent a CCA request to cabot and barclaycard for a debt that a family member knows nothing about.

 

they never had a barclaycard although I did apply some years ago but cancelled the agreement before any documentation arrived. Certainly never had a card or spent anything on it.

 

barclaycard deny they exhist and they say the acount number doesnt exhist.

 

Interesting to see what happens.

 

Ill start own thread if it gets interesting

 

 

Shouldn't that be a dpa Subject Access request to Barclaycard?

 

Just to cheer you up, someone stole my ID and applied for a card - PM me if you want to know how it was done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im a little concerned thats whats happened.

 

Strangely though this is a couple of years old and he has never received a statement or any corres.

 

and barclaycard state the account dosnt exhist.

 

I was hoping to sort this out without spending another 10 quid on a SAR.

 

Sorry for the minor hijacking

 

will start thread if it gets interesting

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello guys.

 

I have recently recieved a letter from cabot saying they have taken over my dept from Online Finance, they said in this letter that i owe them nearly £400 more than what my account with online finance? i have been paying online finance £20 p.m since november 07. As i couldnt work due to damaging my arm, i went to see c.a.b. and have sent the letter to them. Only the other day i got a call asking to confirm my details which i declined to do as cabot wouldnt give me any information. i feel i should just stop paying or keep paying online finance. Any help on this matter please as the more i read about this company the more worried im getting.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Myobbgit - you would do best to start your own thread, otherwise this one might get confusing!

 

My dealings with Cabot have just ended for now, I requested a CCA for a Goldfish account which they are supposed to have been assigned earlier this year, after the usual - returning my fee we have asked the original lender etc etc, they sent me statements and said they had complied, I rang them ( would never advise anybody else to do this though) and they advised me that Goldfish have said they can't find any agreement :D

 

I told them I wouldn't be paying them, yesterday I received a letter from Cabot saying my accound had been returned to Goldfish.

 

Always send a CCA in the first instance - good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Myobbgit - you would do best to start your own thread, otherwise this one might get confusing!

 

My dealings with Cabot have just ended for now, I requested a CCA for a Goldfish account which they are supposed to have been assigned earlier this year, after the usual - returning my fee we have asked the original lender etc etc, they sent me statements and said they had complied, I rang them ( would never advise anybody else to do this though) and they advised me that Goldfish have said they can't find any agreement :D

 

I told them I wouldn't be paying them, yesterday I received a letter from Cabot saying my accound had been returned to Goldfish.

 

Always send a CCA in the first instance - good luck :)

 

 

Well done, another one bites the dust :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...